| Literature DB >> 26535237 |
Christian N Anderson1, Robert A Magnussen2, John J Block3, Allen F Anderson1, Kurt P Spindler4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) can progress to loose body formation, with or without subchondral bone attachment to the lesion. The efficacy of internal fixation of chondral loose bodies has not been determined. HYPOTHESIS: Operative fixation of cartilaginous loose bodies would result in (1) healed OCD at second-look arthroscopy, (2) restored cartilage appearance on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (3) nearly normal knee function, as determined by patient-reported outcome scores. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: OCD; chondral loose body; functional outcome; knee; operative fixation; osteochondritis dissecans
Year: 2013 PMID: 26535237 PMCID: PMC4555482 DOI: 10.1177/2325967113496546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.Patient 4. (A) Preoperative anteroposterior (AP) radiograph showing the osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion of the medial femoral condyle (black arrows). (B) Medial femoral condyle after arthrotomy, bone grafting of the OCD defect, and fixation of the cartilage fragment using 1.5 × 16–mm mini-fragment screws. (C) AP radiograph 1 week after surgery, demonstrating the position of the mini-fragment screws used for fixation of the cartilage fragment. (D) Arthroscopic image 3 months after operative fixation, demonstrating outlining of the cartilage fragment (small blue arrows) with a smooth, stable surface. A residual small defect is seen (large blue arrow) where the mini-fragment screw was removed. (E) A 3-T sagittal proton-density-weighted MRI 1 year after bone grafting and fixation of the cartilage fragment. The cartilage fragment healed, and complete filling of the defect was noted (white double arrow); however, incomplete split-like integration into the border zone can be seen (long white arrow). (F) A 3-T sagittal 3-dimensional spoiled gradient echo MRI 1 year after surgery, showing the fixed fragment with a smooth articular surface (white arrowheads) and a similar appearance to normal cartilage (dashed arrow).
Figure 2.Patient 5. (A) Preoperative anteroposterior (AP) radiographs demonstrating the osteochondritis dissecans lesion of the medial femoral condyle (black arrows). (B) Coronal proton-density-weighted MRI with fat suppression demonstrates the fragment in situ with fluid signal extending to its undersurface (white arrow). The fragment has a similar signal intensity to normal articular cartilage. At the time of surgery, the fragment was found to be completely disconnected from the underlying crater. (C) AP radiograph 1 week after surgery, showing the mini-fragment screws capturing the articular fragment. The radiograph has been graphically enhanced to show the outline of the radiolucent articular fragment (dashed green line) and demonstrate countersinking of the screws beneath the articular surface (solid white line). (D) AP radiograph 9 months postoperatively. At the time of surgery, the cartilage fragment was found to be thicker than normal articular cartilage. Consequently, bone grafting required to reestablish articular congruity did not reestablish the normal subchondral contour, giving the appearance of a persistent defect. The knee had normal joint spaces and no degenerative changes in the medial compartment. Residual screw tips broken off during removal of hardware were buried within the femoral condyle and caused no sequelae. (E) Coronal proton-density-weighted MRI with fat suppression 9 months after surgery, demonstrating the healed cartilage fragment that has completely filled the defect, has a smooth surface, and is congruent with the remaining portion of the medial femoral condyle (white arrowheads). Metal artifact is visible from the residual hardware (white arrows).
Patient Demographics and Baseline Characteristics
| Patient | Age, y | Sex | Skeletal Maturity | Duration of Symptoms, mo | Onset of Symptoms | Previous Surgery | Location of Lesion | Lesion Size, cm2 | Grade | Treatment Method | Number of Screws | Bone Graft |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | M | Mature | 36 | Gradual | Plica debridement (2.5 years earlier) | Lateral Trochlea | 1.5 | 5 | ARIF | 2 | No |
| 2 | 13 | M | Immature | 0.5 | Acute | Lateral Trochlea | 3.0 | 5 | ORIF | 2 | LFC | |
| 3 | 18 | M | Mature | 12 | Gradual | MFC | 1.5 | 5 | ORIF | 2 | Proximal tibia | |
| 4 | 17 | F | Mature | 36 | Acute | Drilling of OCD (1 year earlier) | MFC | 2.8 | 5 | ORIF | 3 | Proximal tibia |
| 5 | 25 | M | Mature | 48 | Gradual | MFC | 3.8 | 5 | ORIF | 3 | Proximal tibia | |
| Mean | 19 | 26.5 | 2.5 |
ARIF, arthroscopic reduction internal fixation; LFC, lateral femoral condyle; MFC, medial femoral condyle; ORIF, open reduction internal fixation.
Age at the time of operative fixation of the loose body.
Maturity defined as closure of the distal femoral physis.
Grade 5 lesion = chondral loose bodies without attached bone as an extension of the classification system proposed by Guhl.[16]
MOCART Grading
| Patient | Time to Postop MRI, y | Filling of Defect | Integration Into Border Zone | Surface of Repair Tissue | Structure of Repair Tissue | Signal Intensity of Repair Tissue | Subchondral Lamina | Subchondral Bone | Adhesions | Synovitis | MOCART Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2 | 7.5 | Incomplete, <50% | Incomplete, split-like | Intact | Homogenous | Isointense | Intact | Edema, granulation tissue, sclerosis, mild hypertrophy | No | No | 75 |
| 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 4 | 1 | Complete | Incomplete, split-like | Intact | Inhomogenous | Moderate hyperintensity | Not intact | Granulation, microcyst | No | No | 60 |
| 5 | 0.8 | Hypertrophy | Incomplete, split-like | Intact | Homogenous | Isointense | Not Intact | Edema, granulation tissue | No | No | 80 |
| Mean | 3.1 | 72 |
MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue)28 classification system; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; Postop, postoperative.28
MOCART score range = 0-100.[42]
Intermediate-Term Follow-up KOOS Subscales
| Patient | Time to Follow-up, y | Additional Surgery | Marx Activity Score | Pain | Knee Symptoms | Function in Daily Living | Function in Sport and Recreation | Knee-Related Quality of Life |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.8 | No | 16 | 94 | 86 | 94 | 70 | 81 |
| 2 | 4.5 | No | 16 | 94 | 79 | 97 | 60 | 56 |
| 3 | 4.4 | No | 11 | 78 | 75 | 76 | 55 | 56 |
| 4 | 1.8 | Debridement, drilling | 11 | 97 | 93 | 100 | 95 | 75 |
| 5 | None | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Mean ± SD | 4.6 ± 2.5 | 13.5 ± 2.9 | 91.0 ± 8.9 | 83.0 ± 7.9 | 91.9 ± 10.6 | 70.0 ± 17.8 | 67.2 ±12.9 | |
| Controls | 92.2 ± 11.2 | 87.2 ± 13.9 | 94.2 ± 10.0 | 85.1 ± 20.8 | 85.3 ± 19.2 |
Range 0-100; higher scores indicate less pain and other symptoms and better function. KOOS, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; SD, standard deviation.
Range, 0-16; higher scores indicated higher levels of activity.
Mean ± SD scores of age-matched controls.[34]