Literature DB >> 11131211

Investigation and quantification of the blood trauma caused by the combined dynamic forces experienced during cardiopulmonary bypass.

J W Mulholland1, W Massey, J C Shelton.   

Abstract

Blood is exposed to various dynamic forces during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Understanding the damaging nature of these forces is paramount for research and development of the CPB circuit. The object of this study was to identify the most damaging dynamic non-physiological forces and then quantify this damage. A series of in vitro experiments simulated the different combinations of dynamic forces experienced during CPB while damage to the blood was closely monitored. A combination of air interface (a) and negative pressure (P) caused the greatest rate of change in plasma Hb (deltap Hb) (4.94 x 10(-3) mg/dl/s) followed by negative pressure and then an air interface. Shear stresses, positive pressures, wall impact forces and a blood-nonendothelial surface caused the least damage (0.26 x 10(-3) mg/dl/s). An air interface showed no threshold value for blood damage, with the relationship between the size of the interface and the blood damage modelled by a second-order polynomial. However, negative pressure did exhibit a threshold value at -120 mm Hg, beyond which point there was a linear relationship. Investigating the reasons for the increased blood trauma caused by the low-pressure suction (LPS) system makes it clear how research into minimizing or completely avoiding certain forces must be the next step to advancing extracorporeal technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11131211     DOI: 10.1177/026765910001500603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perfusion        ISSN: 0267-6591            Impact factor:   1.972


  8 in total

1.  Vacuum-Assisted Venous Drainage: A 2014 Safety Survey.

Authors:  Rachel Gambino; Bruce Searles; Edward M Darling
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2015-09

Review 2.  Vacuum-assisted venous drainage and gaseous microemboli in cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Shigang Wang; Akif Undar
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2008-12

3.  A novel pump-driven veno-venous gas exchange system during extracorporeal CO2-removal.

Authors:  Alexander Hermann; Katharina Riss; Peter Schellongowski; Andja Bojic; Philipp Wohlfarth; Oliver Robak; Wolfgang R Sperr; Thomas Staudinger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  [Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation : System selection, (contra)indications, and management].

Authors:  T Staudinger
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  The relationships between air exposure, negative pressure, and hemolysis.

Authors:  Joshua R Pohlmann; John M Toomasian; Claire E Hampton; Keith E Cook; Gail M Annich; Robert H Bartlett
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 6.  Hemolysis in cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: a review in search of a treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Leen Vercaemst
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2008-12

7.  Peripheral cannulae selection for veno-arterial extracorporeal life support: a paradox.

Authors:  Yuri M Ganushchak; Eva R Kurniawati; Jos G Maessen; Patrick W Weerwind
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Combination of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Han Chen; Rong-Guo Yu; Ning-Ning Yin; Jian-Xin Zhou
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 9.097

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.