Literature DB >> 23643803

Potential impact of the 70-gene signature in the choice of adjuvant systemic treatment for ER positive, HER2 negative tumors: a single institution experience.

R Torrisi1, C A Garcia-Etienne, A Losurdo, E Morenghi, L Di Tommaso, W Gatzemeier, A Sagona, B Fernandes, C Rossetti, M Eboli, A Rubino, E Barbieri, C Andreoli, S Orefice, C Gandini, S Rota, M Zuradelli, G Masci, A Santoro, C Tinterri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated in a single institution series of 124 women with operable breast cancer whether tumor clinicopathological features could predict the 70-gene signature (Mammaprint, MP) results, and whether MP results could help to make decisions for the use of chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with ER positive breast cancer beyond recommendations of international guidelines.
RESULTS: Among the 68 ER/PgR positive, HER2 negative tumors, Ki-67 ≥ 20% was the only significant predictor of a high risk-MP among standard clinicopathological features. In candidates for endocrine therapy with undetermined benefit from CT according to international guidelines, MP results would have led to different treatment decisions in 13/46 (28%) and in 20/68 (29%) pts according to NCCN and St. Gallen recommendations, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67 independently predicted high risk-MP in ER/PgR positive, HER2 negative tumors. MP results would have led to discordant treatment recommendations in about 30% of cases, generally increasing indication rate for CT. The results of large randomized trials are warranted in order to understand whether we should rely on multigene assays rather than on standard clinicopathological features for treatment decisions.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23643803     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  6 in total

1.  A novel quantitative immunohistochemistry method for precise protein measurements directly in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens: analytical performance measuring HER2.

Authors:  Kristian Jensen; Rikke Krusenstjerna-Hafstrøm; Jesper Lohse; Kenneth H Petersen; Helene Derand
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Prognostic relevance of biological subtype overrides that of TNM staging in breast cancer: discordance between stage and biology.

Authors:  Hyun Ae Jung; Yeon Hee Park; Moonjin Kim; Sungmin Kim; Won Jin Chang; Moon Ki Choi; Jung Yong Hong; Seok Won Kim; Won Ho Kil; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Jin Nam; Jin Seok Ahn; Young-Hyuck Im
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-10-19

3.  Transferring MINDACT to Daily Routine: Implementation of the 70-Gene Signature in Luminal Early Breast Cancer - Results from a Prospective Registry of the Austrian Group Medical Tumor Therapy (AGMT).

Authors:  Theresa Westphal; Simon P Gampenrieder; Gabriel Rinnerthaler; Marija Balic; Florian Posch; Nadia Dandachi; Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger; Roland Reitsamer; Karl Sotlar; Bianca Radl; Christoph Suppan; Herbert Stöger; Richard Greil
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Comparative Effectiveness of Biomarkers to Target Cancer Treatment: Modeling Implications for Survival and Costs.

Authors:  Jeanette K Birnbaum; Foluso O Ademuyiwa; Josh J Carlson; Leslie Mallinger; Mark W Mason; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  Molecular portraits: the evolution of the concept of transcriptome-based cancer signatures.

Authors:  Angelika Modelska; Alessandro Quattrone; Angela Re
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Using a gene expression signature when controversy exists regarding the indication for adjuvant systemic treatment reduces the proportion of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a nationwide study.

Authors:  A Kuijer; A C M van Bommel; C A Drukker; M van der Heiden-van der Loo; C H Smorenburg; P J Westenend; S C Linn; E J Th Rutgers; S G Elias; Th van Dalen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 8.822

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.