Literature DB >> 26582839

Comparison of Two Culture Methods for Use in Assessing Microbial Contamination of Duodenoscopes.

Michaela A Gazdik1, Jana Coombs2, John P Burke3, Bert K Lopansri3.   

Abstract

Recent outbreaks of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections associated with duodenoscopes used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography have highlighted the challenge of cleaning and high-level disinfection of these instruments. The Food and Drug Administration has suggested that duodenoscope surveillance by microbiological culturing, along with strict adherence to reprocessing protocols, may help reduce the risk of duodenoscope-associated infection transmission. We developed and validated an effective, user-friendly duodenoscope sampling and culture protocol and compared its performance to the interim Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended guidelines. Our protocol resulted in a 65% recovery rate for Gram-negative organisms, demonstrating a 2-fold increased recovery rate compared to the CDC method. The implementation of this protocol may increase the feasibility of duodenoscope surveillance for microbiology laboratories and endoscopy departments.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26582839      PMCID: PMC4733207          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02754-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

1.  Guidelines of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy: recommendations for setting up cleaning and disinfection procedures in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  R Systchenko; B Marchetti; J N Canard; L Palazzo; T Ponchon; J F Rey; D Sautereau
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Surveillance cultures to monitor quality of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing.

Authors:  Frank M Moses; Jennifer Lee
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  C Aumeran; L Poincloux; B Souweine; F Robin; H Laurichesse; O Baud; G Bommelaer; O Traoré
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  ESGE-ESGENA guideline for quality assurance in reprocessing: microbiological surveillance testing in endoscopy.

Authors:  U Beilenhoff; C S Neumann; J F Rey; H Biering; R Blum; V Schmidt
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Endoscope disinfection and its pitfalls--requirement for retrograde surveillance cultures.

Authors:  A J Buss; M H Been; R P Borgers; I Stokroos; W J Melchers; F T Peters; A J Limburg; J E Degener
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Serious Pseudomonas infections associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  D C Classen; J A Jacobson; J P Burke; J T Jacobson; R S Evans
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis following retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  D E Doherty; J M Falko; N Lefkovitz; J Rogers; J Fromkes
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Control of a multi-hospital outbreak of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae type 2 in France, September to October 2009.

Authors:  A Carbonne; J M Thiolet; S Fournier; N Fortineau; N Kassis-Chikhani; I Boytchev; M Aggoune; J C Seguier; H Senechal; M P Tavolacci; B Coignard; P Astagneau; V Jarlier
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2010-12-02

9.  Outbreaks of contaminated broncho-alveolar lavage related to intrinsically defective bronchoscopes.

Authors:  J-C Cêtre; M-C Nicolle; H Salord; M Pérol; S Tigaud; G David; M Bourjault; P Vanhems
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa liver abscesses after diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in two patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction type 2.

Authors:  P Katsinelos; S Dimiropoulos; D Katsiba; M Arvaniti; P Tsolkas; I Galanis; B Papaziogas; V Limenopoulos; S Baltajiannis; I Vasilladis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Duodenoscope-Associated Bacterial Infections: A Review and Update.

Authors:  Jennifer T Higa; Michael Gluck; Andrew S Ross
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06

2.  Eliminating Duodenoscope-Associated Transmission of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE): In Search of an Optimal Strategy.

Authors:  Divyanshoo R Kohli; Thomas E Grys; Rahul Pannala
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  A Novel Protocol Obviates Endoscope Sampling for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Experience of a Center with a Prior Outbreak.

Authors:  Zachary L Smith; Arshish Dua; Kia Saeian; Nathan A Ledeboer; Mary Beth Graham; Murad Aburajab; Darren D Ballard; Abdul H Khan; Kulwinder S Dua
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Turbulent fluid flow is a novel closed-system sample extraction method for flexible endoscope channels of various inner diameters.

Authors:  Seo Yean Sohn; Michelle J Alfa; Richard Lai; Yacoob Tabani; Mohamed E Labib
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.363

5.  Sterile Reverse Osmosis Water Combined with Friction Are Optimal for Channel and Lever Cavity Sample Collection of Flexible Duodenoscopes.

Authors:  Michelle J Alfa; Harminder Singh; Zoann Nugent; Donald Duerksen; Gale Schultz; Carol Reidy; Patricia DeGagne; Nancy Olson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-11-07

6.  A Novel Flocked Swab Protocol Proves to Be an Effective Method for Culturing Elevator-Containing Endoscopes.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Lui; Christopher G Chapman; Irving Waxman; Uzma D Siddiqui
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 3.487

7.  Evaluation of an overnight non-culture test for detection of viable Gram-negative bacteria in endoscope channels.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Donald R Duerksen; Gale Schultz; Carol Reidy; Pat DeGagne; Nancy Olson; Zoann Nugent; Michelle J Alfa
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-01-30

8.  A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Duodenoscope Reprocessing Surveillance Methods.

Authors:  Travis J De Wolfe; Nasia Safdar; Megan Meller; John Marx; Patrick R Pfau; Eric M Nelsen; Mark E Benson; Anurag Soni; Mark Reichelderfer; Megan Duster; Deepak V Gopal
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-11-18

9.  Comparative Study of Microbiological Monitoring Results from Three Types of Sampling Methods after Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing.

Authors:  Su Ma; Lili Feng; Ziyi Jiang; Xian Gao; Xisha Long; Shaonan Zhuang; Wenxia Ding; Taiyao Chen; Zhaoshen Li; Lingjuan Zhang; Huijun Xi; Hongzhi Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  A narrative review on current duodenoscope reprocessing techniques and novel developments.

Authors:  Maarten Heuvelmans; Herman F Wunderink; Henny C van der Mei; Jan F Monkelbaan
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.887

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.