Todd Hembrough1, Wei-Li Liao1, Christopher P Hartley2, Patrick C Ma3, Vamsidhar Velcheti4, Christopher Lanigan5, Sheeno Thyparambil1, Eunkyung An1, Manish Monga6, David Krizman1, Jon Burrows7, Laura J Tafe8. 1. OncoPlex Diagnostics, Rockville, MD; NantOmics, LLC, Rockville, MD; 2. Department of Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; current affiliation: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; 3. Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussig Cancer Institute, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, and current affiliation: Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV. 4. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, and. 5. Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; 6. Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV; 7. OncoPlex Diagnostics, Rockville, MD; 8. Department of Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; laura.j.tafe@hitchcock.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Crizotinib has antitumor activity in ALK (anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current diagnostic test for ALK rearrangement is breakapart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), but FISH has low throughput and is not always reflective of protein concentrations. The emergence of multiple clinically relevant biomarkers in NSCLC necessitates efficient testing of scarce tissue samples. We developed an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) protein assay that uses multiplexed selected reaction monitoring (SRM) to quantify absolute amounts of ALK in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue. METHODS: After validation in formalin-fixed cell lines, the SRM assay was used to quantify concentrations of ALK in 18 FFPE NSCLC samples that had been tested for ALK by FISH and immunohistochemistry. Results were correlated with patient response to crizotinib. RESULTS: We detected ALK in 11 of 14 NSCLC samples with known ALK rearrangements by FISH. Absolute ALK concentrations correlated with clinical response in 5 of 8 patients treated with crizotinib. The SRM assay did not detect ALK in 3 FISH-positive patients who had not responded to crizotinib. In 1 of these cases, DNA sequencing revealed a point mutation that predicts a nonfunctional ALK fusion protein. The SRM assay did not detect ALK in any tumor tissue with a negative ALK status by FISH or immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: ALK concentrations measured by SRM correlate with crizotinib response in NSCLC patients. The ALK SRM proteomic assay, which may be multiplexed with other clinically relevant proteins, allows for rapid identification of patients potentially eligible for targeted therapies.
BACKGROUND:Crizotinib has antitumor activity in ALK (anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current diagnostic test for ALK rearrangement is breakapart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), but FISH has low throughput and is not always reflective of protein concentrations. The emergence of multiple clinically relevant biomarkers in NSCLC necessitates efficient testing of scarce tissue samples. We developed an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) protein assay that uses multiplexed selected reaction monitoring (SRM) to quantify absolute amounts of ALK in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue. METHODS: After validation in formalin-fixed cell lines, the SRM assay was used to quantify concentrations of ALK in 18 FFPE NSCLC samples that had been tested for ALK by FISH and immunohistochemistry. Results were correlated with patient response to crizotinib. RESULTS: We detected ALK in 11 of 14 NSCLC samples with known ALK rearrangements by FISH. Absolute ALK concentrations correlated with clinical response in 5 of 8 patients treated with crizotinib. The SRM assay did not detect ALK in 3 FISH-positive patients who had not responded to crizotinib. In 1 of these cases, DNA sequencing revealed a point mutation that predicts a nonfunctional ALK fusion protein. The SRM assay did not detect ALK in any tumor tissue with a negative ALK status by FISH or immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS:ALK concentrations measured by SRM correlate with crizotinib response in NSCLCpatients. The ALK SRM proteomic assay, which may be multiplexed with other clinically relevant proteins, allows for rapid identification of patients potentially eligible for targeted therapies.
Authors: Todd Hembrough; Sheeno Thyparambil; Wei-Li Liao; Marlene M Darfler; Joseph Abdo; Kathleen M Bengali; Stephen M Hewitt; Richard A Bender; David B Krizman; Jon Burrows Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2013-05-11 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Johannes M Heuckmann; Hyatt Balke-Want; Florian Malchers; Martin Peifer; Martin L Sos; Mirjam Koker; Lydia Meder; Christine M Lovly; Lukas C Heukamp; William Pao; Ralf Küppers; Roman K Thomas Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Yan Feng; Eugen C Minca; Christopher Lanigan; Angen Liu; Wei Zhang; Lihong Yin; Nathan A Pennell; Carol Farver; Raymond Tubbs; Patrick C Ma Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Daniel V T Catenacci; Wei-Li Liao; Sheeno Thyparambil; Les Henderson; Peng Xu; Lei Zhao; Brittany Rambo; John Hart; Shu-Yuan Xiao; Kathleen Bengali; Jamar Uzzell; Marlene Darfler; David B Krizman; Fabiola Cecchi; Donald P Bottaro; Theodore Karrison; Timothy D Veenstra; Todd Hembrough; Jon Burrows Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yeoun Jin Kim; Steve M M Sweet; Jarrett D Egertson; Andrew J Sedgewick; Sunghee Woo; Wei-Li Liao; Gennifer E Merrihew; Brian C Searle; Charlie Vaske; Robert Heaton; Michael J MacCoss; Todd Hembrough Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Jacob J Kennedy; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Regine M Schoenherr; Ping Yan; Kimberly Allison; Melissa Shipley; Melissa Lerch; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Geoffrey Stuart Baird; Amanda G Paulovich Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 4.466