Literature DB >> 26547117

Automated 3D ultrasound image segmentation to aid breast cancer image interpretation.

Peng Gu1, Won-Mean Lee2, Marilyn A Roubidoux2, Jie Yuan3, Xueding Wang2, Paul L Carson4.   

Abstract

Segmentation of an ultrasound image into functional tissues is of great importance to clinical diagnosis of breast cancer. However, many studies are found to segment only the mass of interest and not all major tissues. Differences and inconsistencies in ultrasound interpretation call for an automated segmentation method to make results operator-independent. Furthermore, manual segmentation of entire three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound volumes is time-consuming, resource-intensive, and clinically impractical. Here, we propose an automated algorithm to segment 3D ultrasound volumes into three major tissue types: cyst/mass, fatty tissue, and fibro-glandular tissue. To test its efficacy and consistency, the proposed automated method was employed on a database of 21 cases of whole breast ultrasound. Experimental results show that our proposed method not only distinguishes fat and non-fat tissues correctly, but performs well in classifying cyst/mass. Comparison of density assessment between the automated method and manual segmentation demonstrates good consistency with an accuracy of 85.7%. Quantitative comparison of corresponding tissue volumes, which uses overlap ratio, gives an average similarity of 74.54%, consistent with values seen in MRI brain segmentations. Thus, our proposed method exhibits great potential as an automated approach to segment 3D whole breast ultrasound volumes into functionally distinct tissues that may help to correct ultrasound speed of sound aberrations and assist in density based prognosis of breast cancer.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D image segmentation; Assisted diagnosis; Breast ultrasound; Medical imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26547117      PMCID: PMC4702489          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2015.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  45 in total

1.  Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound.

Authors:  Karla Horsch; Maryellen L Giger; Luz A Venta; Carl J Vyborny
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound.

Authors:  K Horsch; M L Giger; L A Venta; C J Vyborny
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Segmentation of breast tumor in three-dimensional ultrasound images using three-dimensional discrete active contour model.

Authors:  Ruey Feng Chang; Wen Jie Wu; Woo Kyung Moon; Wei Ming Chen; Wei Lee; Dar Ren Chen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  3-D breast ultrasound segmentation using active contour model.

Authors:  Dar-Ren Chen; Ruey-Feng Chang; Wen-Jie Wu; Woo Kyung Moon; Wen-Lin Wu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Entropy-controlled quadratic markov measure field models for efficient image segmentation.

Authors:  Mariano Rivera; Omar Ocegueda; Jose L Marroquin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 10.856

Review 6.  [Technical progress and application of 3D ultrasound in breast imaging].

Authors:  Wei Chen; Zhaolian Ouyang; Yanbin Wang; Ranran Du; Hui Chi
Journal:  Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi       Date:  2013-07

7.  Comparative study of density analysis using automated whole breast ultrasound and MRI.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Yi-Wei Shen; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Sheng-Chy Luo; Aida Kuzucan; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  First-arrival traveltime sound speed inversion with a priori information.

Authors:  Fong Ming Hooi; Paul L Carson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Karen Drukker; Maryellen L Giger; Carl J Vyborny; Ellen B Mendelson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Relationships between circulating hormone levels, mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Harriet Johansson; Sara Gandini; Bernardo Bonanni; Frederique Mariette; Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga; Davide Serrano; Enrico Cassano; Francesca Ramazzotto; Laura Baglietto; Maria Teresa Sandri; Andrea Decensi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Methods for the segmentation and classification of breast ultrasound images: a review.

Authors:  Ademola E Ilesanmi; Utairat Chaumrattanakul; Stanislav S Makhanov
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-01-11

Review 2.  Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology.

Authors:  Garry Choy; Omid Khalilzadeh; Mark Michalski; Synho Do; Anthony E Samir; Oleg S Pianykh; J Raymond Geis; Pari V Pandharipande; James A Brink; Keith J Dreyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Acoustic beam anomalies in automated breast imaging.

Authors:  Rungroj Jintamethasawat; Xiaohui Zhang; Paul L Carson; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-12

4.  Performance of novel deep learning network with the incorporation of the automatic segmentation network for diagnosis of breast cancer in automated breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Qiucheng Wang; He Chen; Gongning Luo; Bo Li; Haitao Shang; Hua Shao; Shanshan Sun; Zhongshuai Wang; Kuanquan Wang; Wen Cheng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  A Low Cost Structurally Optimized Design for Diverse Filter Types.

Authors:  Majida Kazmi; Arshad Aziz; Pervez Akhtar; Nassar Ikram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A data-driven ultrasound approach discriminates pathological high grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jun Akatsuka; Yasushi Numata; Hiromu Morikawa; Tetsuro Sekine; Shigenori Kayama; Hikaru Mikami; Masato Yanagi; Yuki Endo; Hayato Takeda; Yuka Toyama; Ruri Yamaguchi; Go Kimura; Yukihiro Kondo; Yoichiro Yamamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  3D Shape-Weighted Level Set Method for Breast MRI 3D Tumor Segmentation.

Authors:  Chuin-Mu Wang; Chieh-Ling Huang; Sheng-Chih Yang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.682

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.