Literature DB >> 26576123

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Removal of Wooden Foreign Bodies in the Extremities with Hydro-Dissection Technique.

Hee Jin Park1, Sung Moon Lee2, So Yeon Lee1, Eun Seok Son3, Eun Chul Chung1, Myung Ho Rho1, Sun Joo Lee4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We described the technique of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous removal of the foreign bodies (FB) with hydro-dissection in the radiologic department and presented video files of several cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients referred to the radiology department for US evaluation and US-guided percutaneous removal of the FBs in the upper and lower extremities between November, 2006 and November, 2013 were included in this study. The procedures started with US evaluation for the exact location and shape of the FB. A 5 mm-sized skin incision was made at the site of the nearest point from the FB where no passing arteries or tendons were present. We adopted a hydrodissection technique to separate the FB from adjacent tissue using a 2% lidocaine solution. Injected anesthetics detached the FBs from surrounding tissue and thereby facilitated removal. After the tip of the mosquito forceps reached the FB, the wooden FBs were removed.
RESULTS: The mean time required for the entire procedure was approximately 20 minutes. There were no significant complications during the US-guided removal or long-term complications after the procedure. All 4 FBs were successfully removed from the soft tissue under US guidance.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous removal of the FBs with hydro-dissection in the radiology department is a less invasive and safe method over surgical removal in the operating room. Additionally, the use of a guide wire and serial dilator may help minimize soft tissue injury and facilitate the introduction of forceps.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foreign bodies; Intervention; Surgery; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26576123      PMCID: PMC4644755          DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Radiol        ISSN: 1229-6929            Impact factor:   3.500


INTRODUCTION

Retained foreign body (FB) is a complication of traumatic soft tissue injuries, including laceration and penetration injuries (1). FBs may be composed of wood, glass, metal, plastic, or gravel (12). Because many FBs are asymptomatic and some are radiolucent, FB detection is occasionally difficult (1). According to a previous study, about 38% of the FBs are initially overlooked and may result in inflammation and infection (3). It is well known that high-resolution and real-time ultrasound (US) is useful in the detection of the radiolucent FBs (45). Additionally, US is an effective imaging technique for localization of various types of embedded superficial FBs (5). Surgical removal of FBs in the operating room is an invasive and expensive procedure and sometimes carries the risk of surgical complications (2). US-guided percutaneous removal of FBs in the radiology department, which can be concurrently performed with diagnostic US, has many advantages over a conventional surgical procedure owing to the fact that US-guided procedures permit excellent visualization of major surrounding anatomic structures including arteries, veins, and nerves (1). The hydro-dissection technique, which can be used in carpal tunnel release or nerve release in meralgia paresthetica, is a very useful method for FBs that have been retained for an extended period of time and can be easily used during FB removal (46). In this article, we described the technique of US-guided percutaneous removal of the FBs with hydro-dissection in the radiologic department and presented video files of cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Inclusion criteria were as follows: cases that did not show a FB on plain radiography, the shape of the FB was elongated and did not cause damage to adjacent normal tissue, and the FB had a safe removal tract. Exclusion criteria were glass or metallic FBs. Because glass FB could be broken into pieces, which makes it difficult to be removed and irregular shaped FBs such as metal or glass might damage adjacent neural or vascular tissue. Four patients referred to the radiology department for US evaluation and US-guided percutaneous removal of the FBs in the upper and lower extremities between November, 2006 and November, 2013 were included in this study. The patients were referred by orthopedic surgeons. Two males and 2 females aged 10 to 74 years (mean 50.5 ± 28 years) were included. Radiographic examinations of the lesion were performed in all 4 patients. The histories of the patients and body location of the lesions were briefly described in Table 1. The mean interval between trauma onset and US-guided FB removal was 55 days (range, 10-120 days). This research was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of our medical center, and the requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective study design.
Table 1

Patient's Data with Wooden Foreign Bodies Removed with Ultrasonography-Guidance and Hydro-Dissection Technique

Patient No.SexAge (Year)LocationSize of Foreign Bodies (mm)MaterialKindTrauma HistoryTime Interval between Trauma and Removal (Day)
1M10Knee30WoodTreeSports injury10
2F64Wrist20WoodToothpickCleaning activity60
3M54Ankle10WoodTreeConstruction site120
4F74Wrist40WoodTreeDuring seed harvest30

