A Kuijer1, A C M van Bommel2, C A Drukker3, M van der Heiden-van der Loo4, C H Smorenburg5, P J Westenend6, S C Linn5, E J Th Rutgers7, S G Elias8, Th van Dalen1. 1. Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Pathology, Laboratory for Pathology Dordrecht, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Dutch national guideline advises use of gene-expression signatures, such as the 70-gene signature (70-GS), in case of ambivalence regarding the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). In this nationwide study, the impact of 70-GS use on the administration of CT in early breast cancer patients with a dubious indication for CT is assessed. METHODS: Patients within a national guideline directed indication area for 70-GS use who were surgically treated between November 2011 and April 2013 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry database. The effect of 70-GS use on the administration of CT was evaluated in guideline- and age-delineated subgroups addressing potential effect of bias by linear mixed-effect modeling and instrumental variable (IV) analyses. RESULTS: A total of 2,043 patients within the indicated area for 70-GS use were included, of whom 298 received a 70-GS. Without use of the 70-GS, 45% of patients received CT. The 70-GS use was associated with a 9.5% decrease in CT administration (95% confidence interval (CI): -15.7 to -3.3%) in linear mixed-effect model analyses and IV analyses showed similar results (-9.9%; 95% CI: -19.3 to -0.4). CONCLUSION: In patients in whom the Dutch national guidelines suggest the use of a gene-expression profile, 70-GS use is associated with a 10% decrease in the administration of adjuvant CT.Genet Med 18 7, 720-726.Genetics in Medicine (2016); 18 7, 720-726. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.152.
PURPOSE: The Dutch national guideline advises use of gene-expression signatures, such as the 70-gene signature (70-GS), in case of ambivalence regarding the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). In this nationwide study, the impact of 70-GS use on the administration of CT in early breast cancer patients with a dubious indication for CT is assessed. METHODS: Patients within a national guideline directed indication area for 70-GS use who were surgically treated between November 2011 and April 2013 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry database. The effect of 70-GS use on the administration of CT was evaluated in guideline- and age-delineated subgroups addressing potential effect of bias by linear mixed-effect modeling and instrumental variable (IV) analyses. RESULTS: A total of 2,043 patients within the indicated area for 70-GS use were included, of whom 298 received a 70-GS. Without use of the 70-GS, 45% of patients received CT. The 70-GS use was associated with a 9.5% decrease in CT administration (95% confidence interval (CI): -15.7 to -3.3%) in linear mixed-effect model analyses and IV analyses showed similar results (-9.9%; 95% CI: -19.3 to -0.4). CONCLUSION: In patients in whom the Dutch national guidelines suggest the use of a gene-expression profile, 70-GS use is associated with a 10% decrease in the administration of adjuvant CT.Genet Med 18 7, 720-726.Genetics in Medicine (2016); 18 7, 720-726. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.152.
Authors: P G Cusumano; D Generali; E Ciruelos; L Manso; I Ghanem; E Lifrange; G Jerusalem; J Klaase; F de Snoo; L Stork-Sloots; L Dekker-Vroling; M Lutke Holzik Journal: Breast Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Foluso O Ademuyiwa; Austin Miller; Tracey O'Connor; Stephen B Edge; Mangesh A Thorat; George W Sledge; Ellis Levine; Sunil Badve Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-01-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Marieke E Straver; Annuska M Glas; Juliane Hannemann; Jelle Wesseling; Marc J van de Vijver; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Harm van Tinteren; Laura J Van't Veer; Sjoerd Rodenhuis Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2009-02-13 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Ben S Wittner; Dennis C Sgroi; Paula D Ryan; Tako J Bruinsma; Annuska M Glas; Anitha Male; Sonika Dahiya; Karleen Habin; Rene Bernards; Daniel A Haber; Laura J Van't Veer; Sridhar Ramaswamy Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: S Mook; M K Schmidt; B Weigelt; B Kreike; I Eekhout; M J van de Vijver; A M Glas; A Floore; E J T Rutgers; L J van 't Veer Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: R Torrisi; C A Garcia-Etienne; A Losurdo; E Morenghi; L Di Tommaso; W Gatzemeier; A Sagona; B Fernandes; C Rossetti; M Eboli; A Rubino; E Barbieri; C Andreoli; S Orefice; C Gandini; S Rota; M Zuradelli; G Masci; A Santoro; C Tinterri Journal: Breast Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Marc Buyse; Sherene Loi; Laura van't Veer; Giuseppe Viale; Mauro Delorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Mahasti Saghatchian d'Assignies; Jonas Bergh; Rosette Lidereau; Paul Ellis; Adrian Harris; Jan Bogaerts; Patrick Therasse; Arno Floore; Mohamed Amakrane; Fanny Piette; Emiel Rutgers; Christos Sotiriou; Fatima Cardoso; Martine J Piccart Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-09-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: R Exner; Z Bago-Horvath; R Bartsch; M Mittlboeck; V P Retèl; F Fitzal; M Rudas; C Singer; G Pfeiler; M Gnant; R Jakesz; P Dubsky Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Kay Schreuder; Anne Kuijer; Sanne Bentum; Thijs van Dalen; Sabine Siesling Journal: Public Health Genomics Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: J E C van Steenhoven; A Kuijer; K Schreuder; S G Elias; P J van Diest; E van der Wall; S Siesling; T van Dalen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Daniël J van der Meer; Iris Kramer; Marissa C van Maaren; Paul J van Diest; Sabine C Linn; John H Maduro; Luc J A Strobbe; Sabine Siesling; Marjanka K Schmidt; Adri C Voogd Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 7.396