Literature DB >> 26569436

Reasoning and memory: People make varied use of the information available in working memory.

Kyle O Hardman1, Nelson Cowan1.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is used for storing information in a highly accessible state so that other mental processes, such as reasoning, can use that information. Some WM tasks require that participants not only store information, but also reason about that information to perform optimally on the task. In this study, we used visual WM tasks that had both storage and reasoning components to determine both how ideally people are able to reason about information in WM and if there is a relationship between information storage and reasoning. We developed novel psychological process models of the tasks that allowed us to estimate for each participant both how much information they had in WM and how efficiently they reasoned about that information. Our estimates of information use showed that participants are not all ideal information users or minimal information users, but rather that there are individual differences in the thoroughness of information use in our WM tasks. However, we found that our participants tended to be more ideal than minimal. One implication of this work is that to accurately estimate the amount of information in WM, it is important to also estimate how efficiently that information is used. This new analysis contributes to the theoretical premise that human rationality may be bounded by the complexity of task demands. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26569436      PMCID: PMC4850104          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  35 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 2.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.

Authors:  Daniel Kahneman
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2003-09

3.  A rational account of memory predicts left prefrontal activation during controlled retrieval.

Authors:  Jared F Danker; Pat Gunn; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Time and cognitive load in working memory.

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Sophie Bernardin; Sophie Portrat; Evie Vergauwe; Valérie Camos
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Central and peripheral components of working memory storage.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; J Scott Saults; Christopher L Blume
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-05-26

6.  Detection of the number of changes in a display in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Kyle Hardman; J Scott Saults; Christopher L Blume; Katherine M Clark; Mackenzie A Sunday
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Richard D Morey; Candice C Morey; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

8.  Loss of visual working memory within seconds: the combined use of refreshable and non-refreshable features.

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Seven-year-olds allocate attention like adults unless working memory is overloaded.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Candice C Morey; Angela M AuBuchon; Christopher E Zwilling; Amanda L Gilchrist
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-01-01

10.  Time-based loss in visual short-term memory is from trace decay, not temporal distinctiveness.

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Lauren R Spiegel; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  1 in total

1.  Informed guessing in change detection.

Authors:  Stephen Rhodes; Nelson Cowan; Kyle O Hardman; Robert H Logie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.051

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.