Literature DB >> 20104156

A prospective, randomized clinical study of osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans in the knee joint in children.

Rimtautas Gudas1, Rasa Simonaityte, Emilis Cekanauskas, Ramūnas Tamosiūnas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the arthroscopic mosaic-type osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT) and microfracture (MF) procedures for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) defects of the femoral condyles of the knee joint in children under the age of 18 years. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective, randomized clinical study.
METHODS: Between 2001 and 2005, a total of 50 children with a mean age of 14.3 years (12 to 18) and with symptomatic lesions of the OCD in the femoral condyle of the knee were randomized to undergo either the OAT or the MF procedure. Only those children with grade 3 or 4 (OCD) in the medial or lateral femoral condyle (according to International Cartilage Repair Society, ICRS) were included in the study. Forty-seven patients (94%) were available for follow-up. There were 25 patients in the OAT group and 22 patients in the MF group. The mean duration of symptoms was 23.54+/-4.24 months and the mean follow-up was 4.2 years (range from 3 to 6 y), and none of the children had prior surgical interventions to the affected knee. Children were evaluated using ICRS score, x-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, and second-look arthroscopies.
RESULTS: After 1 year, both groups had significant clinical improvement (P<0.05) and the ICRS functional and objective assessment showed that 23 of 25 (92%) patients had excellent or good results after OAT compared with 19 of 22 (86%) after MF (NS), but 19 of 23 (83%) after OAT and only 12 of 19 (63%) after MF procedure maintained excellent or good results after 4.2 years (range from 3 to 6 y). The MF group showed significant deterioration over the 4.2 years follow-up (P<0.05), but still had significant clinical improvement compared with pretreatment evaluation (P=0.004). There were 9 of 22 (41%) failures in the MF group, and none in the OAT group. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation according to the ICRS evaluation system showed excellent or good repairs in 19 of 21 patients (91%) after OAT compared with 10 of 18 (56%) after MF.
CONCLUSIONS: At an average of 4.2 years follow-up, our prospective, randomized, clinical study in children under the age of 18 years has shown significant superiority of the mosaic-type OAT over MF for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans defects in the knee. However, our study has shown that both MF and OAT give encouraging clinical results for children under the age of 18 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1: randomized controlled trial, significant difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20104156     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b8f6c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  54 in total

Review 1.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation for full thickness articular cartilage defects of the knee.

Authors:  Haris S Vasiliadis; Jason Wasiak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

Review 2.  Osteochondritis Dissecans: Etiology, Pathology, and Imaging with a Special Focus on the Knee Joint.

Authors:  Juergen Bruns; Mathias Werner; Christian Habermann
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Rehabilitation following osteochondral injury to the knee.

Authors:  Timothy F Tyler; Jennifer Y Lung
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-01-28

4.  Management of loose osteochondritis dissecans in an adolescent.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Ankur Kansagra; Vipul Vijay; Abhishek Vaish; Amit Kumar Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-11-14

5.  Current treatments of isolated articular cartilage lesions of the knee achieve similar outcomes.

Authors:  Hong-Chul Lim; Ji-Hoon Bae; Sang-Heon Song; Young-Eun Park; Seung-Ju Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  A review of knowledge in osteochondritis dissecans: 123 years of minimal evolution from König to the ROCK study group.

Authors:  Eric W Edmonds; John Polousky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Comparative efficacy of cartilage repair procedures in the knee: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan C Riboh; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Brian J Cole; Adam B Yanke
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Treatment of juvenile osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: current concepts review.

Authors:  Francesca Vannini; Marco Cavallo; Matteo Baldassarri; Francesco Castagnini; Alessandra Olivieri; Enrico Ferranti; Roberto Buda; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-02-13

9.  Osteochondral autografts.

Authors:  Shantanu Patil; Sachin R Tapasvi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

10.  Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: Short-Term Outcomes of a Hybrid Technique to Restore a Partially Salvageable Progeny Fragment.

Authors:  Heath P Melugin; Vishal S Desai; Bruce A Levy; Yoshinari Tanaka; Shuji Horibe; Norimasa Nakamura; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.