Arnd Steinbrück1, Andreas Fottner2, Christian Schröder2, Matthias Woiczinski2, Markus Schmitt-Sody2, Tatjana Müller2, Peter E Müller2, Volkmar Jansson2. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. arnd.steinbrueck@med.uni-muenchen.de. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Anterior knee pain is a major reason for unsatisfied patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Since malposition and increased retropatellar peak pressure are supposed to contribute to pain, we conducted this in vitro study to analyse the influence of mediolateral tibial component position on tibiofemoral and patella kinematics as well as retropatellar pressure. METHODS: Eight fresh frozen cadaver specimens were tested after a fixed-bearing TKA. To evaluate the influence of mediolateral tibial component position, special inlays with 3 mm of medialization and lateralization were constructed. For the analysis, a weight-bearing knee rig under a loaded squat from 20° to 120° of flexion was used. Tibiofemoral and patella kinematics were measured with an ultrasonic-based three-dimensional motion analysis system. Additionally, retropatellar pressure distribution was registered with a pressure-sensitive film. RESULTS: Alteration of mediolateral tibial component position by 3 mm did not reveal a significant influence on retropatellar peak pressure (7.5 ± 2.5 vs. 7.2 ± 2.6 MPa). Regarding tibiofemoral kinematics, 3-mm medialization of the tibial baseplate significantly increased lateral femoral rollback and femorotibial external rotation. Medialization of 3 mm also significantly increased the relative medial patella shift and decreased lateral patella tilt. DISCUSSION: Medialization of the tibial baseplate came along with more lateral rollback and external femorotibial rotation. For the positioning of the tibial baseplate, rotational alignment seems to be more important than mediolateral orientation. Since retropatellar peak pressure remained rather unchanged, the tibial baseplate should be placed by the surgeon looking for a maximal tibial coverage without overhang.
PURPOSE: Anterior knee pain is a major reason for unsatisfied patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Since malposition and increased retropatellar peak pressure are supposed to contribute to pain, we conducted this in vitro study to analyse the influence of mediolateral tibial component position on tibiofemoral and patella kinematics as well as retropatellar pressure. METHODS: Eight fresh frozen cadaver specimens were tested after a fixed-bearing TKA. To evaluate the influence of mediolateral tibial component position, special inlays with 3 mm of medialization and lateralization were constructed. For the analysis, a weight-bearing knee rig under a loaded squat from 20° to 120° of flexion was used. Tibiofemoral and patella kinematics were measured with an ultrasonic-based three-dimensional motion analysis system. Additionally, retropatellar pressure distribution was registered with a pressure-sensitive film. RESULTS: Alteration of mediolateral tibial component position by 3 mm did not reveal a significant influence on retropatellar peak pressure (7.5 ± 2.5 vs. 7.2 ± 2.6 MPa). Regarding tibiofemoral kinematics, 3-mm medialization of the tibial baseplate significantly increased lateral femoral rollback and femorotibial external rotation. Medialization of 3 mm also significantly increased the relative medial patella shift and decreased lateral patella tilt. DISCUSSION: Medialization of the tibial baseplate came along with more lateral rollback and external femorotibial rotation. For the positioning of the tibial baseplate, rotational alignment seems to be more important than mediolateral orientation. Since retropatellar peak pressure remained rather unchanged, the tibial baseplate should be placed by the surgeon looking for a maximal tibial coverage without overhang.
Authors: Joanna M Stephen; Punyawan Lumpaopong; Alexander L Dodds; Andy Williams; Andrew A Amis Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Maximilian J Hartel; Yannick Loosli; Daniel Delfosse; Peter Diel; Michael Thali; Steffen Ross; Sandro Kohl; Stefan Eggli Journal: Knee Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Robin W T M van Kempen; Janneke J P Schimmel; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Hilde Vandenneucker; Ate B Wymenga Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-03-30 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Arnd Steinbrück; Matthias Woiczinski; Patrick Weber; Peter Ernst Müller; Volkmar Jansson; Christian Schröder Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 2.819
Authors: In Jun Koh; Il Jung Park; Charles C Lin; Nilay A Patel; Christen E Chalmers; Mauro Maniglio; Michelle H McGarry; Thay Q Lee Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-10-28 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Maeruan Kebbach; Martin Darowski; Sven Krueger; Christoph Schilling; Thomas M Grupp; Rainer Bader; Andreas Geier Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 3.623
Authors: Patrick Weber; Matthias Woiczinski; Arnd Steinbrück; Florian Schmidutz; Thomas Niethammer; Christian Schröder; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Adrian Sauer; Christoph Thorwaechter; Ingrid Dupraz; Allan Maas; Arnd Steinbrueck; Thomas M Grupp; Matthias Woiczinski Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Sanar S Yokhana; D Alex Hamilton; Sasha A Stine; Lauren N Stimson; Abdul K Zalikha; Chaoyang Chen; Hussein F Darwiche Journal: J Orthop Date: 2021-02-09