Literature DB >> 24518086

Parallel FISH and immunohistochemical studies of ALK status in 3244 non-small-cell lung cancers reveal major discordances.

Florian Cabillic1, Audrey Gros, Frédéric Dugay, Hugues Begueret, Laura Mesturoux, Dan Cristian Chiforeanu, Leila Dufrenot, Vincent Jauffret, Dominique Dachary, Romain Corre, Alexandra Lespagnol, Gwendoline Soler, Julien Dagher, Véronique Catros, Michèle Le Calve, Jean-Philippe Merlio, Marc-Antoine Belaud-Rotureau.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements occur in 1% to 7% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Crizotinib, an ALK inhibitor, has been demonstrated to provide dramatic clinical benefits in ALK-positive advanced-stage NSCLC. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has been established in clinical trials as the standard procedure method for detecting ALK rearrangements. Although the detection of ALK by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been proposed for the screening of patients, large-scale studies are warranted to validate such a hierarchical approach.
METHODS: In this article, we report the largest series thus far of parallel FISH and IHC ALK testing in 3244 consecutive NSCLC cases analyzed at two independent French centers.
RESULTS: FISH-positive and/or IHC-positive results were demonstrated in 150 of 3244 cases (4.6%). An imbalanced sex ratio was detected, with women exhibiting a 2.2-fold relative risk for an alteration. Strikingly, only 80 of 150 specimens were classified as ALK positive by both techniques. The specimens with discordant FISH/IHC analyses were FISH-positive/IHC-negative (36), FISH-negative/IHC-positive (19), or FISH-noncontributive/IHC-positive (15). Thus, a single FISH or IHC analysis performed alone would have failed to detect approximately one-fourth of the ALK-positive cases with similar findings in our two centers.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the feasibility of systematic NSCLC testing by both FISH and IHC in routine practice. Many preanalytical factors may account for the apparent discrepancies between both methods, suggesting that hierarchical screening may underscore ALK-positive cases. This significant level of discrepancy supports the need of combined testing to optimize the detection of ALK-inhibitor-eligible patients given that some patients with discordant testing were found to respond to crizotinib.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24518086     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  47 in total

1.  Comment on: "Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Harboring ALK Translocations: Clinical Characteristics and Management in a Real-Life Setting: a French Retrospective Analysis (GFPC 02-14 Study)".

Authors:  Arnaud Uguen
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 2.  ALK alterations and inhibition in lung cancer.

Authors:  Tri Le; David E Gerber
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 15.707

3.  For staining of ALK protein, the novel D5F3 antibody demonstrates superior overall performance in terms of intensity and extent of staining in comparison to the currently used ALK1 antibody.

Authors:  Diana Taheri; David J Zahavi; Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez; Abdelrazak Meliti; Neda Rezaee; Raluca Yonescu; Bernardo F P Ricardo; Shahaboddin Dolatkhah; Yi Ning; Justin A Bishop; George J Netto; Rajni Sharma
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Lung cancer as a paradigm for precision oncology in solid tumours.

Authors:  Simon Schallenberg; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse; Reinhard Buettner
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Next-Generation Sequencing and Immunohistochemistry as Future Gold Standard of ALK Testing in Lung Cancer?

Authors:  Arnaud Uguen; Matthieu Talagas; Pascale Marcorelles; Paul Guéguen; Sebastian Costa; Sophie Andrieu-Key; Marc De Braekeleer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-07-08

Review 6.  Tackling ALK in non-small cell lung cancer: the role of novel inhibitors.

Authors:  Francesco Facchinetti; Marcello Tiseo; Massimo Di Maio; Paolo Graziano; Emilio Bria; Giulio Rossi; Silvia Novello
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06

Review 7.  Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Testing: IHC vs. FISH vs. NGS.

Authors:  Xiaomin Niu; Jody C Chuang; Gerald J Berry; Heather A Wakelee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-11-16

8.  [Statement of the German Society for Pathology and the working group thoracic oncology of the working group oncology/German Cancer Society on ALK testing in NSCLC: Immunohistochemistry and/or FISH?].

Authors:  M von Laffert; P Schirmacher; A Warth; W Weichert; R Büttner; R M Huber; J Wolf; F Griesinger; M Dietel; C Grohé
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 9.  Immunohistochemistry for predictive biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mari Mino-Kenudson
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10

Review 10.  The Current Landscape of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Emerging Treatment Paradigms and Future Directions.

Authors:  Angel Qin; Shirish Gadgeel
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.