Literature DB >> 26539413

Genetic characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O26:H11 strains isolated from animal, food, and clinical samples.

Alejandra Krüger1, Paula M A Lucchesi1, A Mariel Sanso1, Analía I Etcheverría1, Ana V Bustamante1, Julia Burgán1, Luciana Fernández1, Daniel Fernández1, Gerardo Leotta2, Alexander W Friedrich3, Nora L Padola1, John W A Rossen3.   

Abstract

The Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) may cause serious illness in human. Here we analyze O26:H11 strains known to be among the most reported STEC strains causing human infections. Genetic characterization of strains isolated from animal, food, and clinical specimens in Argentina showed that most carried either stx 1a or stx 2a subtypes. Interestingly, stx 2a-positive O26:H11 rarely isolated from cattle in other countries showed to be an important proportion of O26:H11 strains circulating in cattle and food in our region. Seventeen percent of the isolates harbored more than one gene associated with antimicrobial resistance. In addition to stx, all strains contained the virulence genes eae-β, tir, efa, iha, espB, cif, espA, espF, espJ, nleA, nleB, nleC, and iss; and all except one contained ehxA, espP, and cba genes. On the other hand, toxB and espI genes were exclusively observed in stx 2-positive isolates, whereas katP was only found in stx 1a-positive isolates. Our results show that O26:H11 STEC strains circulating in Argentina, including those isolated from humans, cattle, and meat products, present a high pathogenic potential, and evidence that cattle can be a reservoir of O26:H11 strains harboring stx 2a.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MLVA; O26:H11; Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli; cattle; genetic characterization; hemolytic uremic syndrome; microarray

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26539413      PMCID: PMC4612136          DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol        ISSN: 2235-2988            Impact factor:   5.293


Introduction

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are E. coli strains that can cause human diseases, like gastrointestinal illnesses and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). E. coli O157 has been the most commonly reported STEC serogroup since it was identified in the 1980s. However, the number of non-O157 STEC infections has increased substantially in the last years. The O26 is one of the few serogroups frequently reported in non-O157 cases (Rivas et al., 2010; EFSA, 2013; Gould et al., 2013; ISPCH, 2014). In particular, strains of serotype O26:H11/- have been associated with severe human diseases (Gerber et al., 2002; Zimmerhackl et al., 2010; Käppeli et al., 2011). All STEC strains are characterized by the ability to produce Shiga toxins (Stx). The Stx family consists of two major types: Stx1 and Stx2, which can be further divided into several subtypes. A single STEC strain may carry one or more Shiga toxin-encoding genes (stx) which are generally carried by prophages. Epidemiological studies indicate that different subtypes of stx are related to different clinical manifestations after STEC infection (Krüger and Lucchesi, 2015). Particularly, the stx2a subtype is associated with highly virulent strains and HUS. Characterization of stx genotypes showed that STEC O26 strains isolated from patients can harbor stx1a, stx2a or both, however, strains harboring only stx2a were significantly associated with HUS (Bielaszewska et al., 2013). Furthermore, Bielaszewska et al. (2013) identified a new highly virulent stx2a-positive O26 clone as an emerging cause of HUS in Europe. The production of Stx seems to be essential but not solely responsible for STEC pathogenicity. Other known and putative virulence factors are usually present in pathogenic STEC strains. Some of them, like the adhesin intimin encoded on a bacterial chromosomal pathogenicity island and the enterohemolysin EhxA encoded on a plasmid have been found in association with severe clinical disease in humans (Boerlin et al., 1999; Aldick et al., 2007). It is a well-known fact that ruminants are the main reservoir of STEC strains (Naylor et al., 2005). Some studies suggest that domestic animals serve as reservoir for human pathogenic O26 STEC strains (Leomil et al., 2005). The O26 STEC strains also seem to be widely distributed in cattle, since those strains have been isolated from bovines belonging to different animal categories and production systems (Monaghan et al., 2011; Fernández et al., 2012; Paddock et al., 2014; Bonardi et al., 2015; Ison et al., 2015). Moreover, O26:H11 strains have been isolated from beef and dairy products (Bosilevac and Koohmaraie, 2011; Madic et al., 2011; Mohammed et al., 2014). Several studies from Europe and the United States report that O26 strains isolated from food and cattle generally carry stx1 or both stx1 and stx2 genes; moreover, O26 strains harboring only stx2a have been rarely isolated from cattle and food (Pearce et al., 2006; Geue et al., 2009; Bonanno et al., 2015; Ison et al., 2015). Our aim was to characterize O26:H11 STEC strains isolated from cattle, food and humans to contribute to the global knowledge of virulence profiles and epidemiology of O26 strains circulating in Argentina.

