Literature DB >> 2653942

Endosonography and computed tomography of esophageal carcinoma. Preoperative classification compared to the new (1987) TNM system.

T L Tio1, P Cohen, P P Coene, J Udding, F C den Hartog Jager, G N Tytgat.   

Abstract

Transesophageal endosonography and computed tomography were performed preoperatively in 74 patients with an esophageal carcinoma. The results were correlated with the histology of resected specimens according to the new (1987) TNM classification. Endosonography was superior to computed tomography in the evaluation of the depth of tumor infiltration, especially in the early stages and in nonresectable carcinoma (overall accuracy: endosonography 89%, computed tomography 59%). Endosonography was also more accurate than computed tomography in the assessment of regional lymph node metastases (overall accuracy: endosonography 80%, computed tomography 51%). The incidence of lymph node metastasis increased with the progression of the depth of tumor infiltration. The definitive exclusion factor for endosonography is severe stenosis, which cannot be passed with the instrument (26% of the cases). In these cases computed tomography was superior to endosonography in diagnosing celiac lymph node metastasis (overall accuracy: computed tomography 82%, endosonography 68%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2653942     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)90515-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  46 in total

1.  Number of lymph node metastases determined by presurgical ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound is related to prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Natsugoe; H Yoshinaka; M Shimada; F Sakamoto; T Morinaga; S Nakano; C Kusano; M Baba; S Takao; T Aikou
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Oesophageal surgery.

Authors:  E J Simchuk; D Alderson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  W H Allum; S M Griffin; A Watson; D Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Surgical management of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Amit N Patel; John T Preskitt; Joseph A Kuhn; Robert F Hebeler; Richard E Wood; Harold C Urschel
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-07

Review 5.  Unresolved surgical issues in the management of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Authors:  J A Norton; R T Jensen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Preoperative staging of gastrointestinal tumors by endosonography.

Authors:  K Ziegler; C Sanft; M Zeitz; E O Riecken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of distal and celiac axis lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas R Puli; Jyotsna B K Reddy; Matthew L Bechtold; Mainor R Antillon; Jamal A Ibdah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas-R Puli; Jyotsna-Bk Reddy; Matthew-L Bechtold; Daphne Antillon; Jamal-A Ibdah; Mainor-R Antillon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Preoperative TN staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of miniprobe ultrasonography, spiral CT and MRI.

Authors:  Ling-Fei Wu; Bing-Zhou Wang; Jia-Lin Feng; Wei-Rong Cheng; Guo-Re Liu; Xiao-Hua Xu; Zhi-Chao Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Staging gastrointestinal cancer as a precondition for multimodal treatment.

Authors:  J R Siewert; A Sendler; H J Dittler; U Fink; H Höfler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.