BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability. Currently, there are no consistently effective rehabilitative treatments for chronic stroke patients. Our recent studies demonstrate that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitative training improves recovery of function in multiple models of stroke. Here, we evaluated the ability of VNS paired with rehabilitative training to improve recovery of forelimb strength when initiated many weeks after a cortical and subcortical ischemic lesion in subjects with stable, chronic motor deficits. METHODS: Rats were trained to perform an automated, quantitative measure of voluntary forelimb strength. Once proficient, rats received injections of endothelin-1 to cause a unilateral cortical and subcortical ischemic lesion. Then, 6 weeks after the lesion, rats underwent rehabilitative training paired with VNS (Paired VNS; n = 10), rehabilitative training with equivalent VNS delivered 2 hours after daily rehabilitative training (Delayed VNS; n = 10), or rehabilitative training without VNS (Rehab, n = 9). RESULTS: VNS paired with rehabilitative training significantly improved recovery of forelimb function compared with control groups. The Paired VNS group displayed an 86% recovery of strength, the Rehab group exhibited 47% recovery, and the Delayed VNS group exhibited 42% recovery. Improvement in forelimb function was sustained in the Paired VNS group after the cessation of stimulation, potentially indicating lasting benefits. No differences in intensity of rehabilitative training, lesion size, or MAP-2 expression were observed between groups. CONCLUSION: VNS paired with rehabilitative training confers significantly greater recovery of forelimb function after chronic ischemic stroke in rats.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability. Currently, there are no consistently effective rehabilitative treatments for chronic strokepatients. Our recent studies demonstrate that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitative training improves recovery of function in multiple models of stroke. Here, we evaluated the ability of VNS paired with rehabilitative training to improve recovery of forelimb strength when initiated many weeks after a cortical and subcortical ischemic lesion in subjects with stable, chronic motor deficits. METHODS:Rats were trained to perform an automated, quantitative measure of voluntary forelimb strength. Once proficient, rats received injections of endothelin-1 to cause a unilateral cortical and subcortical ischemic lesion. Then, 6 weeks after the lesion, rats underwent rehabilitative training paired with VNS (Paired VNS; n = 10), rehabilitative training with equivalent VNS delivered 2 hours after daily rehabilitative training (Delayed VNS; n = 10), or rehabilitative training without VNS (Rehab, n = 9). RESULTS: VNS paired with rehabilitative training significantly improved recovery of forelimb function compared with control groups. The Paired VNS group displayed an 86% recovery of strength, the Rehab group exhibited 47% recovery, and the Delayed VNS group exhibited 42% recovery. Improvement in forelimb function was sustained in the Paired VNS group after the cessation of stimulation, potentially indicating lasting benefits. No differences in intensity of rehabilitative training, lesion size, or MAP-2 expression were observed between groups. CONCLUSION: VNS paired with rehabilitative training confers significantly greater recovery of forelimb function after chronic ischemic stroke in rats.
Authors: James M Conner; Andrew Culberson; Christine Packowski; Andrea A Chiba; Mark H Tuszynski Journal: Neuron Date: 2003-06-05 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Seth A Hays; Navid Khodaparast; Andrea Ruiz; Andrew M Sloan; Daniel R Hulsey; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard Journal: Neuroreport Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: Kristofer W Loerwald; Elizabeth P Buell; Michael S Borland; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2018-07-29 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Daniel R Hulsey; Jonathan R Riley; Kristofer W Loerwald; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Daniel R Hulsey; Christine M Shedd; Sadmaan F Sarker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Eric C Meyers; Bleyda R Solorzano; Justin James; Patrick D Ganzer; Elaine S Lai; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Eric Meyers; Anil Sindhurakar; Rachel Choi; Ruby Solorzano; Taylor Martinez; Andrew Sloan; Jason Carmel; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker; Seth Hays Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Michael J Darrow; Miranda Torres; Maria J Sosa; Tanya T Danaphongse; Zainab Haider; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Seth A Hays; Andrea Ruiz; Thelma Bethea; Navid Khodaparast; Jason B Carmel; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 4.673