Literature DB >> 26564943

Investigator Experiences and Attitudes About Research With Biospecimens.

Suzanne M Rivera1, Aaron Goldenberg2, Beth Rosenthal2, Heide Aungst2, Karen J Maschke3, Erin Rothwell4, Rebecca A Anderson4, Jeffrey Botkin4, Steven Joffe5.   

Abstract

To advance scientific knowledge about human diseases and effective therapeutic treatments, investigators need access to human biospecimens and associated data. However, regulatory and procedural requirements may impede investigators' efforts to share biospecimens and data within and across institutions. Although a number of studies have explored experiences and attitudes of study participants and others about biospecimen and data sharing, less is known about investigators' perspectives. We conducted an electronic survey to learn about investigators' experiences and attitudes about research with biospecimens and associated data. A total of 114 practicing scientists from a pool of 60 university medical schools with Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) participated. We found a high degree of variability in investigators' experiences with institutional review boards (IRBs) when seeking approval to conduct biospecimen research, as well as differences in approaches to informed consent for the collection of specimens. Participants also expressed concerns that the risks of biospecimen research may be overestimated by IRBs. This research suggests that the current regulatory environment for human research protections may require reconsideration with regard to standards for collection, use, and sharing of biospecimens and data.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biospecimens; informed consent; institutional review board; researcher attitudes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26564943      PMCID: PMC4646730          DOI: 10.1177/1556264615610199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  13 in total

1.  Advancing translational research collaborations.

Authors:  Lili M Portilla; Greg Evans; Benjamin Eng; Terry J Fadem
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Translational research: moving discovery to practice.

Authors:  E A Zerhouni
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 3.  Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?

Authors:  Mats G Hansson; Joakim Dillner; Claus R Bartram; Joyce A Carlson; Gert Helgesson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  One-time general consent for research on biological samples.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-04

5.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Consortium and the translational research model.

Authors:  Alexander A Kon
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.229

7.  Clarity and appeal of a multimedia informed consent tool for biobanking.

Authors:  Sarah A McGraw; Carol A Wood-Nutter; Mildred Z Solomon; Karen J Maschke; Jeannette T Bensen; Jeannette T Benson; Debra E Irwin
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

8.  Take another little piece of my heart: regulating the research use of human biospecimens.

Authors:  Gail H Javitt
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 9.  Ethical issues in the collection, storage, and research use of human biological materials.

Authors:  Eric M Meslin; Kimberly A Quaid
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  2004-11

10.  Biobanking Research and Human Subjects Protections: Perspectives of IRB Leaders.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Karen J Maschke; Jeffrey R Botkin; Aaron Goldenberg; Thomas H Murray; Suzanne M Rivera
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr
View more
  3 in total

1.  "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.

Authors:  Keymanthri Moodley; Shenuka Singh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  Ethical issues related to clinical research and rare diseases: 15th Gordon L. Snider Critical Issues Workshop, April 1, 2016, Bethesda, Maryland.

Authors:  Marilyn Coors; Larry Bauer; Kelly Edwards; Karen Erickson; Aaron Goldenberg; John Goodale; Kenneth Goodman; Christine Grady; David Mannino; Adam Wanner; Todd Wilson; Mark Yarborough; Maryan Zirkle
Journal:  Transl Sci Rare Dis       Date:  2017-12-18

3.  Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.

Authors:  Mila Petrova; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.