Material and methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

E. coli O26:H11 strains were selected from STEC collections in Argentina. The strains had been isolated between 1995 and 2013, from cattle, meat, human, and farm environment (Table 1). Most of the strains had been previously characterized by PCR regarding the presence of stx1, stx2, eae, ehxA, and saa genes. Strains were stored at −70°C with 20% (v/v) glycerol and when necessary grown in Luria Bertani broth at 37°C overnight.
Table 1

Characteristics of O26:H11 STEC isolates tested in this study.

StrainPeriod of isolationSourceReferences
12009Milk-fed calf, Farm EFernández et al., 2012
22009–2010Ground, Farm EPolifroni et al., 2012
32009Milk-fed calf, Farm EFernández et al., 2012
41995–1996CalfBlanco et al., 2004
51995–1996CalfBlanco et al., 2004
61995–1996CalfBlanco et al., 2004
71995–1996CalfBlanco et al., 2004
81995–1996CalfBlanco et al., 2004
91995–1996CalfBlanco et al., 2004
102002–2009Human with diarrheaRivero et al., 2010
112002–2009Human with diarrheaRivero et al., 2010
122009Milk-fed calf, Farm DFernández et al., 2012
132009Milk-fed calf, Farm EFernández et al., 2012
142010Newborn calf, Farm AFernández et al., 2012
152010Newborn calf, Farm AFernández et al., 2012
162010Newborn calf, Farm DFernández et al., 2012
172009–2010Cow, Farm AFernández et al., 2012
182009Milk-fed calf, Farm EFernández et al., 2012
192010Newborn calf, Farm AFernández et al., 2012
202010Newborn calf, Farm BFernández et al., 2012
212010Newborn calf, Farm BFernández et al., 2012
222009Growing calf, Farm DFernández et al., 2012
232010Human with diarrheaThis study
242009Human with diarrheaThis study
252009CowThis study
262013BeefThis study
272013BeefThis study
282013Ground meatThis study
292009Calf feed, Farm EThis study
Characteristics of O26:H11 STEC isolates tested in this study.

Microarray-based characterization of virulence factors

Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted with the UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit (Mo Bio) or Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes were evaluated with a commercial oligonucleotide microarray for E. coli according to the manufacturer's protocol (CLONDIAG Escherichia coli combined Assay, Alere Technologies GmbH; Geue et al., 2010). The array contained 87 probes targeting virulence genes and 102 probes targeting antimicrobial resistance associated genes. Visualization of hybridization was achieved using the ArrayMate instrument (CLONDIAG GmbH) and signals were analyzed automatically. The results were converted into a binary numerical format (1– present, 0– absent) and further analyzed using BioNumerics (Version 6.6; Applied Maths).

stx subtyping

Specific PCR reactions were performed to identify stx1a, stx1b, and stx1c subtypes (Scheutz et al., 2012). The presence of stx2b, stx2e, stx2f, and stx2g subtypes was evaluated with the oligonucleotide microarray. This assay also detects stx2a, stx2c, and stx2d subtypes but does not discriminate among them. Therefore, strains positive with the probe that detects stx2a, c, d subtypes where further subtyped with specific PCR reactions (Scheutz et al., 2012).

Detection of eae-β gene

Strains were tested for the presence of the eae-β subtype by specific PCR using the primer set SK1/LP4 (Oswald et al., 2000).

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

Isolates carrying resistance genes were tested for resistance to several antimicrobials by the disk diffusion method according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2014). The following antimicrobial disks were used: ampicillin (10 μg), cephalothin (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanate (20 μg-10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), streptomycin (300 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25–23.75 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), colistin (10 μg), florfenicol (30 μg).

Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA)

For typing, an MLVA protocol that comprises nine variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) loci, seven loci proposed by Lindstedt et al. (2007), i.e., CVN001, 002, 003, 004, 007, 014, 015, and two additional loci proposed by Løbersli et al. (2012), i.e., CVN016 and 017 was used. The seven loci proposed by Lindstedt et al. (2007) were amplified as described by Bustamante et al. (2010) and the two additional ones according to González et al. (2014). PCR products were analyzed in 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels, and detected by silver staining (GenePrint STR Systems—Silver Stain Detection, Promega). Allelic variants identified for each VNTR were sequenced with the same primers used to amplify those regions (Macrogen, Inc.). The sequences obtained were analyzed using Chromas 2.32 software (Technelysium Pty. Ltd.) and allele sequences of each VNTR were aligned with the software Clustal W (Larkin et al., 2007) in order to identify the number of tandem repeat units (TR). Alleles were named according to the number of TR. The absence of an amplification product was considered a null allele (−2). The diversity index (D), based on Nei's marker diversity, was calculated for each locus using the formula D = 1–Σ(fra)2, where fra is the allelic frequency (Noller et al., 2003). The discriminatory power of the method was assessed using the Simpson diversity index (D) (Hunter and Gaston, 1988).

Results

Genetic characterization of virulence factors

Figure 1 shows the genes encoding virulence factors detected in the O26:H11 strains, clustered according to the Bionumerics analysis. Genes that were not found in any isolate are summarized in a footnote in the figure.
Figure 1

Cluster analysis of genes associated with virulence. B, E, H, and M indicate isolates obtained from bovine, environmental, human, and meat sources, respectively. Results for the lpf gene are not included because of the ambiguous signal observed for all strains. Genes not found in the any of the studied strains: bfpA, ccl, cdtB, cfaC, cnf 1, cof A, eaaA, eatA, epeA, espA_C_rodentium, espB_O157, espC, espF, espF_C_rodentium, etpD, fanA, fasA, fedA, fedF, f17-A, f17-G, fim41a, hlyE, ipaD, ipaH, ireA, iroN, K88ab, lngA ltcA, nfaE, nleB O157:H7, nleB Salmonella, perA, pet, pic, prf B, rpeA, saa, sat, senB, sepA, sfaS, sigA, sta1, sta2, stb, stx2b, stx2c, stx2d, stx2e, stx2f, stx2g, subA, tsh, vat, virF.

Cluster analysis of genes associated with virulence. B, E, H, and M indicate isolates obtained from bovine, environmental, human, and meat sources, respectively. Results for the lpf gene are not included because of the ambiguous signal observed for all strains. Genes not found in the any of the studied strains: bfpA, ccl, cdtB, cfaC, cnf 1, cof A, eaaA, eatA, epeA, espA_C_rodentium, espB_O157, espC, espF, espF_C_rodentium, etpD, fanA, fasA, fedA, fedF, f17-A, f17-G, fim41a, hlyE, ipaD, ipaH, ireA, iroN, K88ab, lngA ltcA, nfaE, nleB O157:H7, nleB Salmonella, perA, pet, pic, prf B, rpeA, saa, sat, senB, sepA, sfaS, sigA, sta1, sta2, stb, stx2b, stx2c, stx2d, stx2e, stx2f, stx2g, subA, tsh, vat, virF. The stx types identified with the array were in agreement with previous PCR results. Forty five percent of the isolates were stx1-positve, 52% stx2-positive, and one isolate (3%) was stx1 and stx2-positive. By using the PCR subtyping protocol, all stx1 genes corresponded to the stx1a subtype and all stx2 corresponded to the stx2a subtype. All tested isolates harbored the genes encoding for the adhesin Intimin (eae subtype β), and its receptor Tir (tir). Other adhesion related genes were also identified. The presence of efa1, espB, and iha genes was demonstrated in all isolates, whereas espP was found in all except the stx1 and stx2-positive isolate. The toxB gene was only observed in stx2-positive isolates. The fasA, fedA, fedF, fim41a, nfaE, and saa genes were not found. Among toxin-encoding genes, ehxA (encoding for a hemolysin) was present in 97% of the isolates and astA (encoding for EAST1, the enteroaggregative Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin 1) was detected in 72% of the isolates. The cba and celB genes associated with colicin activity were identified in 97 and 17% of the isolates, respectively. Also, one bovine isolate was positive for the gene encoding colicin M (cma) and one isolate obtained from human with diarrhea was positive for mchB, mchC, mchF, and mcmA microcin genes. Several type III secretion system components (translocators and effectors) were identified. All the strains were positive for cif, espA, espfO103, espJ, nleA, nleB, and nleC genes, and 76% of the isolates harbored tccP. The espI gene was only identified in stx2-positive strains. The etpD, a gene encoding for a type II secretion pathway-related protein, was not found. The iss and hemL genes were identified in 100 and 97% of the isolates, respectively. The katP gene, encoding a catalase peroxidase, was detected in stx1-positive isolates only.

