Literature DB >> 27770035

Replication Errors Made During Oogenesis Lead to Detectable De Novo mtDNA Mutations in Zebrafish Oocytes with a Low mtDNA Copy Number.

Auke B C Otten1, Alphons P M Stassen1, Michiel Adriaens2, Mike Gerards2, Richard G J Dohmen1, Adriana J Timmer1, Sabina J V Vanherle1, Rick Kamps1, Iris B W Boesten1, Jo M Vanoevelen1, Marc Muller3, Hubert J M Smeets4,2.   

Abstract

Of all pathogenic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations in humans, ∼25% is de novo, although the occurrence in oocytes has never been directly assessed. We used next-generation sequencing to detect point mutations directly in the mtDNA of 3-15 individual mature oocytes and three somatic tissues from eight zebrafish females. Various statistical and biological filters allowed reliable detection of de novo variants with heteroplasmy ≥1.5%. In total, we detected 38 de novo base substitutions, but no insertions or deletions. These 38 de novo mutations were present in 19 of 103 mature oocytes, indicating that ∼20% of the mature oocytes carry at least one de novo mutation with heteroplasmy ≥1.5%. This frequency of de novo mutations is close to that deducted from the reported error rate of polymerase gamma, the mitochondrial replication enzyme, implying that mtDNA replication errors made during oogenesis are a likely explanation. Substantial variation in the mutation prevalence among mature oocytes can be explained by the highly variable mtDNA copy number, since we previously reported that ∼20% of the primordial germ cells have a mtDNA copy number of ≤73 and would lead to detectable mutation loads. In conclusion, replication errors made during oogenesis are an important source of de novo mtDNA base substitutions and their location and heteroplasmy level determine their significance.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  de novo mutations; mitochondrial DNA; next-generation sequencing; oogenesis; zebrafish

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27770035      PMCID: PMC5161276          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.194035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  44 in total

1.  Analysis of insertion-deletion from deep-sequencing data: software evaluation for optimal detection.

Authors:  Joseph A Neuman; Ofer Isakov; Noam Shomron
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Embryo developmental capability and pregnancy outcome are related to the mitochondrial DNA copy number and ooplasmic volume.

Authors:  Yukitaka Murakoshi; Kou Sueoka; Kaori Takahashi; Suguru Sato; Tomoyoshi Sakurai; Hiroto Tajima; Yasunori Yoshimura
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Microindel detection in short-read sequence data.

Authors:  Peter Krawitz; Christian Rödelsperger; Marten Jäger; Luke Jostins; Sebastian Bauer; Peter N Robinson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Skewed segregation of the mtDNA nt 8993 (T-->G) mutation in human oocytes.

Authors:  R B Blok; D A Gook; D R Thorburn; H H Dahl
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation is largely conserved at birth with rare de novo mutations in neonates.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Heidi Purcell; Lori Showalter; Kjersti M Aagaard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Rapid mitochondrial DNA segregation in primate preimplantation embryos precedes somatic and germline bottleneck.

Authors:  Hyo-Sang Lee; Hong Ma; Rita Cervera Juanes; Masahito Tachibana; Michelle Sparman; Joy Woodward; Cathy Ramsey; Jing Xu; Eun-Ju Kang; Paula Amato; Georg Mair; Ralf Steinborn; Shoukhrat Mitalipov
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 7.  The sites and topology of mitochondrial superoxide production.

Authors:  Martin D Brand
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 4.032

8.  Analysis of the whole mitochondrial genome: translation of the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine system to the diagnostic bench?

Authors:  Sara Seneca; Kim Vancampenhout; Rudy Van Coster; Joél Smet; Willy Lissens; Arnaud Vanlander; Boel De Paepe; An Jonckheere; Katrien Stouffs; Linda De Meirleir
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Very low-level heteroplasmy mtDNA variations are inherited in humans.

Authors:  Yan Guo; Chung-I Li; Quanhu Sheng; Jeanette F Winther; Qiuyin Cai; John D Boice; Yu Shyr
Journal:  J Genet Genomics       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 4.275

Review 10.  DNA polymerase gamma in mitochondrial DNA replication and repair.

Authors:  William C Copeland; Matthew J Longley
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2003-03-17
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Gaining Insight into Mitochondrial Genetic Variation and Downstream Pathophysiology: What Can i(PSCs) Do?

Authors:  Jesse D Moreira; Deepa M Gopal; Darrell N Kotton; Jessica L Fetterman
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 2.  mtDNA Heteroplasmy: Origin, Detection, Significance, and Evolutionary Consequences.

Authors:  Maria-Eleni Parakatselaki; Emmanuel D Ladoukakis
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29

3.  The molecular characterization of porcine egg precursor cells.

Authors:  Te-Sha Tsai; Jacqueline Johnson; Yvonne White; Justin C John
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-28

4.  Mutations of mitochondrial DNA are not major contributors to aging of fruit flies.

Authors:  Timo E S Kauppila; Ana Bratic; Martin Borch Jensen; Francesca Baggio; Linda Partridge; Heinrich Jasper; Sebastian Grönke; Nils-Göran Larsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mitochondrial DNA mutation exacerbates female reproductive aging via impairment of the NADH/NAD+ redox.

Authors:  Liang Yang; Xiaobing Lin; Haite Tang; Yuting Fan; Sheng Zeng; Lei Jia; Yukun Li; Yanan Shi; Shujing He; Hao Wang; Zhijuan Hu; Xiao Gong; Xiaoyan Liang; Yi Yang; Xingguo Liu
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 9.304

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.