Literature DB >> 9423650

Wooden foreign bodies in soft tissue: detection at US.

J A Jacobson1, A Powell, J G Craig, J A Bouffard, M T van Holsbeeck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of ultrasound (US) for detection of wooden foreign bodies implanted in cadaveric specimens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Wooden foreign bodies were randomly placed in the plantar soft tissues of three cadaver feet by using 5-mm-long incisions. Ten foreign bodies were 2.5 x 1.0 mm (length x diameter); 10 were 5.0 x 1.0 mm. Ten incisions were performed without implantation of foreign bodies. Three musculoskeletal radiologists independently performed US in blinded fashion and recorded the presence of a foreign body. Each used 7.5- and 10-MHz linear-array transducers and was informed of the possible presence of a foreign body.
RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for detection of 2.5-mm-long foreign bodies were 86.7% and 96.7%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of 5.0-mm-long foreign bodies were 93.3% and 96.7%, respectively. Overall sensitivity was 90.0%, with specificity of 96.7%, accuracy of 92.3%, positive predictive value of 98.0%, and negative predictive value of 83.0%.
CONCLUSION: US can be used effectively to locate wooden foreign bodies as small as 2.5 mm in length. Given that many foreign bodies are radiographically undetectable, the accuracy and availability of US make it an excellent modality for evaluation of radiolucent foreign bodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9423650     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.206.1.9423650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  26 in total

1.  Bamboo splinter: ultrasound localization.

Authors:  Magge V Lakshmi; Gretchen A W Gooding
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2003-03-18

2.  An unusual cause of locking.

Authors:  R Jandhyala; A Wilson; S Bhagat; J Lavelle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography.

Authors:  M H Aras; O Miloglu; C Barutcugil; M Kantarci; E Ozcan; A Harorli
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Delayed manifestations of the "Nail-Slipper injury".

Authors:  Shabir Ahmed Dhar; Tahir Ahmed Dar; Asif Sultan; Mohammed Farooq Butt; Mohammed Ramzan Mir; Altaf Ahmed Kawoosa; Shaika Farooq
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-07-21

5.  Visibility of different foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region using plain radiography, CT, MRI and ultrasonography: an in vitro study.

Authors:  R Javadrashid; D F Fouladi; M Golamian; P Hajalioghli; M H Daghighi; Z Shahmorady; M T Niknejad
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 6.  Sonographic imaging of hand and wrist injuries: applications in the ER setting.

Authors:  Daniel Hillman; Matthew Rheinboldt; Andrew Petraszko
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-10-16

7.  Spontaneous migration of bullet from arm to forearm and its ultrasound guided removal.

Authors:  Sanjay Meena; Amit Singla; Pramod Saini; Samarth Mittal; Buddhadev Chowdhary
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-10-19

8.  A simplified training method for soft tissue foreign body detection using ultrasound in emergency medicine residency program.

Authors:  Shervin Farahmand; Shahram Bagheri-Hariri; Sadjad Mehran; Mona Arbab; Zahra Khazaeipour; Hamed Basir-Ghafouri; Morteza Saeedi
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2014-05-12

9.  Large wooden foreign body in the hand: recognition of occult fragments with ultrasound.

Authors:  Alex Dumarey; Michel De Maeseneer; Caroline Ernst
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-03-23

Review 10.  Imaging of musculoskeletal soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Marcin B Turecki; Mihra S Taljanovic; Alana Y Stubbs; Anna R Graham; Dean A Holden; Tim B Hunter; Lee F Rogers
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.