Antimicrobial resistance

Five O26:H11 isolates (17%) carried more than two antimicrobial resistance genes, being blaTEM, strA-strB, and sul2 the most frequently detected (Table 2). Genes that were not found in any of the isolates are summarized in a footnote in the table. The integron integrase encoding gene (intI1) was detected in isolate 21. The antimicrobial susceptibilities of the five isolates carrying resistance genes were determined using disk diffusion method. Four isolates were resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents (Table 2), and most genetic resistances were phenotypically confirmed. The exception was isolate 23 (human isolate) that carried strA, strB, and sul2 genes but was susceptible for the tested antibiotics.
Table 2

Antibiotic resistance profiles present in O26:H11 STEC isolates.

IsolateSourceaGenotypic resistance profilebPhenotypic resistance profilec
4BblaTEM tetBAMP(R) AMC(R) CEF(I) TET(R)
21BblaTEM strA strB aadA1 tetA drfA1 sul1 sul2 floRAMP(R) AMC(I) CEF(I) TET(R) SXT(R) CMP(R) FFC(R)
23HstrA strB sul2
26MblaTEM strA strB tetB sul2AMP(R) AMC(I) CEF(I) S(R) TET(R) NAL(R) SXT(R)
27MblaTEM strA strB tetB sul2AMP(R) AMC(I) CEF(I) S(R) TET(R) NAL(R) SXT(R)

B, H, and M indicate isolates obtained from bovine, human, and meat sources, respectively.

The bla.

Resistent (R) and intermediate (I) results for ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), cephalothin (CEF), cefotaxime (CTX), cefoxitin (FOX), gentamicin (GEN), amikacin (AKN), streptomycin (S), nalidixic acid (NAL), ciprofloxacin (CIP), chloramphenicol (CMP), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (STX), nitrofurantoin (NIT), tetracycline (TET), colistin (COL), florfenicol (FFC).

Antibiotic resistance profiles present in O26:H11 STEC isolates. B, H, and M indicate isolates obtained from bovine, human, and meat sources, respectively. The bla. Resistent (R) and intermediate (I) results for ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), cephalothin (CEF), cefotaxime (CTX), cefoxitin (FOX), gentamicin (GEN), amikacin (AKN), streptomycin (S), nalidixic acid (NAL), ciprofloxacin (CIP), chloramphenicol (CMP), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (STX), nitrofurantoin (NIT), tetracycline (TET), colistin (COL), florfenicol (FFC).

MLVA typing

The isolates could be principally discriminated by alleles of loci CVN014 (DN = 0.83) and CVN016 (DN = 0.70), followed by those of CVN017 (DN = 0.63). On the other hand, loci CVN002 and CVN003 showed a null allele in all the isolates. MLVA typing divided the total number of strains into 19 distinct genotypes, 13 of them being unique (Figure 2). The Simpson's index of diversity, calculated for the combined typing set, showed a value of DS = 0.96. Three main clusters were obtained: one group included the stx2- positive isolates and one stx1-positive isolate (isolate 17); a second group, most of the stx1-positive strains and the stx1 and stx2-positive isolate (isolate 23) and a third group included three stx1-positive strains.
Figure 2

Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis–based clustering of STEC O26:H11 isolates investigated in this study. Similarities among MLVA profiles were calculated using categorical coefficients and UPGMA clustering method. B, E, H, and M indicate isolates obtained from bovine, environmental, human, and meat sources, respectively.

Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis–based clustering of STEC O26:H11 isolates investigated in this study. Similarities among MLVA profiles were calculated using categorical coefficients and UPGMA clustering method. B, E, H, and M indicate isolates obtained from bovine, environmental, human, and meat sources, respectively. Isolates with the same MLVA type may indicate they are clonal. For some isolates this was supported by revealing a time-spatial relationship and by their identical virulence profile (isolates 14 and 19 from dairy farm A; 26 and 27 from a same meat processing plant; 20 and 21 from dairy farm B; 16 and 22 from dairy farm D; 1 and 18 from dairy farm E; and 2 and 29 also from dairy farm E).

Discussion

STEC O26:H11 strains are considered among the most reported STEC strains involved in human infections worldwide. To our knowledge, there is no specific study of O26:H11 STEC strains in Latin America. Our aim was to determine the characteristics of E. coli O26:H11 strains circulating in Argentina in the period 1995–2013 to contribute to the global characterization of these strains. Subtyping of stx genes indicated that O26:H11 strains in our region mainly present either stx1a or stx2a genotypes, similar to O26:H11 strains reported in other countries (Bielaszewska et al., 2013; Bletz et al., 2013; Bonanno et al., 2015). The stx2d subtype, present in the new pathogenic O26:H11 clone circulating in France (Delannoy et al., 2015), was not detected in our collection. Genetic characterization showed that in addition to stx genes, O26:H11 strains harbored genes encoding other toxins, adhesins, and components related to the type III secretion system that contribute to their virulence. In particular, eae-β, tir, efa, iha, espB, cif, espA, espF, espJ, nleA, nleB, nleC, and iss genes were detected in all the isolates; and all except one contained ehxA, espP, and cba genes. The analysis based on the presence/absence of genes associated with virulence identified three main clusters, one containing the stx1a-positive isolates, another the stx2a-positive isolates and a third one the stx1a and stx2a-positive isolate (Figure 1). The toxB, espI, and katP genes were differentially distributed between stx1a-positive and stx2a-positive groups. The toxB and espI genes, previously associated with severe disease (Mundy et al., 2004; Michelacci et al., 2014), were exclusively present in stx2a-positive isolates. Conversely, the katP gene encoding for catalase-peroxidase was only detected in the stx1a-positive isolates. Heterogeneity in gene composition of STEC O26:H11 plasmids has been detected by Zhang et al. (2000). Considering the plasmidic markers ehxA, katP, espP, and etpD, two major subgroups of stx2a-positive strains were identified in Europe by Bielaszewska et al. (2013), one of them typical for the new virulent German clone. Noticeably, all the stx2a-positive strains of our study present a distinct profile, positive for ehxA and espP, but negative for katP and etpD genes. Thus, stx2a-positive strains of our Argentinian collection differ from the German clone, and also from the human-pathogenic strain recently identified in France (Delannoy et al., 2015), which is negative for all these plasmidic markers. The plasmid profile of stx1a-positive strains of our study (positive for ehxA, katP, espP, and negative for etpD) is the same that Zweifel et al. (2013) identified in the human stx1-positive strains from patients with HUS or bloody diarrhea in Switzerland. On the other hand, the unique stx1 and stx2-positive isolate was negative for all plasmidic genes (toxB, espP, katP, ehxA, etpD, saa, subAB, epeA) tested, suggesting the absence of a virulence plasmid like pO26-Vir, pO157, or pO113. The MLVA profiles found in the present study do not coincide with any of the profiles identified by Brandal et al. (2012) among ovine and human O26:H11 isolates from Norway. Although loci CVN001, 004, and 007 were monomorphic in both studies, the alleles were different. The loci CVN002 and CVN003 presented a null allele for all tested samples in our study, in agreement with results obtained by Løbersli et al. (2012) for O26 isolates. Available epidemiological information suggests that isolates forming clusters with identical MLVA profiles were derived from the same source and constitute a single clone. However, one cluster contained human stx1-positive isolates not epidemiologically related. In addition, two isolates (isolates 20 and 21) from the same farm had the same virulence and MLVA profiles but only isolate 21 had antimicrobial resistance genes. Although there is a possibility that these isolates are from the same clone and that isolate 21 acquired antimicrobial genes, it is also possible that MLVA typing is not discriminatory enough to distinguish both isolates from each other. Interestingly, major groups obtained by MLVA analysis were similar to those obtained by the analysis of virulence factors. Antimicrobial resistance genes were detected in five isolates obtained from two calves, two meat samples and one patient with diarrhea. Except for the human isolate, all other isolates showed phenotypic resistance profiles predicted by the corresponding genotypic profile. Among the antibiotics tested, all four isolates were resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and tetracycline and also showed intermediate resistance to cephalotin. The two meat isolates (isolates 26 and 27) were also resistant to streptomycin, nalidixic acid, and trimethropim-sulfamethoxazole. As we commented below, these two isolates also shared the same virulence and MLVA profiles. Considering the epidemiological link, as they were found in meat samples from the same meat processing plant, our results suggest that both isolates correspond to the same circulating strain. Previous reports showed that integrons can be frequently detected in STEC strains and that most of the integrons can contain the aadA1 gene alone, or in association with the drf A1 gene (Morabito et al., 2002; Cergole-Novella et al., 2011). In our study, the intI1 gene was detected in isolate 21 which was also positive for aadA1 and drf A1 genes. Strikingly, this isolate carrying an integron and showing multiple resistances to antimicrobials was obtained from a newborn calf. Our results highlight the presence of multi-antimicrobial resistant STEC in cattle and meat in agreement with previous studies reporting the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance among STEC strains (Zhao et al., 2001; Li et al., 2011; Sasaki et al., 2012). Although antibiotic therapy is discouraged for treatment of STEC infections, the presence of antimicrobial resistant STEC strains in animals represent a risk for animal and human health. The genes coding for antimicrobial resistance could be transferred to other pathogens. Moreover, antimicrobial resistant STEC strains may have a selective advantage over other bacteria in intestines of animals under antibiotic treatments (Zhao et al., 2001). Taking into account that the same classes of antimicrobial agents are used both in humans and animals, joint efforts should be made to reduce the inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents in animals (Aidara-Kane, 2014). In conclusion, we identified three different populations of native O26:H11 strains whose main differences were associated with genes present in mobile genetic elements. Although O26 strains harboring only stx2a subtype have been rarely isolated from cattle and food in Europe and the United States (Pearce et al., 2006; Geue et al., 2009; Chase-Topping et al., 2012; Ison et al., 2015), stx2a-positive strains have been an important proportion of O26:H11 strains circulating in farms in Argentina and showed to carry genes associated with high virulence, representing a potential risk for public health.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  47 in total

