Literature DB >> 26583708

Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the "Gold Standard," CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit?

Jan Řezáč1, Pavel Hobza1,2.   

Abstract

We have quantified the effects of approximations usually made even in accurate CCSD(T)/CBS calculations of noncovalent interactions, often considered as the "gold standard" of computational chemistry. We have investigated the effect of excitation series truncation, frozen core approximation, and relativistic effects in a set of 24 model complexes. The final CCSD(T) results at the complete basis set limit with corrections to these approximations are the most accurate estimate of the true interaction energies in noncovalent complexes available. The average error due to these approximations was found to be about 1.5% of the interaction energy.

Year:  2013        PMID: 26583708     DOI: 10.1021/ct400057w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  32 in total

Review 1.  Metal Ion Modeling Using Classical Mechanics.

Authors:  Pengfei Li; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Fast, accurate evaluation of exact exchange: The occ-RI-K algorithm.

Authors:  Samuel Manzer; Paul R Horn; Narbe Mardirossian; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Benchmarking DFT methods with small basis sets for the calculation of halogen-bond strengths.

Authors:  Antti Siiskonen; Arri Priimagi
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Survival of the most transferable at the top of Jacob's ladder: Defining and testing the ωB97M(2) double hybrid density functional.

Authors:  Narbe Mardirossian; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Machine Learning Force Field Parameters from Ab Initio Data.

Authors:  Ying Li; Hui Li; Frank C Pickard; Badri Narayanan; Fatih G Sen; Maria K Y Chan; Subramanian K R S Sankaranarayanan; Bernard R Brooks; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Improved parameterization of interatomic potentials for rare gas dimers with density-based energy decomposition analysis.

Authors:  Nengjie Zhou; Zhenyu Lu; Qin Wu; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications.

Authors:  Anders S Christensen; Tomáš Kubař; Qiang Cui; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Hydrogen-Bond-Dependent Conformational Switching: A Computational Challenge from Experimental Thermochemistry.

Authors:  James Luccarelli; Robert S Paton
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.354

9.  Psi4 1.4: Open-source software for high-throughput quantum chemistry.

Authors:  Daniel G A Smith; Lori A Burns; Andrew C Simmonett; Robert M Parrish; Matthew C Schieber; Raimondas Galvelis; Peter Kraus; Holger Kruse; Roberto Di Remigio; Asem Alenaizan; Andrew M James; Susi Lehtola; Jonathon P Misiewicz; Maximilian Scheurer; Robert A Shaw; Jeffrey B Schriber; Yi Xie; Zachary L Glick; Dominic A Sirianni; Joseph Senan O'Brien; Jonathan M Waldrop; Ashutosh Kumar; Edward G Hohenstein; Benjamin P Pritchard; Bernard R Brooks; Henry F Schaefer; Alexander Yu Sokolov; Konrad Patkowski; A Eugene DePrince; Uğur Bozkaya; Rollin A King; Francesco A Evangelista; Justin M Turney; T Daniel Crawford; C David Sherrill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Cation-π interactions of methylated ammonium ions: a quantum mechanical study.

Authors:  Chaya Rapp; Elizabeth Goldberger; Nasim Tishbi; Rachel Kirshenbaum
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.