Literature DB >> 26551977

Assessing the Caprini Score for Risk Assessment of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medical Patients.

Paul J Grant1,2, M Todd Greene1,2, Vineet Chopra1,2,3, Steven J Bernstein1,2,3, Timothy P Hofer1,3, Scott A Flanders1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to assess risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients is unknown. We examined how well the Caprini risk assessment model predicts venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients.
METHODS: Between January 2011 and March 2014, venous thromboembolism events and risk factors were collected from non-intensive care unit medical patients hospitalized in facilities across Michigan. After calculation of the Caprini score for each patient, mixed logistic spline regression was used to determine the predicted probabilities of 90-day venous thromboembolism by receipt of pharmacologic prophylaxis across the Caprini risk continuum.
RESULTS: A total of 670 (1.05%) of 63,548 eligible patients experienced a venous thromboembolism event within 90 days of hospital admission. The mean Caprini risk score was 4.94 (range, 0-28). Predictive modeling revealed a consistent linear increase in venous thromboembolism for Caprini scores between 1 and 10; estimates beyond a score of 10 were unstable. Receipt of pharmacologic prophylaxis resulted in a modest decrease in venous thromboembolism risk (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.99; P = .04). However, the low overall incidence of venous thromboembolism led to large estimates of numbers needed to treat to prevent a single venous thromboembolism event. A Caprini cut-point demonstrating clear benefit of prophylaxis was not detected.
CONCLUSIONS: Although a linear association between the Caprini risk assessment model and the risk of venous thromboembolism was noted, an extremely low incidence of venous thromboembolism events in non-intensive care unit medical patients was observed. The Caprini risk assessment model was unable to identify a subset of medical patients who benefit from pharmacologic prophylaxis.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caprini risk assessment model; Deep venous thrombosis; Pharmacologic prophylaxis; Pulmonary embolism; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26551977      PMCID: PMC5331485          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  18 in total

1.  Individual risk assessment is the best strategy for thromboembolic prophylaxis.

Authors:  Joseph A Caprini
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.800

2.  Medical admission order sets to improve deep vein thrombosis prevention: a model for others or a prescription for mediocrity?

Authors:  Gregory A Maynard
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 3.  Assessment of venous thromboembolism risk and the benefits of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients.

Authors:  Alexander T Cohen; Raza Alikhan; Juan I Arcelus; Jean-François Bergmann; Sylvia Haas; Geno J Merli; Alex C Spyropoulos; Victor F Tapson; Alexander G G Turpie
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score.

Authors:  S Barbar; F Noventa; V Rossetto; A Ferrari; B Brandolin; M Perlati; E De Bon; D Tormene; A Pagnan; P Prandoni
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.824

5.  Derivation and validation of a simple model to identify venous thromboembolism risk in medical patients.

Authors:  Scott C Woller; Scott M Stevens; Jason P Jones; James F Lloyd; R Scott Evans; Valerie T Aston; C Gregory Elliott
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 6.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients and those with stroke: a background review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Frank A Lederle; Dylan Zylla; Roderick MacDonald; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Predictive and associative models to identify hospitalized medical patients at risk for VTE.

Authors:  Alex C Spyropoulos; Frederick A Anderson; Gordon FitzGerald; Herve Decousus; Mario Pini; Beng H Chong; Rainer B Zotz; Jean-François Bergmann; Victor Tapson; James B Froehlich; Manuel Monreal; Geno J Merli; Ricardo Pavanello; Alexander G G Turpie; Mashio Nakamura; Franco Piovella; Ajay K Kakkar; Frederick A Spencer
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Validation of the Caprini risk assessment model in Chinese hospitalized patients with venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Hai-Xia Zhou; Li-Qing Peng; Yu Yan; Qun Yi; Yong-Jiang Tang; Yong-Chun Shen; Yu-Lin Feng; Fu-Qiang Wen
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.944

9.  Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Nils Kucher; Sophia Koo; Rene Quiroz; Joshua M Cooper; Marilyn D Paterno; Boris Soukonnikov; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).

Authors:  William H Geerts; David Bergqvist; Graham F Pineo; John A Heit; Charles M Samama; Michael R Lassen; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  16 in total

1.  A decision model to estimate a risk threshold for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients.

Authors:  P Le; K A Martinez; M A Pappas; M B Rothberg
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Assessment of preoperative hypercoagulability in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using rapid thromboelastography (r-TEG).

Authors:  Yu Mou; Mao Li; Shengzhong Hou; Xue Ren; Bole Tian
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Low anti-Factor Xa level predicts 90-day Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients Receiving Enoxaparin Prophylaxis: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Kory I Fleming; Thomas K Varghese; John Stringham; Lyen C Huang; T Bartley Pickron; Ann Marie Prazak; Corinne Bertolaccini; Arash Momeni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Prognostic factors for VTE and bleeding in hospitalized medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea J Darzi; Samer G Karam; Rana Charide; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Mary Cushman; Michael K Gould; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Frederick A Spencer; Alex C Spyropoulos; Michael B Streiff; Scott Woller; Neil A Zakai; Federico Germini; Marta Rigoni; Arnav Agarwal; Rami Z Morsi; Alfonso Iorio; Elie A Akl; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Routine surveillance for diagnosis of venous thromboembolism after pleurectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Luis E De León; Carlos E Bravo-Iñiguez; Sam Fox; Jeffrey Tarascio; Samuel Freyaldenhoven; Moshe Lapidot; Michael T Jaklitsch; Raphael Bueno
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in the ICU: A Retrospective Study of Adult Medical Patients in 52 Hospitals.

Authors:  Sushant Govindan; Ashley Snyder; Scott A Flanders; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Risk models for VTE and bleeding in medical inpatients: systematic identification and expert assessment.

Authors:  Andrea J Darzi; Samer G Karam; Frederick A Spencer; Alex C Spyropoulos; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Scott C Woller; Neil A Zakai; Michael B Streiff; Michael K Gould; Mary Cushman; Rana Charide; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Federico Germini; Marta Rigoni; Arnav Agarwal; Rami Z Morsi; Elie A Akl; Alfonso Iorio; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-06-23

8.  The original and modified Caprini score equally predicts venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Sergey Tsaplin; Ilya Schastlivtsev; Sergey Zhuravlev; Victor Barinov; Kirill Lobastov; Joseph A Caprini
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2021-03-17

9.  Is guideline-driven prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism common practice in the South African private hospital setting?

Authors:  Melissa Van der Merwe; Marlene Julyan; Jesslee M Du Plessis
Journal:  S Afr Fam Pract (2004)       Date:  2020-10-12

10.  Assessment of the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Inpatients using the Padua Prediction Score and Caprini Risk Assessment Model.

Authors:  Haixia Zhou; Yuehong Hu; Xiaoqian Li; Lan Wang; Maoyun Wang; Jun Xiao; Qun Yi
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.