Literature DB >> 15147617

Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound.

Karen Drukker1, Maryellen L Giger, Carl J Vyborny, Ellen B Mendelson.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate a two-stage computerized method that first detects suspicious regions on ultrasound images, and subsequently distinguishes among different lesion types.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The first stage of detecting potential lesions was based on expected lesion shape and margin characteristics. After the detection stage, all candidate lesions were classified by a Bayesian neural net based on computer-extracted lesion features. Two separate tasks were performed and evaluated at the classification stage: the first classification task was the distinction between all actual lesions and false-positive detections; the second classification task was the distinction between actual cancer and all other detected lesion candidates (including false-positive detections). The neural nets were trained on a database of 400 cases (757 images), consisting of complex cysts and benign and malignant lesions, and tested on an independent database of 458 cases (1,740 images including 578 normal images).
RESULTS: In the distinction between all actual lesions and false-positive detections, Az values of 0.94 and 0.91 were obtained with the training and testing data sets, respectively. Sensitivity by patient of 90% at 0.45 false-positive detections per image was achieved for this detection-plus-classification scheme for the testing data set. Distinguishing cancer from all other detections (false-positives plus all benign lesions) proved to be more challenging, and Az values of 0.87 and 0.81 were obtained during training and testing, respectively. Sensitivity by patient of 100% at 0.43 false-positive malignancies per image was achieved in the detection and classification of cancerous lesions for the testing dataset.
CONCLUSION: The results show promising performance of the computerized lesion detection and classification method, and indicate the potential of such a system for clinical breast ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15147617     DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00723-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  22 in total

1.  Computer-aided classification of breast masses: performance and interobserver variability of expert radiologists versus residents.

Authors:  Swatee Singh; Jeff Maxwell; Jay A Baker; Jennifer L Nicholas; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Exploring nonlinear feature space dimension reduction and data representation in breast Cadx with Laplacian eigenmaps and t-SNE.

Authors:  Andrew R Jamieson; Maryellen L Giger; Karen Drukker; Hui Li; Yading Yuan; Neha Bhooshan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  A review of breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Susan P Weinstein; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  Enhancement of breast CADx with unlabeled data.

Authors:  Andrew R Jamieson; Maryellen L Giger; Karen Drukker; Lorenzo L Pesce
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Breast US computer-aided diagnosis system: robustness across urban populations in South Korea and the United States.

Authors:  Nicholas P Gruszauskas; Karen Drukker; Maryellen L Giger; Ruey-Feng Chang; Charlene A Sennett; Woo Kyung Moon; Lorenzo L Pesce
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers.

Authors:  Neha Bhooshan; Maryellen L Giger; Sanaz A Jansen; Hui Li; Li Lan; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Classification of breast masses in ultrasound images using self-adaptive differential evolution extreme learning machine and rough set feature selection.

Authors:  Kadayanallur Mahadevan Prabusankarlal; Palanisamy Thirumoorthy; Radhakrishnan Manavalan
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-16

9.  Semiparametric estimation of the relationship between ROC operating points and the test-result scale: application to the proper binormal model.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Karla Horsch; Karen Drukker; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Breast ultrasound lesions recognition: end-to-end deep learning approaches.

Authors:  Moi Hoon Yap; Manu Goyal; Fatima M Osman; Robert Martí; Erika Denton; Arne Juette; Reyer Zwiggelaar
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.