| Literature DB >> 34987918 |
Koshi Ota1, Hiroki Yokoyama1, Akira Takasu1.
Abstract
The foot is the most common anatomic site for foreign body embedment in both children and adults. An 11-year-old boy boy with a history of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), learning disorder, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was brought to our ED with a pencil deeply embedded in his right foot. The broken portion of the pencil was completely embedded in his right foot, with mild bleeding and it could not be extracted easily. The pencil was eventually mobilized via gentle back-and-forth twisting motion, which allowed successful removal of a significant portion of the embedded pencil. To establish the presence of a foreign body, as in each X-ray, the affected body part should be imaged in at least two directions. Based on the density of the embedded foreign body, ultrasound imaging should be considered.Entities:
Keywords: attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; autism spectrum disorder; children; foot; foreign body
Year: 2021 PMID: 34987918 PMCID: PMC8716160 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1A pencil embedded in a child’s foot.
1A) The end of the pencil was visible on the sole of the right foot;
1B) Lateral X-ray of the right foot. A stick-like foreign body is seen in the right foot (red arrow);
1C) Anteroposterior X-ray of the right foot. The foreign body was not visible;
1D) The fragment on the left is the broken external part of the pencil and the fragment on the right is the part that was embedded in the foot (orange arrow). The smaller right-most fragment is the part that broke off when trying to remove the pencil using mosquito forceps (blue arrow).
The capability of X-ray, CT, MRI and USG in visualizing metal, wood, plastic, stone, and glass.
+++: Excellent resolution of details and visibility, good demarcation from surroundings.
++: Good resolution of details and clear visibility, demarcation from surroundings.
+: Insufficient resolution of details and visibility, insufficient demarcation.
±: Details not resolved and bad visibility, bad demarcation from surroundings.
-: Invisible.
*: Depend on the size of materials. All materials could be detected by using USG when fragments were more than 3 mm in size.
| Imaging modalities | ||||
| Materials | X-ray | CT | MRI | USG |
| Metal | +++ | +++ | + | * |
| Wood | - | - | - | * |
| Plastic | ± | ++ | + | * |
| Stone | ++ | +++ | ++ | * |
| Glass | + | +++ | + | * |