Literature DB >> 26536440

Influence of the Preoperative Neurological Status on Survival After the Surgical Treatment of Symptomatic Spinal Metastases With Spinal Cord Compression.

Petr Vanek1, Ondrej Bradac, Ferdinand Trebicky, Karel Saur, Patricia de Lacy, Vladimir Benes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Consecutive case-series.
OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between the preoperative neurological status and subsequent survival of patients undergoing surgical treatment for symptomatic spinal metastases. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The survival of cancer patients has increased over recent years with improvements in oncologic therapy. As many as 70% of cancer patients develop spinal metastases and ∼10% of all cancer patients are treated for metastatic spinal cord compression.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 166 patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases in our department between 2005 and 2012. The evaluated factors were age, primary tumor aggressiveness (slow, moderate, rapid growing), spinal location (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral), operation type (posterior decompression, anterior or posterior instrumented procedure, and radical combined instrumented surgery), preoperative evaluation using the revised Tokuhashi scoring system (<9, 9-11, and 12-15), pre- and postoperative neurological status according to the Frankel score (A-C and D-E), and the site of the main spinal cord compression (anterior, posterior, or combined). Postoperative complication and recurrence rate were also monitored.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 62 ± 12 years. The median survival time after surgery was 16.0 months. Preoperative neurological status influenced survival time significantly; the median survival was 5.1 months in Frankel A-C and 28.2 months in Frankel D-E (P < 0.001). Improvement on the Frankel scale did not influence the survival time (P = 0.131). When the patients' age was <65 years this related to a significantly longer survival time (P = 0.046). The Tokuhashi score predicted patient's survival independently (P < 0.001). The other factors had no statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: The most important factors influencing postoperative survival time of these patients with symptomatic spinal metastases was the preoperative neurological condition and the Tokuhashi scoring system, which together represents a useful tool for planning the extent of surgical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26536440     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive versus conventional spine surgery for vertebral metastases: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Zach Pennington; A Karim Ahmed; Camilo A Molina; Jeffrey Ehresman; Ilya Laufer; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

Review 2.  Surgical complications of extraspinal tumors in the cervical spine: a report of 110 cases and literature review.

Authors:  WenHua Yang; Liang Jiang; XiaoGuang Liu; Feng Wei; Miao Yu; FengLiang Wu; Lei Dang; Hua Zhou; Hua Zhang; ZhongJun Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Intraoperative and late complications after spinal tumour resection and dorsoventral reconstruction].

Authors:  A Thomas; T Hollstein; S Zwingenberger; K-D Schaser; A C Disch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases: a prospective study.

Authors:  C Bouthors; S Prost; C Court; B Blondel; Y P Charles; S Fuentes; H P Mousselard; C Mazel; C H Flouzat-Lachaniette; P Bonnevialle; F Saihlan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  A systematic review of MIS and open decompression surgery for spinal metastases in the last two decades.

Authors:  Bhoresh Dhamija; Dheeraj Batheja; Birender Singh Balain
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-25

6.  Surgical treatment of the lower cervical brucellosis with osteoporosis in the northwest region of China: review of 22 cases.

Authors:  Hou-Kun Li; Jin-Peng Du; Da-Geng Huang; Le-Qun Shan; Bao-Rong He; Liang Yan; Qing-Peng Zhao; Ding-Jun Hao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Surgical intervention for vertebral metastases may benefit lung cancer patients no less than other patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Takashi Kobayashi; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Toshiki Abe; Eiji Abe; Kazuma Kikuchi; Yoichi Shimada; Seiko Matsumoto; Shin Fukui
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-01-04

8.  Comprehensive surgical treatment strategy for spinal metastases.

Authors:  Arthur Wagner; Elena Haag; Ann-Kathrin Joerger; Philipp Jost; Stephanie E Combs; Maria Wostrack; Jens Gempt; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Different roles of matrix metalloproteinase 2 in osteolysis of skeletal dysplasia and bone metastasis (Review).

Authors:  Xiumao Li; Libin Jin; Yanbin Tan
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.952

10.  Patient Characteristics Following Surgery for Spinal Metastases: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Li Yang; Feng Wang; Hao Zhang; Xiong-Gang Yang; Hao-Ran Zhang; Ji-Kai Li; Rui-Qi Qiao; Guo-Chuan Zhang; Yong-Cheng Hu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.