US Evaluation and Removal of FBs

A musculoskeletal radiologist performed all diagnostic US and US-guided removal of the FBs using a Logiq E9 (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) imaging device equipped with linear 6-15 MHz probes. The diagnosis was confirmed by US by identifying FBs ranging from 10 mm to 40 mm. US-guided removal of the FBs in the radiology department was initiated with US evaluation for the exact location and shape of the FB. Adjacent major vascular structures and tendons were also evaluated. After disinfecting the overlying skin, local anesthetics (lidocaine chlorhydrate 2%, Huons, Jecheon, Korea) were injected around the targeted skin area. A 5 mm-sized skin incision was made at the site of the nearest point from the FB where no passing arteries or tendons were present. The incision was made large enough for mosquito forceps (Halsted-Mosquito Forceps, Solco Medical, Seoul, Korea, 12 cm) to be inserted and wide enough to accommodate the passage of the FB. We adopted a hydro-dissection technique to separate the FB from adjacent tissue using a 2% lidocaine solution (Figs. 1,2,3, Videos 1, 2 in the online-only Data Supplement). Injected anesthetics detached the FBs from surrounding tissue and thereby facilitated removal. If the FBs were located in a deeper portion of the soft tissue, such as the intramuscular layer, an 18-gauge spinal needle was introduced, through which a guide wire (0.03 inch, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) was inserted. After removal of the spinal needle, we created a tract for introducing mosquito forceps with serial dilators (7-12 Fr, Cook, Bloomington, IN, USA) along the guide wire. When the tip of the mosquito forceps reached the FB, the wooden FBs were removed. All procedures were performed under real-time US guidance. The mean time required for the entire procedure was approximately 20 minutes. Prophylactic oral antibiotics (penicillin and amoxicillin) were administered to all patients for 5 days to prevent infectious complications after the procedure. There were no significant complications during the US-guided removal or long-term complications after the procedure.
Fig. 1

Case of retained foreign body in 10-year-old male with complaint of knee pain after soccer.

A. Plain radiography reveals diffuse soft tissue swelling in pre-patellar area but discrete foreign body is not seen. B, C. Ultrasound shows linear echogenic foreign body (arrows) with posterior shadowing superficial to patellar tendon. There is skin defect (arrowheads) with sinus tract from distal end of foreign body. Foreign body was removed with ultrasound guidance and hydro-dissection techniques. See also Video 1 in the onlineonly Data Supplement. D. Removed wooden foreign body.

Fig. 2

Case of retained foreign body in 64-year-old female who complained of painful wrist swelling for 1 week. Patient had history of stab injury with toothpick.

A. Plain radiography reveals no discrete foreign body. B, C. Longitudinal (B) and transverse (C) ultrasonography show foreign body (arrows) surrounded by hypoechoic granulation tissue (asterisk). Foreign body was removed with ultrasound guidance and hydro-dissection techniques. Open arrow: median nerve, arrowhead: palmaris longus tendon. D. Removed wooden foreign body.

Fig. 3

Case of retained foreign body in 54-year-old male who complained of painful foot swelling for duration of 4 months. He received stab injury at construction site and removed rusted nail at time of original injury.

A, B. Longitudinal (A) and transverse (B) ultrasounds show echogenic foreign body (between markers, arrows) in abductor halluces longus muscle. As foreign body was located in deep area and adhesion with surrounding soft tissue was suspected due to long term presence of FB, serial dilators with guide wire were employed. C. Guide wire was inserted through 18-G spinal needle. D. After removal of 18-G spinal needle, tract was dilated with 7 to 12 Fr serial dilators introduced along guide wire. E. Mosquito forceps (Halsted-Mosquito Forceps, 12 cm) were used to remove FB. FB = foreign body

RESULTS

Foreign bodies of all 4 patients that were undetected on plain radiography, were detected with US. The sizes of each lesion were described in Table 1. All 4 FBs were successfully removed from the soft tissue under US guidance. All FBs were pure wooden materials. There was 1 case of a FB around the knee joint referred from a local medical center (LMC) after incision and drainage of the subcutaneous fat layer with the impression of focal abscess because the patient self-treated the lesion with local ointment himself for 3 days after a sports injury. The 30 mm-sized FB made of tree wood was located in the subcutaneous fat layer around the anteromedial portion of the patellar tendon (Fig. 1, Video 1 in the online-only Data Supplement). A case of FB in the wrist was referred from a LMC after intravenous antibiotic therapy for 2 months due to wrist infection, which developed after an injury during dish washing. A 20 mm-sized, toothpick-like wooden material was removed (Fig. 2). A 54-year-old man was referred to our department with clinical impression of cellulitis. He was injured with a rusty nail at a construction site 4 months prior to presentation. We removed a 10 mm-sized wooden FB from the left ankle and the patient was discharged from the hospital after intravenous antibiotics therapy for 1 month following the US-guided removal in the radiology department (Fig. 3, Video 2 in the online-only Data Supplement). The fourth case was a 74-year-old woman whose wrist was injured during the harvest of perilla seeds, which is a source of perilla oil rich in α-linolenic acid omega-3 fatty acids. She was treated with intravenous antibiotics for 1 month because of purulent discharge. We removed a 4 cm-sized wooden FB from the wrist.

