Literature DB >> 17365448

An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive approach to peri-viability: gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal and neonatal dimensions.

F A Chervenak1, L B McCullough, M I Levene.   

Abstract

Peri-viability, 22-26 completed weeks' gestational age, has generated ongoing clinical ethical controversies concerning the roles of abortion, caesarean delivery for fetal indication, neonatal resuscitation and limits on life-sustaining treatment of neonates. This paper provides a comprehensive, ethically justified approach to the clinical management of peri-viable fetuses and infants. We reviewed available data about the outcomes of peri-viable fetuses and developed an outcomes-based ethical framework that appeals to the ethical principles of beneficence, autonomy and justice. We identified beneficence-based, autonomy-based and justice-based considerations that should guide clinical judgement, the informed consent process, and decisions about termination of pregnancy, caesarean delivery and setting justified limits on life-sustaining treatment of neonatal patients. Ethics is an essential component of perinatal medicine because it provides physicians with an evidence-based, ethically justified, comprehensive approach to the gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal and neonatal dimensions of peri-viability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17365448     DOI: 10.1080/01443610601133605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  8 in total

1.  Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants.

Authors:  Matthew A Rysavy; Lei Li; Edward F Bell; Abhik Das; Susan R Hintz; Barbara J Stoll; Betty R Vohr; Waldemar A Carlo; Seetha Shankaran; Michele C Walsh; Jon E Tyson; C Michael Cotten; P Brian Smith; Jeffrey C Murray; Tarah T Colaizy; Jane E Brumbaugh; Rosemary D Higgins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Periviable birth: executive summary of a Joint Workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Authors:  T N K Raju; B M Mercer; D J Burchfield; G F Joseph
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Extremely premature birth and the choice of neonatal intensive care versus palliative comfort care: an 18-year single-center experience.

Authors:  J W Kaempf; M W Tomlinson; J Tuohey
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 4.  Current principles and practice of ethics and law in perinatal medicine.

Authors:  C Berceanu; Simona Elena Albu; Mihaela BoȚ; M Șt Ghelase
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2014-08-04

5.  Prospective study of early and late outcomes of extremely low birthweight in Central Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mostafa A Abolfotouh; Saif Al Saif; Waleed A Altwaijri; Mohammed A Al Rowaily
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  Decisions and outcome for infants born near the limit of viability.

Authors:  Fahad Al Hazzani; Saleh Al Alaiyan; Mohammed Bin Jabr; Abdulaziz Binmanee; Mahmoud Shaltout; Yazeed Moqbil Al Motairy; Abdulhameed Sami Qashqary; Abdullah Saleh Al Dughaither
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2020-06-04

7.  How old are you? Newborn gestational age discriminates neonatal resuscitation practices in the Italian debate.

Authors:  Emanuela Turillazzi; Vittorio Fineschi
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 8.  Factors influencing the care provided for periviable babies in Australia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Susan Ireland; Robin Ray; Sarah Larkins; Lynn Woodward
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.