Literature DB >> 31396747

Outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases: a prospective study.

C Bouthors1, S Prost2, C Court3, B Blondel2, Y P Charles4, S Fuentes5, H P Mousselard6, C Mazel7, C H Flouzat-Lachaniette8, P Bonnevialle9, F Saihlan10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Owing to recent advances in cancer therapy, updated data are required for clinicians counselling patients on treatment of spinal metastases.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the outcomes of surgical treatments of spinal metastases.
METHODS: Prospective and multicentric study that included consecutively patients operated on for spinal metastases between January 2016 and January 2017. Overall survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate hazard ratio (HR) analysing mortality risk according to preoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS), mobility level and neurological status.
RESULTS: A total of 252 patients were included (145 males, 107 females) aged a mean 63.3 years. Median survival was 450 days. Primary cancer sites were lung (21%) and breast (19%). Multiple spinal metastases involved 122 patients (48%). Concomitant skeletal and visceral metastases were noted in 90 patients (36%). Main procedure was laminectomy and posterior fixation (57%). Overall, pain and mobility level were improved postoperatively. Most patients had normal preoperative motor function (50%) and remained so postoperatively. Patients "bedbound" on admission were the less likely to recover. In-hospital death rate was 2.4% (three disease progression, one septic shock, one pneumonia, one pulmonary embolism). Complication rate was 33%, deep wound infection was the most frequent aetiology. Higher mortality was observed in patients with poorest preoperative KPS (KPS 0-40%, HR = 3.1, p < 0.001) and mobility level ("bedbound", HR = 2.16, p < 0.001). Survival seemed also to be linked to preoperative neurological function.
CONCLUSION: Surgical treatments helped maintain reasonable condition for patients with spinal metastases. Intervention should be offered before patients' condition worsen to ensure better outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Spinal metastases; Surgical treatment; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31396747     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05015-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  42 in total

1.  Diagnosis and management of patients at risk of or with metastatic spinal cord compression: summary of NICE guidance.

Authors:  B D White; A J Stirling; E Paterson; K Asquith-Coe; A Melder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-11-27

2.  Reassessment of scoring systems and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Emeline Tabouret; Cécile Cauvin; Stéphane Fuentes; Benjamin Esterni; Tarek Adetchessi; Naji Salem; Anne Madroszyk; Anthony Gonçalves; François Casalonga; Gwenaelle Gravis
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Survival analysis in patients with metastatic spinal disease: the influence of surgery, histology, clinical and neurologic status.

Authors:  Matheus Fernandes de Oliveira; Jose Marcus Rotta; Ricardo Vieira Botelho
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 1.420

4.  Is Ambulatory Status a Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients with Spinal Metastases? An Exploratory Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiong-Gang Yang; Yue Han; Feng Wang; Yong-Heng Liu; Yong-Cheng Hu; Deng-Xing Lun; Jiang-Tao Feng; Kun-Chi Hua; Li Yang; Hao Zhang; Ming-You Xu; Hao-Ran Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Surgery improves pain, function and quality of life in patients with spinal metastases: a prospective study on 118 patients.

Authors:  Gerald M Y Quan; Jean-Marc Vital; Nicholas Aurouer; Ibrahim Obeid; Jean Palussière; Abou Diallo; Vincent Pointillart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Predictors of survival after surgical treatment of spinal metastasis.

Authors:  Robert T Arrigo; Paul Kalanithi; Ivan Cheng; Todd Alamin; Eugene J Carragee; Stefan A Mindea; Jongsoo Park; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Actual and predicted survival time of patients with spinal metastases of lung cancer: evaluation of the robustness of the Tokuhashi score.

Authors:  Christian Hessler; Eik Vettorazzi; Juergen Madert; Carsten Bokemeyer; Jens Panse
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Predictive value of seven preoperative prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases.

Authors:  Andreas Leithner; Roman Radl; Gerald Gruber; Markus Hochegger; Katharina Leithner; Heike Welkerling; Peter Rehak; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Prognostic effect of factors involved in revised Tokuhashi score system for patients with spinal metastases: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiong-Gang Yang; Deng-Xing Lun; Yong-Cheng Hu; Yong-Heng Liu; Feng Wang; Jiang-Tao Feng; Kun-Chi Hua; Li Yang; Hao Zhang; Ming-You Xu; Hao-Ran Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Essential Concepts for the Management of Metastatic Spine Disease: What the Surgeon Should Know and Practice.

Authors:  Ori Barzilai; Stefano Boriani; Charles G Fisher; Arjun Sahgal; Jorrit Jan Verlaan; Ziya L Gokaslan; Aron Lazary; Chetan Bettegowda; Laurence D Rhines; Ilya Laufer
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-05-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  SORG algorithm to predict 3- and 12-month survival in metastatic spinal disease: a cross-sectional population-based retrospective study.

Authors:  Gregory Zegarek; Enrico Tessitore; Etienne Chaboudez; Aria Nouri; Karl Schaller; Renato Gondar
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Impact of Spinal Instrumentation on Neurological Outcome in Patients with Intermediate Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS).

Authors:  Moritz Lenschow; Maximilian Lenz; Niklas von Spreckelsen; Julian Ossmann; Johanna Meyer; Julia Keßling; Lukas Nadjiri; Sergej Telentschak; Kourosh Zarghooni; Peter Knöll; Moritz Perrech; Eren Celik; Max Scheyerer; Volker Neuschmelting
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.575

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.