1.  Antimicrobial resistance in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 and O26 isolates from beef cattle.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Sasaki; Masaru Usui; Mariko Murakami; Mika Haruna; Akemi Kojima; Tetsuo Asai; Yukiko Yamada
Journal:  Jpn J Infect Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.362

2.  Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity.

Authors:  P R Hunter; M A Gaston
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Identification of two allelic variants of toxB gene and investigation of their distribution among Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Valeria Michelacci; Laura Grande; Rosangela Tozzoli; Antonella Maugliani; Alfredo Caprioli; Stefano Morabito
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O26:H11-Associated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: Bacteriology and Clinical Presentation.

Authors:  Lothar-Bernd Zimmerhackl; Alejandra Rosales; Johannes Hofer; Magdalena Riedl; Therese Jungraithmayr; Alexander Mellmann; Martina Bielaszewska; Helge Karch
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 4.180

5.  Prevalence and characterization of non-O157 shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates from commercial ground beef in the United States.

Authors:  Joseph M Bosilevac; Mohammad Koohmaraie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Genetic Diversity and Pathogenic Potential of Attaching and Effacing Escherichia coli O26:H11 Strains Recovered from Bovine Feces in the United States.

Authors:  Sarah A Ison; Sabine Delannoy; Marie Bugarel; Kendra K Nightingale; Hattie E Webb; David G Renter; Tiruvoor G Nagaraja; Guy H Loneragan; Patrick Fach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli in veterinary medicine.

