OBJECTIVE: The psychometric properties of two formats of developmental screening tools that may be used in follow-up clinics providing primary care to children born preterm are presented. METHODS: 28 children born extremely preterm (<27 weeks) attending a high-risk clinic at the time of their 18-24 month visit were administered the Child Development Review, Brigance Early Head Start Screen II, and Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition. RESULTS: Both screeners identified the majority of the sample as at-risk. The Brigance Screen II more accurately identified children at-risk compared with the Child Developmental Review (sensitivity: 1.00 and 0.44; specificity: 0.60 and 0.80; positive predictive value: 79% and 80%; negative predictive value: 100% and 44%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Screening assessments using direct skills assessment may be an efficient and effective method of identifying children with developmental delays, particularly high-frequency but lower severity difficulties, in high-risk follow-up care settings.
OBJECTIVE: The psychometric properties of two formats of developmental screening tools that may be used in follow-up clinics providing primary care to children born preterm are presented. METHODS: 28 children born extremely preterm (<27 weeks) attending a high-risk clinic at the time of their 18-24 month visit were administered the Child Development Review, Brigance Early Head Start Screen II, and Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition. RESULTS: Both screeners identified the majority of the sample as at-risk. The Brigance Screen II more accurately identified children at-risk compared with the Child Developmental Review (sensitivity: 1.00 and 0.44; specificity: 0.60 and 0.80; positive predictive value: 79% and 80%; negative predictive value: 100% and 44%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Screening assessments using direct skills assessment may be an efficient and effective method of identifying children with developmental delays, particularly high-frequency but lower severity difficulties, in high-risk follow-up care settings.
Authors: Betty R Vohr; Bonnie E Stephens; Rosemary D Higgins; Carla M Bann; Susan R Hintz; Abhik Das; Jamie E Newman; Myriam Peralta-Carcelen; Kimberly Yolton; Anna M Dusick; Patricia W Evans; Ricki F Goldstein; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Athina Pappas; Ira Adams-Chapman; Deanne E Wilson-Costello; Charles R Bauer; Anna Bodnar; Roy J Heyne; Yvonne E Vaucher; Robert G Dillard; Michael J Acarregui; Elisabeth C McGowan; Gary J Myers; Janell Fuller Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 4.406