Literature DB >> 30481034

Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry To Quantify Protein Levels in FFPE Tumor Biopsies for Molecular Diagnostics.

Yeoun Jin Kim1, Steve M M Sweet1, Jarrett D Egertson2, Andrew J Sedgewick3, Sunghee Woo1, Wei-Li Liao1, Gennifer E Merrihew2, Brian C Searle2, Charlie Vaske3, Robert Heaton1, Michael J MacCoss2, Todd Hembrough1.   

Abstract

Mass spectrometry-based protein quantitation is currently used to measure therapeutically relevant protein biomarkers in CAP/CLIA setting to predict likely responses of known therapies. Selected reaction monitoring (SRM) is the method of choice due to its outstanding analytical performance. However, data-independent acquisition (DIA) is now emerging as a proteome-scale clinical assay. We evaluated the ability of DIA to profile the patient-specific proteomes of sample-limited tumor biopsies and to quantify proteins of interest in a targeted fashion using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor biopsies ( n = 12) selected from our clinical laboratory. DIA analysis on the tumor biopsies provided 3713 quantifiable proteins including actionable biomarkers currently in clinical use, successfully separated two gastric cancers from colorectal cancer specimen solely on the basis of global proteomic profiles, and identified subtype-specific proteins with prognostic or diagnostic value. We demonstrate the potential use of DIA-based quantitation to inform therapeutic decision-making using TUBB3, for which clinical cutoff expression levels have been established by SRM. Comparative analysis of DIA-based proteomic profiles and mRNA expression levels found positively and negatively correlated protein-gene pairs, a finding consistent with previously reported results from fresh-frozen tumor tissues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DIA-mass spectrometry; cancer biomarkers; clinical proteomics; protein biomarkers

Year:  2018        PMID: 30481034      PMCID: PMC6465117          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  47 in total

1.  Targeted proteomics strategy applied to biomarker evaluation.

Authors:  Yeoun Jin Kim; Sebastien Gallien; Jan van Oostrum; Bruno Domon
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  New targeted approaches for the quantification of data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Roland Bruderer; Julia Sondermann; Chih-Chiang Tsou; Alonso Barrantes-Freer; Christine Stadelmann; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Manuela Schmidt; Lukas Reiter; David Gomez-Varela
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  A subcellular map of the human proteome.

Authors:  Peter J Thul; Lovisa Åkesson; Mikaela Wiking; Diana Mahdessian; Aikaterini Geladaki; Hammou Ait Blal; Tove Alm; Anna Asplund; Lars Björk; Lisa M Breckels; Anna Bäckström; Frida Danielsson; Linn Fagerberg; Jenny Fall; Laurent Gatto; Christian Gnann; Sophia Hober; Martin Hjelmare; Fredric Johansson; Sunjae Lee; Cecilia Lindskog; Jan Mulder; Claire M Mulvey; Peter Nilsson; Per Oksvold; Johan Rockberg; Rutger Schutten; Jochen M Schwenk; Åsa Sivertsson; Evelina Sjöstedt; Marie Skogs; Charlotte Stadler; Devin P Sullivan; Hanna Tegel; Casper Winsnes; Cheng Zhang; Martin Zwahlen; Adil Mardinoglu; Fredrik Pontén; Kalle von Feilitzen; Kathryn S Lilley; Mathias Uhlén; Emma Lundberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  High HER2 protein levels correlate with increased survival in breast cancer patients treated with anti-HER2 therapy.

Authors:  Paolo Nuciforo; Sheeno Thyparambil; Claudia Aura; Ana Garrido-Castro; Marta Vilaro; Vicente Peg; José Jimenez; Rocio Vicario; Fabiola Cecchi; William Hoos; Jon Burrows; Todd Hembrough; Juan Carles Ferreres; José Perez-Garcia; Joaquin Arribas; Javier Cortes; Maurizio Scaltriti
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation.

Authors:  Minoru Kanehisa; Yoko Sato; Masayuki Kawashima; Miho Furumichi; Mao Tanabe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Statistical control of peptide and protein error rates in large-scale targeted data-independent acquisition analyses.

Authors:  George Rosenberger; Isabell Bludau; Uwe Schmitt; Moritz Heusel; Christie L Hunter; Yansheng Liu; Michael J MacCoss; Brendan X MacLean; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Patrick G A Pedrioli; Lukas Reiter; Hannes L Röst; Stephen Tate; Ying S Ting; Ben C Collins; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Chromatogram libraries improve peptide detection and quantification by data independent acquisition mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Brian C Searle; Lindsay K Pino; Jarrett D Egertson; Ying S Ting; Robert T Lawrence; Brendan X MacLean; Judit Villén; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Proteogenomics connects somatic mutations to signalling in breast cancer.

Authors:  Philipp Mertins; D R Mani; Kelly V Ruggles; Michael A Gillette; Karl R Clauser; Pei Wang; Xianlong Wang; Jana W Qiao; Song Cao; Francesca Petralia; Emily Kawaler; Filip Mundt; Karsten Krug; Zhidong Tu; Jonathan T Lei; Michael L Gatza; Matthew Wilkerson; Charles M Perou; Venkata Yellapantula; Kuan-lin Huang; Chenwei Lin; Michael D McLellan; Ping Yan; Sherri R Davies; R Reid Townsend; Steven J Skates; Jing Wang; Bing Zhang; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Henry Rodriguez; Li Ding; Amanda G Paulovich; David Fenyö; Matthew J Ellis; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of HER2 expression in the selection of gastric cancer patients for trastuzumab treatment.

Authors:  E An; C-Y Ock; T-Y Kim; K-H Lee; S-W Han; S-A Im; T-Y Kim; W-L Liao; F Cecchi; A Blackler; S Thyparambil; W H Kim; J Burrows; T Hembrough; D V T Catenacci; D-Y Oh; Y-J Bang
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  5 in total

1.  Deep Proteomics Using Two Dimensional Data Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Kyung-Cho Cho; David J Clark; Michael Schnaubelt; Guo Ci Teo; Felipe da Veiga Leprevost; William Bocik; Emily S Boja; Tara Hiltke; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Evaluation of Disposable Trap Column nanoLC-FAIMS-MS/MS for the Proteomic Analysis of FFPE Tissue.

Authors:  Stephan Eckert; Yun-Chien Chang; Florian P Bayer; Matthew The; Peer-Hendrik Kuhn; Wilko Weichert; Bernhard Kuster
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 5.370

3.  Selective Labeling and Identification of the Tumor Cell Proteome of Pancreatic Cancer In Vivo.

Authors:  Nancy G Azizian; Delaney K Sullivan; Litong Nie; Sammy Pardo; Dana Molleur; Junjie Chen; Susan T Weintraub; Yulin Li
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Optimization of Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry for Deep and Highly Sensitive Proteomic Analysis.

Authors:  Yusuke Kawashima; Eiichiro Watanabe; Taichi Umeyama; Daisuke Nakajima; Masahira Hattori; Kenya Honda; Osamu Ohara
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Emerging mass spectrometry-based proteomics methodologies for novel biomedical applications.

Authors:  Lindsay K Pino; Jacob Rose; Amy O'Broin; Samah Shah; Birgit Schilling
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.407

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.