Authors:  Stuart W Naylor; David L Gally; J Christopher Low
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.473

8.  Associations between virulence factors of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and disease in humans.

Authors:  P Boerlin; S A McEwen; F Boerlin-Petzold; J B Wilson; R P Johnson; C L Gyles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Detection of the emerging Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O26:H11/H- sequence type 29 (ST29) clone in human patients and healthy cattle in Switzerland.

Authors:  Claudio Zweifel; Nicole Cernela; Roger Stephan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Clinical course and the role of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection in the hemolytic-uremic syndrome in pediatric patients, 1997-2000, in Germany and Austria: a prospective study.

Authors:  Angela Gerber; Helge Karch; Franz Allerberger; Hege M Verweyen; Lothar B Zimmerhackl
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-08-02       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of genetic diversity among aquatic and fecal isolates of Escherichia coli using multilocus variable number of tandem repeat analysis.

Authors:  Neha Khare; Megha Kaushik; Sanjay Kumar; Pooja Gulati
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Genomic Investigation into the Virulome, Pathogenicity, Stress Response Factors, Clonal Lineages, and Phylogenetic Relationship of Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Meat Sources in Ghana.

Authors:  Frederick Adzitey; Jonathan Asante; Hezekiel M Kumalo; Rene B Khan; Anou M Somboro; Daniel G Amoako
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Occurrence of multiple drug-resistant Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli in raw milk samples collected from retail outlets in South India.

Authors:  Jomy Joseph; Sudha Kalyanikutty
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The Search for Herbal Antibiotics: An In-Silico Investigation of Antibacterial Phytochemicals.

Authors:  Mary Snow Setzer; Javad Sharifi-Rad; William N Setzer
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-12

5.  Population structure of Escherichia coli O26 : H11 with recent and repeated stx2 acquisition in multiple lineages.

Authors:  Yoshitoshi Ogura; Yasuhiro Gotoh; Takehiko Itoh; Mitsuhiko P Sato; Kazuko Seto; Shyuji Yoshino; Junko Isobe; Yoshiki Etoh; Mariko Kurogi; Keiko Kimata; Eriko Maeda; Denis Piérard; Masahiro Kusumoto; Masato Akiba; Kiyoshi Tominaga; Yumi Kirino; Yuki Kato; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Tadasuke Ooka; Nozomi Ishijima; Ken-Ichi Lee; Sunao Iyoda; Jacques Georges Mainil; Tetsuya Hayashi
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2017-11

6.  Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and genotyping of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in foods of cattle origin, diarrheic cattle, and diarrheic humans in Egypt.

Authors:  Walid Elmonir; Samar Shalaan; Amin Tahoun; Samy F Mahmoud; Etab M Abo Remela; Radwa Eissa; Hanem El-Sharkawy; Mustafa Shukry; Rasha N Zahran
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.181

7.  Antibiotic Resistance in Shiga Toxigenic Escherichia coli Isolates from Surface Waters and Sediments in a Mixed Use Urban Agricultural Landscape.

Authors:  Yvonne Ma; Jessica Chen; Karen Fong; Stephanie Nadya; Kevin Allen; Chad Laing; Kim Ziebell; Ed Topp; Laura M Carroll; Martin Wiedmann; Pascal Delaquis; Siyun Wang
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-26

8.  Genetic Relatedness and Novel Sequence Types of Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Strains Isolated in Argentina.

Authors:  Jimena S Cadona; Ana V Bustamante; Juliana González; A Mariel Sanso
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  Comparative genomics reveals differences in mobile virulence genes of Escherichia coli O103 pathotypes of bovine fecal origin.

Authors:  Lance W Noll; Jay N Worley; Xun Yang; Pragathi B Shridhar; Justin B Ludwig; Xiaorong Shi; Jianfa Bai; Doina Caragea; Jianghong Meng; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Recent Advances in Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Research in Latin America.

Authors:  Alfredo G Torres; Maria M Amaral; Leticia Bentancor; Lucia Galli; Jorge Goldstein; Alejandra Krüger; Maricarmen Rojas-Lopez
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2018-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.