Literature DB >> 26543250

Vacuum-Assisted Venous Drainage: A 2014 Safety Survey.

Rachel Gambino1, Bruce Searles1, Edward M Darling1.   

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of vacuum-assisted venous drainage (VAVD) and case reports describing catastrophic incidents related to VAVD, there is a lack of data cataloging specific safety measures that individuals and institutions have incorporated into their VAVD practices for the prevention of these incidents. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to survey the perfusion community to gather data on VAVD practices, and to compare these current practices with literature recommendations and the American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology (AmSECT) Standards and Guidelines. In September 2014, a survey was distributed via PerfList and PerfMail, and by direct e-mail to members of the New York State Society of Perfusionists, targeting certified clinical perfusionists in New York State. Survey topics pertaining to VAVD practice included 1) equipment, 2) pressure monitoring and alarms, 3) protocols, checklists, and documentation, and 4) VAVD-related incidents. Of ∼200 certified clinical perfusionists who live and/or work in New York State (NYS), 88 responded (42%). Most respondents (90.1%) report they use VAVD. Of these, 87.3% report that they monitor VAVD pressure, with 51.6% having audible and visual alarms for both positive and excessive negative pressures. At the institutional level, 61.2% of respondents reported that there is a protocol in place at for their team limiting negative pressure in the reservoir, 28.4% document VAVD pressure in the pump record, and AmSECT's three recommended VAVD checklist items are met with 53.7%, 55.1%, and 33.8% compliance. In conclusion, the results of this study reveal that the use of VAVD has increased and has become nearly universal in 2014. There is high compliance to some of the literature recommendations and AmSECT Standards and Guidelines, however, there are still some gaps between current practices and these recommendations. Continued improvement, both at the individual and institutional levels, will help to improve patient safety by preventing untoward events from occurring while using VAVD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CPB; VAVD; monitoring; perfusion; safety; vacuum-assisted venous drainage

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26543250      PMCID: PMC4631213     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  23 in total

1.  Investigation and quantification of the blood trauma caused by the combined dynamic forces experienced during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  J W Mulholland; W Massey; J C Shelton
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Laboratory work preceding the first clinical application of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Bernard J Miller
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Massive air embolism in a Fontan patient.

Authors:  Daniel F Downing
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2011-09

4.  Vacuum-assisted venous drainage in extrathoracic cardiopulmonary bypass management during minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Nicola Colangelo; Lucia Torracca; Elisabetta Lapenna; Stefano Moriggia; Giuseppe Crescenzi; Ottavio Alfieri
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Does vacuum-assisted venous drainage increase gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass?

Authors:  Timothy J Jones; Dwight D Deal; Jason C Vernon; Noel Blackburn; David A Stump
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Real-time data acquisition and alerts may reduce reaction time and improve perfusionist performance during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  J R Beck; K Fung; H Lopez; L B Mongero; M Argenziano
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cerebrovascular accident after vacuum-assisted venous drainage in a Fontan patient: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  M Jahangiri; A Rayner; B Keogh; C Lincoln
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Massive air embolism in a Fontan patient.

Authors:  Gregory S Matte; Barry D Kussman; Joseph W Wagner; Sharon L Boyle; Robert J Howe; Frank A Pigula; Sitaram M Emani
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2011-06

9.  Hemolysis at different vacuum levels during vacuum-assisted venous drainage: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  D Goksedef; S N Omeroglu; O O Balkanay; E S Denli Yalvac; Z Talas; A Albayrak; G Ipek
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Detection and elimination of microemboli related to cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Robert C Groom; Reed D Quinn; Paul Lennon; Desmond J Donegan; John H Braxton; Robert S Kramer; Paul W Weldner; Louis Russo; Seth D Blank; Angus A Christie; Andreas H Taenzer; Richard J Forest; Cantwell Clark; Janine Welch; Cathy S Ross; Gerald T O'Connor; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.