DISCUSSION

Failure to find FBs in the soft tissue can result in many complications such as allergies and infections (27). Retained FBs can cause peritendinitis, tenosynovitis and in some cases neuroma or neuropathies (28). US is the first choice for detection of FBs in the soft tissue and has a sensitivity and specificity of more than 90% (910). On US, FBs appear as echogenic lesions with posterior shadowing (2). Chronic FBs are surrounded by a hypoechogenic halo, which results from granulomatous inflammation (11). US also aids in the evaluation of surrounding ligaments, tendons, and neurovascular structures that could hinder the safe removal of FBs (11). Since surgical removal of FBs can result in severe bleeding and surgical infection, it is recommended that small FBs be removed with narrow entry hole under US-guidance (12). US-guided FB removal from soft tissue is inexpensive, repeatable, and carries less risk. Moreover, if US-guided FB removal fails, surgical removal can be performed subsequently. Skin incision of the US-guided removal is less than a centimeter and results in minimal scar formation, which can be a serious cosmetic problem when FBs are surgically removed (2). Our successful results are encouraging and suggest a good model of practice in the radiology department. The hydro-dissection technique originated from blind steroid injection in the carpal tunnel to release compression of the median nerve (12). This technique can separate FBs from compressive surrounding structures throughout the entire length of the FBs to facilitate removal. For safe removal, the creation of a tract using a guide-wire and serial dilators was necessary because relatively large mosquito forceps were needed to contact the shallow end of the FBs to minimize tissue injury during removal of the FBs. No serious complication such as massive bleeding occurred during the creation of a tract. One limitation to this study was the small number of cases. Another limitation was a lack of long-term follow-up results. We could not evaluate whether unexpected complications developed after discharge from the hospital more than 6 month after the procedure because all patients were transferred back to the original referring LMCs. The third limitation was that our cases were limited to subacute or chronic stage of FB. However, Budhram and Schmunk (1) reported that they could safely remove acute stage (less than 2 hours) cutaneous FBs with US-guided bed side procedure in the emergency department. It is likely that the time interval from the injury to removal of the FB is not critical. In conclusion, the US-guided percutaneous removal of the FBs with hydro-dissection in the radiology department is a less invasive and safe method over surgical removal in the operating room. Additionally, the use of a guide wire and serial dilator may help minimize soft tissue injury and facilitate the introduction of forceps.
  10 in total

1.  Progressive ulnar neuropathy caused by delayed migration of a foreign body.

Authors:  K A Choudhari; T Muthu; M H Tan
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  US of soft-tissue foreign bodies and associated complications with surgical correlation.

Authors:  T D Boyse; D P Fessell; J A Jacobson; J Lin; M T van Holsbeeck; C W Hayes
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of foreign bodies in the hand.

Authors:  P W Bray; J L Mahoney; J P Campbell
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous neuroplasty of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve for the treatment of meralgia paresthetica: a case report and description of a new ultrasound-guided technique.

Authors:  Sean W Mulvaney
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  Wooden foreign bodies in soft tissue: detection at US.

Authors:  J A Jacobson; A Powell; J G Craig; J A Bouffard; M T van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Bedside ultrasound AIDS identification and removal of cutaneous foreign bodies: a case series.

Authors:  Gavin R Budhram; Jillian C Schmunk
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Diagnosis and treatment of retained foreign bodies in the hand.

Authors:  M A Anderson; W L Newmeyer; E S Kilgore
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Wooden foreign bodies: imaging appearance.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Peterson; Laura W Bancroft; Mark J Kransdorf
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Ultrasound-guided needle localization to aid foreign body removal in pediatric patients.

Authors:  O Kenechi Nwawka; Nii-Kabu Kabutey; Christopher M Locke; Ilse Castro-Aragon; Ducksoo Kim
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 1.286

10.  Ultrasound-guided removal of foreign bodies: personal experience.

Authors:  Leonardo Callegari; Anna Leonardi; Amedeo Bini; Chiara Sabato; Paolo Nicotera; Emanuela Spano'; Davide Mariani; Eugenio A Genovese; Carlo Fugazzola
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Foreign body removal with the assistance of ultrasound guidance and methylene blue staining in children-a cohort study.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Menglei Wang; Yuxi Su
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.479

2.  Removal of a Pencil Embedded in a Child's Foot: A Case Report.

Authors:  Koshi Ota; Hiroki Yokoyama; Akira Takasu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-30

3.  Foreign Body-Related Extremity Trauma in Children: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Anil Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Use of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Technique to Remove Extra-Peritoneal Foreign Bodies.

Authors:  Nguyen Thai Binh; Nguyen Minh Duc; Le Tuan Linh; Tran Viet Hung; Le Van Tuyen; Nguyen Hoang; Michael Eamon Kelly; Pham Minh Thong
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.