Literature DB >> 11124035

From minichaperone to GroEL 3: properties of an active single-ring mutant of GroEL.

J Chatellier1, F Hill, N W Foster, P Goloubinoff, A R Fersht.   

Abstract

The next step in our reductional analysis of GroEL was to study the activity of an isolated single seven-membered ring of the 14-mer. A known single-ring mutant, GroEL(SR1), contains four point mutations that prevent the formation of double-rings. That heptameric complex is functionally inactive because it is unable to release GroES. We found that the mutation E191G, which is responsible for the temperature sensitive (ts) Escherichia coli allele groEL44 and is located in the hinge region between the intermediate and apical domains of GroEL, appears to function by weakening the binding of GroES, without destabilizing the overall structure of GroEL44 mutant. We introduced, therefore, the mutation E191G into GroEL(SR1) in order to generate a single-ring mutant that may have weaker binding of GroES and hence be active. The new single-ring mutant, GroEL(SR44), was indeed effective in refolding both heat and dithiothreitol-denatured mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase with great efficiency. Further, unlike all smaller constructs of GroEL, the expression of GroEL(SR44) in E. coli that contained no endogenous GroEL restored biological viability, but not as efficiently as does wild-type GroEL. We envisage the notional evolution of the structure and properties of GroEL. The minichaperone core acts as a primitive chaperone by providing a binding surface for denatured states that prevents their self-aggregation. The assembly of seven minichaperones into a ring then enhances substrate binding by introducing avidity. The acquisition of binding sites for ATP then allows the modulation of substrate binding by introducing the allosteric mechanism that causes cycling between strong and weak binding sites. This is accompanied by the acquisition by the heptamer of the binding of GroES, which functions as a lid to the central cavity and competes for peptide binding sites. Finally, dimerization of the heptamer enhances its biological activity. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11124035     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  12 in total

1.  The interaction of beta(2)-glycoprotein I domain V with chaperonin GroEL: the similarity with the domain V and membrane interaction.

Authors:  Masayo Gozu; Masaru Hoshino; Takashi Higurashi; Hisao Kato; Yuji Goto
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Stimulating the substrate folding activity of a single ring GroEL variant by modulating the cochaperonin GroES.

Authors:  Melissa Illingworth; Andrew Ramsey; Zhida Zheng; Lingling Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Facilitated oligomerization of mycobacterial GroEL: evidence for phosphorylation-mediated oligomerization.

Authors:  C M Santosh Kumar; Garima Khare; C V Srikanth; Anil K Tyagi; Abhijit A Sardesai; Shekhar C Mande
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  GroEL plays a central role in stress-induced negative regulation of bacterial conjugation by promoting proteolytic degradation of the activator protein TraJ.

Authors:  Doris Zahrl; Andrea Wagner; Michael Tscherner; Günther Koraimann
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  GroEL2 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Reveals the Importance of Structural Pliability in Chaperonin Function.

Authors:  Neeraja Chilukoti; C M Santosh Kumar; Shekhar C Mande
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Activation parameters for the spontaneous and pressure-induced phases of the dissociation of single-ring GroEL (SR1) chaperonin.

Authors:  Markandeswar Panda; Paul M Horowitz
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 7.  GroEL-assisted protein folding: does it occur within the chaperonin inner cavity?

Authors:  Victor V Marchenkov; Gennady V Semisotnov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.208

8.  Probing the dynamic process of encapsulation in Escherichia coli GroEL.

Authors:  Toshifumi Mizuta; Kasumi Ando; Tatsuya Uemura; Yasushi Kawata; Tomohiro Mizobata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Chaperonin GroEL reassembly: an effect of protein ligands and solvent composition.

Authors:  Nataliya Ryabova; Victor Marchenkov; Nina Kotova; Gennady Semisotnov
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2014-04-22

10.  Creating the Functional Single-Ring GroEL-GroES Chaperonin Systems via Modulating GroEL-GroES Interaction.

Authors:  Melissa Illingworth; Holly Ellis; Lingling Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.