Literature DB >> 26585502

Effect of alternative video displays on postures, perceived effort, and performance during microsurgery skill tasks.

Denny Yu1, Cooper Green2, Steven J Kasten3, Michael E Sackllah4, Thomas J Armstrong5.   

Abstract

Physical work demands and posture constraint from operating microscopes may adversely affect microsurgeon health and performance. Alternative video displays were developed to reduce posture constraints. Their effects on postures, perceived efforts, and performance were compared with the microscope. Sixteen participants performed microsurgery skill tasks using both stereo and non-stereoscopic microscopes and video displays. Results showed that neck angles were 9-13° more neutral and shoulder flexion were 9-10° more elevated on the video display than the microscope. Time observed in neck extension was higher (30% vs. 17%) and neck movements were 3x more frequent on the video display than microscopes. Ratings of perceived efforts did not differ among displays, but usability ratings were better on the microscope than the video display. Performance times on the video displays were 66-110% slower than microscopes. Although postures improved, further research is needed to improve task performance on video displays.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Microsurgery displays; Posture patterns

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26585502      PMCID: PMC5737936          DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  45 in total

Review 1.  Physical risk factors for neck pain.

Authors:  G A Ariëns; W van Mechelen; P M Bongers; L M Bouter; G van der Wal
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; D L Forkey; W D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems, during laparoscopy.

Authors:  M A Veelen; J J Jakimowicz; R H M Goossens; D W Meijer; J B J Bussmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Manifestations of shoulder fatigue in prolonged activities involving low-force contractions.

Authors:  Michiel de Looze; Tim Bosch; Jaap van Dieën
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Adopting the operating microscope in thyroid surgery: safety, efficiency, and ergonomics.

Authors:  Bruce J Davidson; Elizabeth Guardiani; Andrea Wang
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  The effect of work-related sustained trapezius muscle activity on the development of neck and shoulder pain among young adults.

Authors:  Therese N Hanvold; Morten Wærsted; Anne Marit Mengshoel; Espen Bjertness; Hein Stigum; Jos Twisk; Kaj Bo Veiersted
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Video microsurgery: evaluation of standard laparoscopic equipment for the practice of microsurgery.

Authors:  P J Gorman; D R Mackay; R H Kutz; D R Banducci; R S Haluck
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic.

Authors:  Adrian Park; Gyusung Lee; F Jacob Seagull; Nora Meenaghan; David Dexter
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Musculoskeletal occupational injury among surgeons: effects for patients, providers, and institutions.

Authors:  William T Davis; Sarah A Fletcher; Oscar D Guillamondegui
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 10.  Endurance time is joint-specific: a modelling and meta-analysis investigation.

Authors:  Laura A Frey Law; Keith G Avin
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Beyond magnification and illumination: preliminary clinical experience with the 4K 3D ORBEYE™ exoscope and a literature review.

Authors:  Michael Amoo; Jack Henry; Mohsen Javadpour
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Intraoperative workload in robotic surgery assessed by wearable motion tracking sensors and questionnaires.

Authors:  Denny Yu; Cem Dural; Melissa M B Morrow; Liyun Yang; Justin W Collins; Susan Hallbeck; Magnus Kjellman; Mikael Forsman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Performance of microvascular anastomosis with a new robotic visualization system: proof of concept.

Authors:  F Boehm; P J Schuler; R Riepl; L Schild; T K Hoffmann; J Greve
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-08-19

4.  Assessment and Comparison of Three Dimensional Exoscopes for Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Guided Surgery Using Second-Window Indocyanine-Green.

Authors:  Steve S Cho; Clare W Teng; Emma De Ravin; Yash B Singh; John Y K Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-04-14

5.  Video Super-microsurgery Amplified using Close-up Lens Filter on the Operative Field Camera: Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Motoi Kato; Shoji Watanabe; Azusa Watanabe; Hiroki Utsunomiya; Takayuki Yokoyama; Taro Watanabe
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-08-06

6.  Surgeon's comfort: The ergonomics of a robotic exoscope using a head-mounted display.

Authors:  Anto Abramovic; Matthias Demetz; Aleksandrs Krigers; Marlies Bauer; Sara Lener; Daniel Pinggera; Johannes Kerschbaumer; Sebastian Hartmann; Helga Fritsch; Claudius Thomé; Christian F Freyschlag
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2021-12-28

7.  Quantifying Intraoperative Workloads Across the Surgical Team Roles: Room for Better Balance?

Authors:  Denny Yu; Bethany Lowndes; Cornelius Thiels; Juliane Bingener; Amro Abdelrahman; Rebecca Lyons; Susan Hallbeck
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.