Azim Celik1. 1. GE Healthcare, Antalya, Turkey. Azim.celik@ge.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the effect of key imaging parameters on the accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps using a phantom model combined with ADC calculation simulation and propose strategies to improve the accuracy of ADC quantification. METHODS: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences were acquired on a phantom model using single-shot echo-planar imaging DWI at 1.5 T scanner by varying key imaging parameters including number of averages (NEX), repetition time (TR), echo time (TE), and diffusion preparation pulses. DWI signal simulations were performed for varying TR and TE. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance diffusion signal and ADC maps were dependent on TR and TE imaging parameters as well as number of diffusion preparation pulses, but not on the NEX. However, the choice of a long TR and short TE could be used to minimize their effects on the resulting DWI sequences and ADC maps. CONCLUSION: This study shows that TR and TE imaging parameters affect the diffusion images and ADC maps, but their effect can be minimized by utilizing diffusion preparation pulses. Another key imaging parameter, NEX, is less relevant to DWI and ADC quantification as long as DWI signal-to-noise ratio is above a certain level. Based on the phantom results and data simulations, DWI acquisition protocol can be optimized to obtain accurate ADC maps in routine clinical application for whole body imaging.
PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the effect of key imaging parameters on the accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps using a phantom model combined with ADC calculation simulation and propose strategies to improve the accuracy of ADC quantification. METHODS: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences were acquired on a phantom model using single-shot echo-planar imaging DWI at 1.5 T scanner by varying key imaging parameters including number of averages (NEX), repetition time (TR), echo time (TE), and diffusion preparation pulses. DWI signal simulations were performed for varying TR and TE. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance diffusion signal and ADC maps were dependent on TR and TE imaging parameters as well as number of diffusion preparation pulses, but not on the NEX. However, the choice of a long TR and short TE could be used to minimize their effects on the resulting DWI sequences and ADC maps. CONCLUSION: This study shows that TR and TE imaging parameters affect the diffusion images and ADC maps, but their effect can be minimized by utilizing diffusion preparation pulses. Another key imaging parameter, NEX, is less relevant to DWI and ADC quantification as long as DWI signal-to-noise ratio is above a certain level. Based on the phantom results and data simulations, DWI acquisition protocol can be optimized to obtain accurate ADC maps in routine clinical application for whole body imaging.
Authors: Ivan Jambor; Harri Merisaari; Hannu J Aronen; Jukka Järvinen; Jani Saunavaara; Tommi Kauko; Ronald Borra; Marko Pesola Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Salil Soman; Samantha J Holdsworth; Stefan Skare; Jalal B Andre; Anh T Van; Murat Aksoy; Roland Bammer; Jarrett Rosenberg; Patrick D Barnes; Kristen W Yeom Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Maren M Sjaastad Andreassen; Lauren K Fang; Christopher C Conlin; Helen H Park; Grace S Ahn; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Igor Vidić; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Anne M Wallace; Michael Hahn; Tyler M Seibert; Neil Peter Jerome; Agnes Østlie; Tone Frost Bathen; Pål Erik Goa; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Anders M Dale Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Ashley T Tao; Yunhong Shu; Ek T Tan; Joshua D Trzasko; Shengzhen Tao; Robert D Reid; Paul T Weavers; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Emanuele Camerucci; Norbert G Campeau; Joshua D Trzasko; Erin M Gray; Matt A Bernstein; Petrice M Cogswell; Yunhong Shu; Thomas K Foo; John Huston Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: James M Holcomb; Ryan A Fisicaro; Logan E Miller; Fang F Yu; Elizabeth M Davenport; Yin Xi; Jillian E Urban; Ben C Wagner; Alexander K Powers; Christopher T Whitlow; Joel D Stitzel; Joseph A Maldjian Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 4.869
Authors: Arash Latifoltojar; Shonit Punwani; Andre Lopes; Paul D Humphries; Maria Klusmann; Leon Jonathan Menezes; Stephen Daw; Ananth Shankar; Deena Neriman; Heather Fitzke; Laura Clifton-Hadley; Paul Smith; Stuart A Taylor Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 5.315