Literature DB >> 29265829

Informed guessing in change detection.

Stephen Rhodes1, Nelson Cowan1, Kyle O Hardman1, Robert H Logie2.   

Abstract

Provided stimuli are highly distinct, the detection of changes between two briefly separated arrays appears to be achieved by an all-or-none process where either the relevant information is in working memory or observers guess. This observation suggests that it is possible to estimate the average number of items an observer was able to retain across a series of trials, a potentially highly informative cognitive characteristic. For each version of the change detection paradigm, for this estimate to be accurate, it is important to specify how observers use the information available to them. For some instantiations of this task it is possible that observers use knowledge of the contents of working memory even when they are in a guessing state, rather than selecting between the response alternatives at random. Here we test the suggestion that observers may be able to use their knowledge of the number of items in memory to guide guessing in two versions of the change detection task. The four experiments reported here suggest that participants are, in fact, able to use the parameters of the task to update their base expectation of a change occurring to arrive at more informed guessing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29265829      PMCID: PMC6013305          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  27 in total

1.  Organization of visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Y Jiang; I R Olson; M M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Binding in short-term visual memory.

Authors:  Mary E Wheeler; Anne M Treisman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-03

3.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  A detection theory account of change detection.

Authors:  Patrick Wilken; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Emily M Elliott; J Scott Saults; Candice C Morey; Sam Mattox; Anna Hismjatullina; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Penalized loss functions for Bayesian model comparison.

Authors:  Martyn Plummer
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Hierarchical encoding in visual working memory: ensemble statistics bias memory for individual items.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-04

8.  How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Richard D Morey; Candice C Morey; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

9.  An assessment of fixed-capacity models of visual working memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Richard D Morey; Nelson Cowan; Christopher E Zwilling; Candice C Morey; Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python.

Authors:  Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  4 in total

1.  How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes From an Extended Adversarial Collaboration.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Clément Belletier; Jason M Doherty; Agnieszka J Jaroslawska; Stephen Rhodes; Alicia Forsberg; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Pierre Barrouillet; Valérie Camos; Robert H Logie
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-06-08

Review 2.  Attention in working memory: attention is needed but it yearns to be free.

Authors:  Stephen Rhodes; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Item-Position Binding Capacity Limits and Word Limits in Working Memory: A Reanalysis of Oberauer ().

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-01-06

4.  Perceptual stimuli with novel bindings interfere with visual working memory.

Authors:  Peter Shepherdson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.