Literature DB >> 26583942

Extremely premature birth and the choice of neonatal intensive care versus palliative comfort care: an 18-year single-center experience.

J W Kaempf1, M W Tomlinson2, J Tuohey3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Review all live births 22 0/7 through 26 6/7 weeks gestation born 1996 through 2013 at our institution to describe the decision process and immediate outcomes of palliative comfort care (PCC) versus neonatal intensive care (NICU) and whether any significant family complaints or quality assurance concerns arose. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review, physician and ethicist interview process and database review focused upon our established periviability counseling guidelines that are directive of PCC at 22 weeks gestation and NICU at 26 weeks but supportive of informed family choice of either option at 23, 24 and 25 weeks. RESULT: At 22 weeks--all 54 infants had PCC; at 23 weeks--29/78 (37%) chose NICU care, 6/29 (21%) infants survived; at 24 weeks--79/108 (73%) chose NICU care, 47/79 (59%) survived; at 25 weeks--147/153 (96%) chose NICU care, 115/147 (78%) survived; and at 26 weeks--all infants had NICU care, 176/203 (87%) survived. Over 18 years and 606 births, we identified only three significant concerns from families and/or physicians that required formal review.
CONCLUSION: Most pregnant women and families choose NICU care for their extremely premature infant, but if given the option via shared decision making, a significant proportion will choose PCC at gestational ages that some NICUs mandate resuscitation. We support a reasoned dialogue and bioethical framework that recognizes human values to be irreducibly diverse, sometimes conflicting, and ultimately incommensurable--value pluralism. Respectful shared decision making requires thoughtful and compassionate flexibility, nuanced and individualized suggestions for PCC or NICU and the reduction of hierarchical directives from physicians to families. We continue to advocate and rely upon informed family preference between 23 and 25 weeks gestation in our updated 2015 periviability guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26583942     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2015.171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  38 in total

1.  A Saudi family making end-of-life decisions in the PICU.

Authors:  Sadeth Sayeed; Aasim Padela; Maryam Y Naim; John D Lantos
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Periviable birth: management and counseling issues--volume 1.

Authors:  Brian M Mercer; Tonse N K Raju
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Saving vs creating: perceptions of intensive care at different ages and the potential for injustice.

Authors:  Annie Janvier; Mark R Mercurio
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 4.  Outcomes following periviable birth.

Authors:  Cody Arnold; Jon E Tyson
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.300

5.  Periviable birth: management and counseling issues--part 2.

Authors:  Tonse N K Raju; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.300

6.  Deciding to resuscitate extremely premature babies: how do parents and neonatologists engage in the decision?

Authors:  Antoine Payot; Sylvie Gendron; Francine Lefebvre; Hubert Doucet
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Harm and uncertainty in newborn intensive care.

Authors:  Kenneth Kipnis
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2007

Review 8.  An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive approach to peri-viability: gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal and neonatal dimensions.

Authors:  F A Chervenak; L B McCullough; M I Levene
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Nobody likes premies: the relative value of patients' lives.

Authors:  A Janvier; I Leblanc; K J Barrington
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Babies born at the threshold of viability: changes in survival and workload over 20 years.

Authors:  Sarah E Seaton; Sophie King; Bradley N Manktelow; Elizabeth S Draper; David J Field
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.747

View more
  11 in total

1.  Prenatal (non)treatment decisions in extreme prematurity: evaluation of Decisional Conflict and Regret among parents.

Authors:  R Geurtzen; J Draaisma; R Hermens; H Scheepers; M Woiski; A van Heijst; M Hogeveen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Antenatal corticosteroids for the late preterm infant and agnotology.

Authors:  J W Kaempf; G Suresh
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  The importance of shared decision-making in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Frank Soltys; Sydney E Philpott-Streiff; Lindsay Fuzzell; Mary C Politi
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Field testing of decision coaching with a decision aid for parents facing extreme prematurity.

Authors:  G P Moore; B Lemyre; T Daboval; S Ding; S Dunn; S Akiki; N Barrowman; A L Shephard; M L Lawson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Active Treatment of Infants Born at 22-25 Weeks of Gestation in California, 2011-2018.

Authors:  Xuxin Chen; Tianyao Lu; Jeffrey Gould; Susan R Hintz; Deirdre J Lyell; Xiao Xu; Lillian Sie; Matthew Rysavy; Alexis S Davis; Henry C Lee
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.314

6.  Information Order for Periviable Counseling: Does It Make a Difference?

Authors:  Siobhan McDonnell; Ke Yan; U Olivia Kim; Kathryn E Flynn; Melodee Nugent Liegl; Steven R Leuthner; Jennifer J McIntosh; Mir A Basir
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.314

7.  The quest for sustained multiple morbidity reduction in very low-birth-weight infants: the Antifragility project.

Authors:  J W Kaempf; N M Schmidt; S Rogers; C Novack; M Friant; L Wang; N Tipping
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Shared decision-making, value pluralism and the zone of parental discretion.

Authors:  Joseph W Kaempf; Nicholas Kockler; Mark W Tomlinson
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.299

9.  Effect of written outcome information on attitude of perinatal healthcare professionals at the limit of viability: a randomized study.

Authors:  V Papadimitriou; B Tosello; R Pfister
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Prenatal parental involvement in decision for delivery room management at 22-26 weeks of gestation in France - The EPIPAGE-2 Cohort Study.

Authors:  Cerise Levaillant; Laurence Caeymaex; Hélène Béhal; Monique Kaminski; Caroline Diguisto; Barthélémy Tosello; Elie Azria; Olivier Claris; Pierre Bétrémieux; Laurence Foix L'Hélias; Patrick Truffert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.