Literature DB >> 26584096

Assessment and Validation of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Molecular Atomization Energies.

Katja Hansen1, Grégoire Montavon2, Franziska Biegler2, Siamac Fazli2, Matthias Rupp3, Matthias Scheffler1, O Anatole von Lilienfeld4, Alexandre Tkatchenko1, Klaus-Robert Müller2,5.   

Abstract

The accurate and reliable prediction of properties of molecules typically requires computationally intensive quantum-chemical calculations. Recently, machine learning techniques applied to ab initio calculations have been proposed as an efficient approach for describing the energies of molecules in their given ground-state structure throughout chemical compound space (Rupp et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 058301). In this paper we outline a number of established machine learning techniques and investigate the influence of the molecular representation on the methods performance. The best methods achieve prediction errors of 3 kcal/mol for the atomization energies of a wide variety of molecules. Rationales for this performance improvement are given together with pitfalls and challenges when applying machine learning approaches to the prediction of quantum-mechanical observables.

Year:  2013        PMID: 26584096     DOI: 10.1021/ct400195d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  59 in total

1.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics and Adaptive Neural Networks.

Authors:  Lin Shen; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Solvation Free Energy Calculations with Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics and Machine Learning Models.

Authors:  Pan Zhang; Lin Shen; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Predicting Molecular Energy Using Force-Field Optimized Geometries and Atomic Vector Representations Learned from an Improved Deep Tensor Neural Network.

Authors:  Jianing Lu; Cheng Wang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  A neural network protocol for electronic excitations of N-methylacetamide.

Authors:  Sheng Ye; Wei Hu; Xin Li; Jinxiao Zhang; Kai Zhong; Guozhen Zhang; Yi Luo; Shaul Mukamel; Jun Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Machine Learning for Electronically Excited States of Molecules.

Authors:  Julia Westermayr; Philipp Marquetand
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  What Does the Machine Learn? Knowledge Representations of Chemical Reactivity.

Authors:  Joshua A Kammeraad; Jack Goetz; Eric A Walker; Ambuj Tewari; Paul M Zimmerman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Force Field for Water Based on Neural Network.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 6.475

8.  Bypassing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learning.

Authors:  Felix Brockherde; Leslie Vogt; Li Li; Mark E Tuckerman; Kieron Burke; Klaus-Robert Müller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Ab Initio Machine Learning in Chemical Compound Space.

Authors:  Bing Huang; O Anatole von Lilienfeld
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 10.  Towards operando computational modeling in heterogeneous catalysis.

Authors:  Lukáš Grajciar; Christopher J Heard; Anton A Bondarenko; Mikhail V Polynski; Jittima Meeprasert; Evgeny A Pidko; Petr Nachtigall
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 54.564

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.