Literature DB >> 26566228

Pancreatic Steatosis and Fibrosis: Quantitative Assessment with Preoperative Multiparametric MR Imaging.

Jeong Hee Yoon1, Jeong Min Lee1, Kyung Bun Lee1, Sun-Whe Kim1, Mee Joo Kang1, Jin-Young Jang1, Stephan Kannengiesser1, Joon Koo Han1, Byung Ihn Choi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiparametric pancreatic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, including the T2*-corrected Dixon technique and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging, in the quantification of pancreatic steatosis and fibrosis, with histologic analysis as the reference standard, and to determine the relationship between MR parameters and postoperative pancreatic fistula.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the informed consent requirement was waived. A total of 165 patients (93 men, 72 women; mean age, 62 years) underwent preoperative 3-T MR imaging and subsequent pancreatectomy (interval, 0-77 days). Fat fractions, IVIM DW imaging parameters (true diffusion coefficient [D], pseudodiffusion coefficient [D*], and perfusion fraction [f]), pancreas-to-muscle signal intensity ratios on unenhanced T1-weighted images, and pancreatic duct sizes were compared with the fat fractions and fibrosis degrees (F0-F3) of specimens. In 95 patients who underwent pancreatoenteric anastomosis, MR parameters were compared between groups with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and those without. The relationship between postoperative pancreatic fistula and MR parameters was evaluated by using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Fat fractions at MR imaging showed a moderate relationship with histologic findings (r = 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.63, 0.78). Patients with advanced fibrosis (F2-F3) had lower D*([39.72 ± 13.64] ×10(-3)mm(2)/sec vs [32.50 ± 13.09] ×10(-3)mm(2)/sec [mean ± standard deviation], P = .004), f (29.77% ± 8.51 vs 20.82% ± 8.66, P < .001), and unenhanced T1-weighted signal intensity ratio (1.43 ± 0.26 vs 1.21 ± 0.30, P < .001) than did patients with F0-F1 disease. Clinically relevant fistula developed in 14 (15%) of 95 patients, and f was significantly associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval: 1.05, 1.30).
CONCLUSION: Multiparametric MR imaging of the pancreas, including imaging with the T2*-corrected Dixon technique and IVIM DW imaging, may yield quantitative information regarding pancreatic steatosis and fibrosis, and f was shown to be significantly associated with postoperative pancreatic fistulas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26566228     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  29 in total

Review 1.  Fat Quantification in the Abdomen.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Jonathan C Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-12

2.  Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy Based on Cross-Sectional Images.

Authors:  Ye Rim Chang; Jae Seung Kang; Jin-Young Jang; Woo Hyun Jung; Mee Joo Kang; Kyung Bun Lee; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Fat fraction mapping using magnetic resonance imaging: insight into pathophysiology.

Authors:  Timothy Jp Bray; Manil D Chouhan; Shonit Punwani; Alan Bainbridge; Margaret A Hall-Craggs
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Assessment of acute obstructive pancreatitis by magnetic resonance imaging: Predicting the occurrence of pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Zhenshan Shi; Xiumei Li; Yueming Li; Ruixiong You; Dairong Cao; Qunlin Chen; Kamisha Ramen; Vikash Sahadeo Loosa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01-09

5.  Influence of fat deposition on T1 mapping of the pancreas: evaluation by dual-flip-angle MR imaging with and without fat suppression.

Authors:  Mayumi Higashi; Masahiro Tanabe; Munemasa Okada; Matakazu Furukawa; Etsushi Iida; Katsuyoshi Ito
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Advanced MR Imaging of the Pancreas.

Authors:  Danielle V Hill; Temel Tirkes
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.266

7.  Pancreatic Stiffness Quantified with MR Elastography: Relationship to Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoenteric Anastomosis.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Ying Liu; Feng Gao; Yanqing Liu; Shengzhen Tao; Yue Li; Kevin J Glaser; Richard L Ehman; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Quantitative pancreatic MRI: a pathology-based review.

Authors:  Manil D Chouhan; Louisa Firmin; Samantha Read; Zahir Amin; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Obesity, metabolic disease and the pancreas-Quantitative imaging of pancreatic fat.

Authors:  Naomi S Sakai; Stuart A Taylor; Manil D Chouhan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  T1 mapping for diagnosis of mild chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Temel Tirkes; Chen Lin; Evan L Fogel; Stuart S Sherman; Qiushi Wang; Kumaresan Sandrasegaran
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.