INTRODUCTION: Digital three-dimensional models are widely used for orthodontic diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to appraise the accuracy of digital models obtained from computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for tooth-width measurements and the Bolton analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Digital models (CAD/CAM, CBCT) and plaster model were made for each of 50 subjects. Tooth-width measurements on the digital models (CAD/CAM, CBCT) were compared with those on the corresponding plaster models. The anterior and overall Bolton ratios were calculated for each participant and for each method. The paired t-test was applied to determine the validity. RESULTS: Tooth-width measurements, anterior, and overall Bolton ratio of digital models of CAD/CAM and CBCT did not differ significantly from those on the plaster models. CONCLUSION: Hence, both CBCT and CAD/CAM are trustable and promising technique that can replace plaster models due to its overwhelming advantages.
INTRODUCTION: Digital three-dimensional models are widely used for orthodontic diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to appraise the accuracy of digital models obtained from computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for tooth-width measurements and the Bolton analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Digital models (CAD/CAM, CBCT) and plaster model were made for each of 50 subjects. Tooth-width measurements on the digital models (CAD/CAM, CBCT) were compared with those on the corresponding plaster models. The anterior and overall Bolton ratios were calculated for each participant and for each method. The paired t-test was applied to determine the validity. RESULTS:Tooth-width measurements, anterior, and overall Bolton ratio of digital models of CAD/CAM and CBCT did not differ significantly from those on the plaster models. CONCLUSION: Hence, both CBCT and CAD/CAM are trustable and promising technique that can replace plaster models due to its overwhelming advantages.
Authors: Matthew Mayers; Allen R Firestone; Robert Rashid; Katherine W L Vig Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Daron R Stevens; Carlos Flores-Mir; Brian Nebbe; Donald W Raboud; Giseon Heo; Paul W Major Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Michael F Leifert; Melvyn M Leifert; Stella S Efstratiadis; Thomas J Cangialosi Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Matthew G Wiranto; W Petrie Engelbrecht; Heleen E Tutein Nolthenius; W Joerd van der Meer; Yijin Ren Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Jamille B Ferreira; Ilana O Christovam; David S Alencar; Andréa F J da Motta; Claudia T Mattos; Adriana Cury-Saramago Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 2.419