Literature DB >> 26554006

Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosomal abnormalities by semiconductor sequencing of maternal plasma DNA.

Ai-hua Yin1, Chun-fang Peng2, Xin Zhao3, Bennett A Caughey4, Jie-xia Yang3, Jian Liu3, Wei-wei Huang3, Chang Liu3, Dong-hong Luo2, Hai-liang Liu2, Yang-yi Chen2, Jing Wu3, Rui Hou5, Mindy Zhang6, Michael Ai4, Lianghong Zheng5, Rachel Q Xue4, Ming-qin Mai3, Fang-fang Guo3, Yi-ming Qi3, Dong-mei Wang3, Michal Krawczyk4, Daniel Zhang4, Yu-nan Wang3, Quan-fei Huang7, Michael Karin8, Kang Zhang9.   

Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using sequencing of fetal cell-free DNA from maternal plasma has enabled accurate prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy and become increasingly accepted in clinical practice. We investigated whether NIPT using semiconductor sequencing platform (SSP) could reliably detect subchromosomal deletions/duplications in women carrying high-risk fetuses. We first showed that increasing concentration of abnormal DNA and sequencing depth improved detection. Subsequently, we analyzed plasma from 1,456 pregnant women to develop a method for estimating fetal DNA concentration based on the size distribution of DNA fragments. Finally, we collected plasma from 1,476 pregnant women with fetal structural abnormalities detected on ultrasound who also underwent an invasive diagnostic procedure. We used SSP of maternal plasma DNA to detect subchromosomal abnormalities and validated our results with array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). With 3.5 million reads, SSP detected 56 of 78 (71.8%) subchromosomal abnormalities detected by aCGH. With increased sequencing depth up to 10 million reads and restriction of the size of abnormalities to more than 1 Mb, sensitivity improved to 69 of 73 (94.5%). Of 55 false-positive samples, 35 were caused by deletions/duplications present in maternal DNA, indicating the necessity of a validation test to exclude maternal karyotype abnormalities. This study shows that detection of fetal subchromosomal abnormalities is a viable extension of NIPT based on SSP. Although we focused on the application of cell-free DNA sequencing for NIPT, we believe that this method has broader applications for genetic diagnosis, such as analysis of circulating tumor DNA for detection of cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NIPT; cell-free DNA; maternal plasma DNA; noninvasive prenatal testing; semiconductor sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26554006      PMCID: PMC4664371          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1518151112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  29 in total

1.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of a fetal microdeletion syndrome.

Authors:  David Peters; Tianjiao Chu; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Nancy Hendrix; W Allen Hogge; Urvashi Surti; Kimberly Bunce; Mary Dunkel; Patricia Shaw; Aleksandar Rajkovic
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus.

Authors:  Y M Dennis Lo; K C Allen Chan; Hao Sun; Eric Z Chen; Peiyong Jiang; Fiona M F Lun; Yama W Zheng; Tak Y Leung; Tze K Lau; Charles R Cantor; Rossa W K Chiu
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  From prenatal genomic diagnosis to fetal personalized medicine: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  Copy number variants and genetic traits: closer to the resolution of phenotypic to genotypic variability.

Authors:  Jacques S Beckmann; Xavier Estivill; Stylianos E Antonarakis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Association of EGFR L858R Mutation in Circulating Free DNA With Survival in the EURTAC Trial.

Authors:  Niki Karachaliou; Clara Mayo-de las Casas; Cristina Queralt; Itziar de Aguirre; Boris Melloni; Felipe Cardenal; Ramon Garcia-Gomez; Bartomeu Massuti; José Miguel Sánchez; Ruth Porta; Santiago Ponce-Aix; Teresa Moran; Enric Carcereny; Enriqueta Felip; Isabel Bover; Amelia Insa; Noemí Reguart; Dolores Isla; Alain Vergnenegre; Filippo de Marinis; Radj Gervais; Romain Corre; Luis Paz-Ares; Daniela Morales-Espinosa; Santiago Viteri; Ana Drozdowskyj; Núria Jordana-Ariza; Jose Luis Ramirez-Serrano; Miguel Angel Molina-Vila; Rafael Rosell
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies by semiconductor sequencing.

