Literature DB >> 2239161

Microsurgery versus standard removal of the herniated lumbar disc. A 3-year comparison in 150 cases.

C Barrios1, M Ahmed, J Arrótegui, A Björnsson, P Gillström.   

Abstract

The outcome of 150 patients with herniated lumbar disc treated by either microsurgical or standard discectomy were retrospectively reviewed after an average of 3 years. Both techniques provided satisfactory results, with 85 percent good or excellent outcome. Microsurgery gave less intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospitalization, and more rapid return to work. The main drawback was a higher recurrence rate of disc prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2239161     DOI: 10.3109/17453679008993549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  16 in total

1.  Small bowel injury as a complication of lumbar microdiscectomy : case report and literature review.

Authors:  Duk-Sung Kim; Jung-Kil Lee; Kyung-Sub Moon; Jae-Kyun Ju; Soo-Han Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-03-31

2.  A history of lumbar disc herniation from Hippocrates to the 1990s.

Authors:  Eeric Truumees
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  The role of stem cell therapies in degenerative lumbar spine disease: a review.

Authors:  David Oehme; Tony Goldschlager; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Peter Ghosh; Graham Jenkin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Surgery for herniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis.

Authors:  R M Hoffman; K J Wheeler; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Is sequestrectomy a viable alternative to microdiscectomy? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Bahram Fakouri; Nitin R Shetty; Thomas C H White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: follow-up of 237 patients.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; S Valtonen; C A Carlson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 7.  A systematic review of randomised clinical trials using posterior discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations.

Authors:  Alberto Gotfryd; Osmar Avanzi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Lumbar microdiscectomy: subperiosteal versus transmuscular approach and influence on the early postoperative analgesic consumption.

Authors:  Marko Brock; Philip Kunkel; Luca Papavero
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Microdiscectomy compared with standard discectomy: an old problem revisited with new outcome measures within the framework of a spine surgical registry.

Authors:  F Porchet; V Bartanusz; F S Kleinstueck; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; D Grob; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes after automated open lumbar discectomy and conventional microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Sang-Ho Lee; Jun Seok Bae
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.