Literature DB >> 30586500

Hydrogen-Bond-Dependent Conformational Switching: A Computational Challenge from Experimental Thermochemistry.

James Luccarelli1,2, Robert S Paton1,3.   

Abstract

We have compiled an experimental data set (SWITCH10) of equilibrium constants for a series of hydrogen-bond-dependent conformational switches. These organic molecules possess common functionalities and are representative in terms of size and composition of systems routinely studied computationally. They exist as two well-defined conformations which serve as a useful tool to benchmark computational estimates of experimental Gibbs energy differences. We examine the performance of HF theory and a variety of density functionals (B3LYP, B3LYP-D3, CAM-B3LYP, ωB97X-D, M06-2X) against these experimental benchmarks. Surprisingly, despite a strong similarity between the two switch conformations, the average errors (0.4-1.7 kcal·mol-1) obtained across the data set for all methods are larger than obtained with HF calculations. B3LYP was found to outperform implicitly and explicitly dispersion-corrected functionals, with an average error smaller by 1 kcal·mol-1. Unsystematic errors in the optimized structures were found to contribute to the relatively poor performance obtained, while quasi-rigid rotor harmonic oscillator thermal contributions are important in improving the accuracy of computed Gibbs energy differences. These results emphasize the challenge of quantitative accuracy in computing solution-phase thermochemistry for flexible systems and caution against the often used (but unstated) assumption of favorable error cancellation in comparing conformers or stereoisomers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30586500      PMCID: PMC6467729          DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b02436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Org Chem        ISSN: 0022-3263            Impact factor:   4.354


  43 in total

1.  Are free energy calculations useful in practice? A comparison with rapid scoring functions for the p38 MAP kinase protein system.

Authors:  D A Pearlman; P S Charifson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Energies, structures, and electronic properties of molecules in solution with the C-PCM solvation model.

Authors:  Maurizio Cossi; Nadia Rega; Giovanni Scalmani; Vincenzo Barone
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  van der Waals density functional for general geometries.

Authors:  M Dion; H Rydberg; E Schröder; D C Langreth; B I Lundqvist
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Benchmark database of accurate (MP2 and CCSD(T) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs.

Authors:  Petr Jurecka; Jirí Sponer; Jirí Cerný; Pavel Hobza
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions.

Authors:  Aleksandr V Marenich; Christopher J Cramer; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Self-consistent implementation of a nonlocal van der Waals density functional with a Gaussian basis set.

Authors:  Oleg A Vydrov; Qin Wu; Troy Van Voorhis
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom-atom dispersion corrections.

Authors:  Jeng-Da Chai; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 8.  Asymmetric catalysis by chiral hydrogen-bond donors.

Authors:  Mark S Taylor; Eric N Jacobsen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  Computational characterization and modeling of buckyball tweezers: density functional study of concave-convex pi...pi interactions.

Authors:  Yan Zhao; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2008-02-18       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 10.  Hydrogen bonding and pi-stacking: how reliable are force fields? A critical evaluation of force field descriptions of nonbonded interactions.

Authors:  Robert S Paton; Jonathan M Goodman
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.