Authors:  Can Liao; Ai-hua Yin; Chun-fang Peng; Fang Fu; Jie-xia Yang; Ru Li; Yang-yi Chen; Dong-hong Luo; Yong-ling Zhang; Yan-mei Ou; Jian Li; Jing Wu; Ming-qin Mai; Rui Hou; Frances Wu; Hongrong Luo; Dong-zhi Li; Hai-liang Liu; Xiao-zhuang Zhang; Kang Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Authors:  David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi; R Lamar Parker; Jeffrey Wentworth; Rajeevi Madankumar; Craig Saffer; Anita F Das; Joseph A Craig; Darya I Chudova; Patricia L Devers; Keith W Jones; Kelly Oliver; Richard P Rava; Amy J Sehnert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources.

Authors:  Helen V Firth; Shola M Richards; A Paul Bevan; Stephen Clayton; Manuel Corpas; Diana Rajan; Steven Van Vooren; Yves Moreau; Roger M Pettett; Nigel P Carter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  WISECONDOR: detection of fetal aberrations from shallow sequencing maternal plasma based on a within-sample comparison scheme.

Authors:  Roy Straver; Erik A Sistermans; Henne Holstege; Allerdien Visser; Cees B M Oudejans; Marcel J T Reinders
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  43 in total

1.  Sequencing of short cfDNA fragments in NIPT improves fetal fraction with higher maternal BMI and early gestational age.

Authors:  Longwei Qiao; Qin Zhang; Yuting Liang; Ang Gao; Yang Ding; Nannan Zhao; Wei Zhang; Hong Li; Yaojuan Lu; Ting Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Experimental factors are associated with fetal fraction in size selection noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Longwei Qiao; Jun Mao; Minjuan Liu; Yinghua Liu; Xiaoyan Song; Hui Tang; Qing Zhang; Hong Li; Yaojuan Lu; Yuting Liang; Ting Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Replication Errors Made During Oogenesis Lead to Detectable De Novo mtDNA Mutations in Zebrafish Oocytes with a Low mtDNA Copy Number.

Authors:  Auke B C Otten; Alphons P M Stassen; Michiel Adriaens; Mike Gerards; Richard G J Dohmen; Adriana J Timmer; Sabina J V Vanherle; Rick Kamps; Iris B W Boesten; Jo M Vanoevelen; Marc Muller; Hubert J M Smeets
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The association between fetal fraction and pregnancy-related complications among Chinese population.

Authors:  Yan Jiang; Yidan Zhang; Qin Yang; Dan Zeng; Keyan Zhao; Xin Ma; Wei Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Next generation sequencing: Coping with rare genetic diseases in China.

Authors:  David S Cram; Daixing Zhou
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2016-08

6.  Increased nuchal translucency before 11 weeks of gestation: Reason for referral?

Authors:  Malou A Lugthart; Bo B Bet; Fleur Elsman; Karline van de Kamp; Bernadette S de Bakker; Ingeborg H Linskens; Merel C van Maarle; Elisabeth van Leeuwen; Eva Pajkrt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.242

7.  Performance Evaluation of NIPT in Detection of Chromosomal Copy Number Variants Using Low-Coverage Whole-Genome Sequencing of Plasma DNA.

Authors:  Hongtai Liu; Ya Gao; Zhiyang Hu; Linhua Lin; Xuyang Yin; Jun Wang; Dayang Chen; Fang Chen; Hui Jiang; Jinghui Ren; Wei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing by semiconductor sequencing in a genetic laboratory.

Authors:  Annelies Dheedene; Tom Sante; Matthias De Smet; Jean-François Vanbellinghen; Bernard Grisart; Sarah Vergult; Sandra Janssens; Björn Menten
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Detection of 22q11.2 microduplication by cell-free DNA screening and chromosomal microarray in fetus with multiple anomalies.

Authors:  W-J Wu; G-C Ma; Y-S Lin; C-H Yeang; Y-H Ni; W-C Li; H-D Tsai; S Shur-Fen Gau; M Chen
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 7.299

10.  Performances of NIPT for copy number variations at different sequencing depths using the semiconductor sequencing platform.

Authors:  Jiexia Yang; Jing Wu; Haishan Peng; Yaping Hou; Fangfang Guo; Dongmei Wang; Haoxin Ouyang; Yixia Wang; Aihua Yin
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.