Literature DB >> 26553532

Estimation of interaction effects using pooled biospecimens in a case-control study.

Michelle R Danaher1,2, Paul S Albert1, Aninyda Roy2, Enrique F Schisterman1.   

Abstract

Pooling, or physically mixing biospecimens, prior to evaluating biomarkers dramatically reduces biomarker evaluation cost, reduces the quantity of biospecimens required of each individual, and may reduce the percentage of laboratory measurements below the lower limit of detection. Motivated by a case-control study on miscarriage (binary outcome) and cytokines (continuous exposures), we are interested in estimating parameters in a logistic regression, where individuals with the same disease status (with or without a miscarriage) are paired and their pooled cytokine concentrations are assessed. Previous research has proposed a set-based logistic model to evaluate the relationship between a disease and pooled exposures. While the set-based logistic model is very useful for estimating main effects, it cannot estimate interactions of continuous exposures when both are measured in pools. Therefore, we propose using the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm to obtain estimators of all parameters in logistic regression model, including interactions effects. Using a simulation study, we present comparisons of efficiency under different scenarios where exposures have been measured in pools and individually. Our simulations show that randomly sampling half of the available biospecimens has less efficiency than pooling pairs of biospecimens stratified by disease status. The EM algorithm provides a method for estimating interaction effects when biospecimens have already been pooled for other reasons such as the gain in efficiency for estimating main effects demonstrated by previous research. This manuscript demonstrates that the EM algorithm offers a promising approach to estimate interaction effects of pooled biospecimens.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cytokines; expectation maximization; logistic regression; pooling designs; skewed biomarkers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26553532      PMCID: PMC4821703          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  Using pooled exposure assessment to improve efficiency in case-control studies.

Authors:  C R Weinberg; D M Umbach
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Aspirin use and miscarriage risk.

Authors:  Sarah A Keim; Mark A Klebanoff
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Pooling biospecimens and limits of detection: effects on ROC curve analysis.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Assessment of skewed exposure in case-control studies with pooling.

Authors:  Brian W Whitcomb; Neil J Perkins; Zhiwei Zhang; Aijun Ye; Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Maternal serum paraxanthine, a caffeine metabolite, and the risk of spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  M A Klebanoff; R J Levine; R DerSimonian; J D Clemens; D G Wilkins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Binary regression analysis with pooled exposure measurements: a regression calibration approach.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  To pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens subject to a limit of detection.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 8.  A review of immune cells and molecules in women with recurrent miscarriage.

Authors:  S M Laird; E M Tuckerman; B A Cork; S Linjawi; A I F Blakemore; T C Li
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 15.610

9.  Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Sunni L Mumford; Neil J Perkins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Circulating chemokine levels and miscarriage.

Authors:  Brian W Whitcomb; Enrique F Schisterman; Mark A Klebanoff; Mona Baumgarten; Alice Rhoton-Vlasak; Xiaoping Luo; Nasser Chegini
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.