Literature DB >> 26571408

Early Bimodal Stimulation Benefits Language Acquisition for Children With Cochlear Implants.

Aaron C Moberly, Joanna H Lowenstein, Susan Nittrouer.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Adding a low-frequency acoustic signal to the cochlear implant (CI) signal (i.e., bimodal stimulation) for a period of time early in life improves language acquisition.
BACKGROUND: Children must acquire sensitivity to the phonemic units of language to develop most language-related skills, including expressive vocabulary, working memory, and reading. Acquiring sensitivity to phonemic structure depends largely on having refined spectral (frequency) representations available in the signal, which does not happen with CIs alone. Combining the low-frequency acoustic signal available through hearing aids with the CI signal can enhance signal quality. A period with this bimodal stimulation has been shown to improve language skills in very young children. This study examined whether these benefits persist into childhood.
METHODS: Data were examined for 48 children with CIs implanted under age 3 years, participating in a longitudinal study. All children wore hearing aids before receiving a CI, but upon receiving a first CI, 24 children had at least 1 year of bimodal stimulation (Bimodal group), and 24 children had only electric stimulation subsequent to implantation (CI-only group). Measures of phonemic awareness were obtained at second and fourth grades, along with measures of expressive vocabulary, working memory, and reading.
RESULTS: Children in the Bimodal group generally performed better on measures of phonemic awareness, and that advantage was reflected in other language measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Having even a brief period of time early in life with combined electric-acoustic input provides benefits to language learning into childhood, likely because of the enhancement in spectral representations provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26571408      PMCID: PMC4675676          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  16 in total

1.  Measuring what matters: effectively predicting language and literacy in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Amanda Caldwell; Christopher Holloman
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 1.675

2.  Spoken language scores of children using cochlear implants compared to hearing age-mates at school entry.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Jean S Moog; Julia Biedenstein; Christine Brenner; Heather Hayes
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2009-01-20

3.  A longitudinal study of the bilateral benefit in children with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Filip Asp; Elina Mäki-Torkko; Eva Karltorp; Henrik Harder; Leif Hergils; Gunnar Eskilsson; Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  Cochlear implants: current designs and future possibilities.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

6.  Influence of implantation age on school-age language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Donna Thal; John K Niparko; Laurie S Eisenberg; Alexandra L Quittner; Nae-Yuh Wang
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  The effects of bilateral electric and bimodal electric--acoustic stimulation on language development.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Christopher Chapman
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-08-26

8.  The role of early language experience in the development of speech perception and phonological processing abilities: evidence from 5-year-olds with histories of otitis media with effusion and low socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Lisa Thuente Burton
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children: criterion of candidacy derived from an observational study.

Authors:  Rosemary Elizabeth Susan Lovett; Deborah Anne Vickers; Arthur Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Benefits and detriments of unilateral cochlear implant use on bilateral auditory development in children who are deaf.

Authors:  Karen A Gordon; Salima Jiwani; Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-16
View more
  9 in total

1.  The Effect of Cochlear Implant Interval on Spoken Language Skills of Pediatric Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Kaitlyn A Wenrich; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.

Authors:  David L Horn; Daniel J Dudley; Kavita Dedhia; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Verbal Learning and Memory After Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults: Some New Findings with the CVLT-II.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Arthur Broadstock; Taylor Wucinich; Natalie Safdar; Kelly Miller; Luis R Hernandez; Kara Vasil; Lauren Boyce; Alexandra Davies; Michael S Harris; Irina Castellanos; Huiping Xu; William G Kronenberger; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effects of Early Acoustic Hearing on Speech Perception and Language for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Rosalie M Uchanski; Jill B Firszt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Development of Phonological, Lexical, and Syntactic Abilities in Children With Cochlear Implants Across the Elementary Grades.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Meganne Muir; Kierstyn Tietgens; Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Bilateral Cochlear Implants or Bimodal Hearing for Children with Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  René H Gifford
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2020-10-02

7.  Evaluation of the Facial Recess and Cochlea on the Temporal Bone of Stillbirths regarding the Percutaneous Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Gabriela Pereira Bom Braga; Eloisa Gebrim; Ramya Balachandran; Jack Noble; Robert Labadie; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-25

8.  Restricted Speech Recognition in Noise and Quality of Life of Hearing-Impaired Children and Adolescents With Cochlear Implants - Need for Studies Addressing This Topic With Valid Pediatric Quality of Life Instruments.

Authors:  Maria Huber; Clara Havas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-12

9.  Limiting asymmetric hearing improves benefits of bilateral hearing in children using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Melissa Jane Polonenko; Blake Croll Papsin; Karen Ann Gordon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.