Literature DB >> 11547140

Video microsurgery: evaluation of standard laparoscopic equipment for the practice of microsurgery.

P J Gorman1, D R Mackay, R H Kutz, D R Banducci, R S Haluck.   

Abstract

Traditional microsurgery involves the use of bulky and expensive stereo microscopes that have limited portability. Recent advances in video technology have enabled the exploration of alternative visualization methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate standard laparoscopic equipment for microvascular anastomoses. Eight surgeons completed anastomoses on rat femoral and synthetic vessels using stereo microsurgery and video microsurgery visualization systems. All surgeons had previous experience with stereo microsurgery and none had ever used video microsurgery. Data were collected on overall anastomosis and individual suture times. A sample of completed anastomoses was placed in a video database and evaluated by use of a quality rating scale (8 to 10, excellent; 6 to 7, adequate; less than 6, poor). All surgeons subjectively evaluated the video microsurgery system. A total of 48 anastomoses were completed. The average total anastomosis time for the stereo microsurgery was 1018.9 +/- 463.2 seconds versus 1738.9 +/- 460.1 seconds for the video microsurgery. The average individual suture placement time was 114.6 +/- 60.6 seconds for the stereo microsurgery versus 211.7 +/- 128.4 seconds for the video microsurgery (p < 0.05). Twenty-five of the anastomoses underwent quality review. The overall score of the stereo microsurgery group was 8.1 +/- 1.7, and the video microsurgery group had an overall score of 7.3 +/- 1.6. Survey results revealed that 75 percent of the participants thought that the video microsurgery would be useful for human operations and would improve surgeon comfort, but 87.5 percent would not use the present video microsurgery system over stereo microsurgery in their practice. Although significant differences exist in overall anastomosis and individual suture completion times, no difference was found in the overall quality. Video microsurgery could become a useful tool on the basis of surgeon ergonomics; however, optical parameters require further refinement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11547140     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200109150-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  Effect of alternative video displays on postures, perceived effort, and performance during microsurgery skill tasks.

Authors:  Denny Yu; Cooper Green; Steven J Kasten; Michael E Sackllah; Thomas J Armstrong
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Video Super-microsurgery Amplified using Close-up Lens Filter on the Operative Field Camera: Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Motoi Kato; Shoji Watanabe; Azusa Watanabe; Hiroki Utsunomiya; Takayuki Yokoyama; Taro Watanabe
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-08-06

3.  A comparison of using a smartphone versus a surgical microscope for microsurgical anastomosis in a non-living model.

Authors:  Surut Jianmongkol; Chaiyos Vinitpairot; Navapong Thitiworakarn; Settapon Wattanakamolchai
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-15

4.  Surgeon's comfort: The ergonomics of a robotic exoscope using a head-mounted display.

Authors:  Anto Abramovic; Matthias Demetz; Aleksandrs Krigers; Marlies Bauer; Sara Lener; Daniel Pinggera; Johannes Kerschbaumer; Sebastian Hartmann; Helga Fritsch; Claudius Thomé; Christian F Freyschlag
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2021-12-28

5.  Morphometric analysis of rat femoral vessels under a video magnification system.

Authors:  Rui Sergio Monteiro de Barros; Rafael Aquino Leal; Renan Kleber Costa Teixeira; Vitor Nagai Yamaki; Felipe Lobato da Silva Costa; Daniel Haber Feijó; Andre Lopes Valente
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.