Literature DB >> 7754619

Staging gastrointestinal cancer as a precondition for multimodal treatment.

J R Siewert1, A Sendler, H J Dittler, U Fink, H Höfler.   

Abstract

Staging gastrointestinal cancer is useful only if it has an impact on treatment. When applying modern multimodal therapies (i.e., neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or additive treatment), meticulous staging is mandatory. Preoperative staging should include all relevant prognostic factors. If possible, modern cellular biology-related parameters should also be investigated, although their validity has not yet been analyzed properly. Using such modern techniques as endoluminal ultrasonography or video-laparoscopy, a preoperative diagnostic accuracy of 85% can be achieved, providing a sound foundation for therapeutic decisions. Assessment by TNM staging (UICC) and surgical resection without residual tumor (UICC/R0) are crucial, as it has been shown by multivariate analyses that these factors have the most impact on prognosis. Postoperative staging is mainly done by pathohistologic evaluation of the surgical specimen. It is the basis for any postoperative adjuvant or additive therapy. In this paper the diagnostic methods and their validity are discussed in relation to the various gastrointestinal tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7754619     DOI: 10.1007/BF00308622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  40 in total

1.  Staging of esophageal carcinoma: comparison of results with endoscopic sonography and CT.

Authors:  V Vilgrain; D Mompoint; L Palazzo; Y Menu; B Gayet; P Ollier; H Nahum; F Fekete
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Radiological diagnosis and preoperative staging of oesophageal malignancies.

Authors:  J W Reeders; J F Bartelsman
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  [The endosonographic staging of pancreatic carcinoma].

Authors:  T Rösch; H J Dittler; R Lorenz; C Braig; T Gain; S Feuerbach; H Höfler; J R Siewert; M Classen
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1992-04-10       Impact factor: 0.628

4.  Detection of focal hepatic masses: prospective evaluation with CT, delayed CT, CT during arterial portography, and MR imaging.

Authors:  J P Heiken; P J Weyman; J K Lee; D M Balfe; D Picus; E M Brunt; M W Flye
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  H J Dittler; J R Siewert
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT.

Authors:  J F Botet; C J Lightdale; A G Zauber; H Gerdes; S J Winawer; C Urmacher; M F Brennan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  The Japanese experience with endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer.

Authors:  S Abe; C J Lightdale; M F Brennan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of laparoscopy for the staging of gastric cancer and for the detection of liver metastases.

Authors:  R A Possik; E L Franco; D R Pires; D R Wohnrath; E B Ferreira
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Local staging and assessment of resectability in carcinoma of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum by endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  T Rösch; R Lorenz; K Zenker; A von Wichert; H Dancygier; H Höfler; J R Siewert; M Classen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Implications of peritoneal cytology for staging of early pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  A L Warshaw
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.