Literature DB >> 23982322

Diffusion-weighted MRI and optimal b-value for characterization of liver lesions.

Bilal Kaya1, Zafer Koc2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is commonly used to distinguish between benign and malignant liver lesions. However, different b-values are recommended.
PURPOSE: To determine the most suitable b-value in DWI for differentiation of benign and malignant liver lesions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 124 lesions in 89 consecutive patients (43 men, 46 women; age, mean ± standard deviation, 58 ± 14 years) with a pathological or radiological diagnosis of malignant or benign focal liver lesions after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in this study. Routine abdominal MRI and DWI were performed using seven b-values (0, 50, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 s/mm(2)). Lesions were analyzed for benignity/malignity using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values with 10 b-value combinations and by measuring the lesion/normal parenchyma ADC ratio.
RESULTS: Mean ADC values were significantly different between malignant and benign lesions for all b-value combinations (P=0.000). The best b-value combination was 0 and 800 (Az=0.935). Using lower b-values such as 0 and 50 together with higher b-values ≥ 600 s/mm(2) was beneficial (Az=0.928 and 0.927). Mean ADC values were approximately 13% (1-15%) higher in total when b=0 and b=50 s/mm(2) were included in multiple b-value combinations.
CONCLUSION: In DWI, we recommend the use of b-values of 0 and 800 s/mm(2) as two b-values, or b=0, 50, 600, 800, and 1000 s/mm(2) as multiple b-values for distinguishing between benign and malignant liver lesions. Mean ADC value is 13% higher in total by additional use of b=0 and b=50 s/mm(2) in multiple b-value combinations. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  b-value; Optimization; cholangiocellular cancer; diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); focal lesions; hepatocellular cancer; liver; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); metastasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23982322     DOI: 10.1177/0284185113502017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  9 in total

1.  Effect of imaging parameters on the accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient and optimization strategies.

Authors:  Azim Celik
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 2.  [Diffusion-weighted imaging-diagnostic supplement or alternative to contrast agents in early detection of malignancies?]

Authors:  S Bickelhaupt; C Dreher; F König; K Deike-Hofmann; D Paech; H P Schlemmer; T A Kuder
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of b800 and b1500 DWI-MRI of the pelvis to detect residual rectal adenocarcinoma: a multi-reader study.

Authors:  David D B Bates; Jennifer S Golia Pernicka; James L Fuqua; Viktoriya Paroder; Iva Petkovska; Junting Zheng; Marinela Capanu; Juliana Schilsky; Marc J Gollub
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-02

4.  Automatized Hepatic Tumor Volume Analysis of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases by Gd-EOB MRI-A Deep-Learning Model to Support Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference Decision-Making.

Authors:  Uli Fehrenbach; Siyi Xin; Alexander Hartenstein; Timo Alexander Auer; Franziska Dräger; Konrad Froböse; Henning Jann; Martina Mogl; Holger Amthauer; Dominik Geisel; Timm Denecke; Bertram Wiedenmann; Tobias Penzkofer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Extended T2-IVIM model for correction of TE dependence of pseudo-diffusion volume fraction in clinical diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  N P Jerome; J A d'Arcy; T Feiweier; D-M Koh; M O Leach; D J Collins; M R Orton
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  3D variable flip angle T1 mapping for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions at 3T: comparison with diffusion weighted imaging.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Qing Yang; Yupei Zhang; Jun Liu; Mengxiao Liu; Juan Zhu
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.795

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating malignant from benign solid liver lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Farhad Nalaini; Fatemeh Shahbazi; Seyedeh Maryam Mousavinezhad; Ali Ansari; Mohammadgharib Salehi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 8.  Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of liver: Principles, clinical applications and recent updates.

Authors:  Anuradha Shenoy-Bhangle; Vinit Baliyan; Hamed Kordbacheh; Alexander R Guimaraes; Avinash Kambadakone
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-18

9.  Evaluation of the Effect of Patient Preparation Using Castor Oil on ADC Value of Focal Liver Lesion.

Authors:  Kawa Abdulla Mahmood; Rezheen Jamal Rashid; Salah Mohammed Fateh; Naser Abdullah Mohammed
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-02-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.