Literature DB >> 26564383

Pressure-Relief Features of Fixed and Autotitrating Continuous Positive Airway Pressure May Impair Their Efficacy: Evaluation with a Respiratory Bench Model.

Kaixian Zhu1,2,3, Sami Aouf1, Gabriel Roisman2, Pierre Escourrou2,3.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Pressure-relief features are aimed at improving the patient's comfort during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of these therapy features on fixed CPAP and autotitrating CPAP (APAP) treatment efficacy.
METHODS: Seven pressure-relief features applied by three CPAP devices were included in our study (Remstar Auto: C-Flex 3, C-Flex+ 3, A-Flex 3, P-Flex; AirSense 10: EPR 3; Prisma 20A: SoftPAP 2 and 3). In fixed CPAP, the devices were subjected to a 10-min bench-simulated obstructive apnea sequence (initial apnea-hypopnea index, AHI = 60/h) with and without pressure-relief features. In APAP, the sequence was lengthened to 4.2 h (initial AHI = 58.6/h). The residual AHI and mean/median pressure were compared with and without pressure-relief features.
RESULTS: Compared to conventional CPAP, where pressure was adjusted to be just sufficient to control the simulated obstructive events, C-Flex+ 3, P-Flex, and EPR 3 failed to normalize the breathing flow and did not reduce the AHI. The mean pressures with the three features, respectively, were 1.8, 2.6, and 2.6 cmH2O lower than the conventional CPAP. Compared to conventional APAP, similar levels of control were observed with pressure-relief features, apart from P-Flex where the delivered mean pressure was lower and residual AHI greater. The device-reported mean/median pressures in APAP with A-Flex 3, P-Flex, EPR 3, and SoftPAP 3 were higher than that measured on the bench.
CONCLUSIONS: Pressure-relief features may attenuate CPAP efficacy if not adjusted for at the time of their introduction. In clinical practice, efficacy can be ensured by increasing the therapeutic pressure delivered by fixed CPAP or by enabling the pressure-relief features prior to initial pressure titration. Device-reported pressures in APAP devices with pressure relief activated may overstate delivered pressures.
© 2016 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CPAP treatment; bench test; pressure-relief features

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26564383      PMCID: PMC4773618          DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.5590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med        ISSN: 1550-9389            Impact factor:   4.062


  30 in total

1.  Obstructive sleep apnea treated by independently adjusted inspiratory and expiratory positive airway pressures via nasal mask. Physiologic and clinical implications.

Authors:  M H Sanders; N Kern
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Bench model to simulate upper airway obstruction for analyzing automatic continuous positive airway pressure devices.

Authors:  Jordi Rigau; Josep M Montserrat; Holger Wöhrle; Diana Plattner; Matthias Schwaibold; Daniel Navajas; Ramon Farré
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Bench evaluation of flow limitation detection by automated continuous positive airway pressure devices.

Authors:  Frédéric Lofaso; Gilbert Desmarais; Karl Leroux; Vincent Zalc; Redouane Fodil; Daniel Isabey; Bruno Louis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Effect of air leak on the performance of auto-PAP devices: a bench study.

Authors:  Dale Coller; Dawn Stanley; Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Pressure-relief continuous positive airway pressure vs constant continuous positive airway pressure: a comparison of efficacy and compliance.

Authors:  Georg Nilius; Andreas Happel; Ulrike Domanski; Karl-Heinz Ruhle
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Treatment adherence and outcomes in flexible vs standard continuous positive airway pressure therapy.

Authors:  Mark S Aloia; Michael Stanchina; J Todd Arnedt; Atul Malhotra; Richard P Millman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  All APAPs Are Not Equivalent for the Treatment of Sleep Disordered Breathing: A Bench Evaluation of Eleven Commercially Available Devices.

Authors:  Kaixian Zhu; Gabriel Roisman; Sami Aouf; Pierre Escourrou
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  Progressive retropalatal narrowing preceding obstructive apnea.

Authors:  M J Morrell; Y Arabi; B Zahn; M S Badr
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Response of automatic continuous positive airway pressure devices to different sleep breathing patterns: a bench study.

Authors:  Ramon Farré; Josep M Montserrat; Jordi Rigau; Xavier Trepat; Paula Pinto; Daniel Navajas
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Efficacy and patient satisfaction with autoadjusting CPAP with variable expiratory pressure vs standard CPAP: a two-night randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  A T Mulgrew; R Cheema; J Fleetham; C F Ryan; N T Ayas
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.816

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  APAP, BPAP, CPAP, and New Modes of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy.

Authors:  Karin G Johnson
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Use of the WatchPAT to detect occult residual sleep-disordered breathing in patients on CPAP for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Matthew Epstein; Tariq Musa; Stephanie Chiu; Jacquelyn Costanzo; Christine Dunne; Federico Cerrone; Robert Capone
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 3.  Technology for noninvasive mechanical ventilation: looking into the black box.

Authors:  Ramon Farré; Daniel Navajas; Josep M Montserrat
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2016-03-11

4.  New physiological bench test reproducing nocturnal breathing pattern of patients with sleep disordered breathing.

Authors:  Shuo Liu; Yann Rétory; Amélie Sagniez; Sébastien Hardy; François Cottin; Gabriel Roisman; Michel Petitjean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.