Literature DB >> 26530844

The effect of increased experience on complications in robotic hysterectomy for malignant and benign gynecological disease.

Celine Lönnerfors1,2, Petur Reynisson3,4, Barbara Geppert3,4, Jan Persson3,4.   

Abstract

The study objective was to assess the effect of increased experience on complications in robotic hysterectomy for malignant and benign gynecological disease. This is a retrospective cohort study. It is a Canadian Task Force classification II-2 study conducted at the University Hospital, Sweden. The patients were 949 women planned for robotic hysterectomy for malignant (75 %) and benign (25 %) gynecological disease between October 2005 and December 2013. They were continuously evaluated for the rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications up to 1-year post-surgery, the latter according to Clavien-Dindo classification following the introduction of robotic surgery with special awareness of complications possibly related to robot-specific risk factors, the description of refinement of practice and assessment of the effect of these measures. The rate of intraoperative complications, the overall rate of complications and the rate of ≥grade 3 complications decreased from the first to the last time period (4.8 vs 2.6 %, p = 0.037, 34 vs 19 %, p = 0.003 and 13.5 vs 3.2 %, p = 0.0003, respectively). The rate of intraoperative complications and the rate of postoperative complications possibly related to robot-specific risk factors was reduced from the first to the last time period (3.8 vs 0.6 %, p = 0.028 and 7.7 vs 1.5 %, p = 0.003, respectively). In patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy for malignant and benign gynecological disease intraoperative and postoperative complications and complications possibly related to the robotic approach diminish with training, experience and refinement of practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Intraoperative complications; Postoperative complications; Robotic

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26530844     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-015-0534-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  27 in total

1.  Adverse events associated with laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jason C Barnett; Laura J Havrilesky; Amy E Bondurant; Nicole D Fleming; Paula S Lee; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Andrew Berchuck; Fidel A Valea
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Transverse versus vertical camera port incision in robotic radical prostatectomy: effect on incisional hernias and cosmesis.

Authors:  Shawn Beck; Douglas Skarecky; Kathy Osann; Reina Juarez; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Khadra Galaal; Andrew Bryant; Ann D Fisher; Maha Al-Khaduri; Fiona Kew; Alberto D Lopes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

4.  Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; William M Burke; Elizabeth T Wilde; Sharyn N Lewin; Abigail S Charles; Jin Hee Kim; Noah Goldman; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  Celine Lönnerfors; Petur Reynisson; Jan Persson
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Implementation and applications of robotic surgery within gynecologic oncology and gynecology; analysis of the first thousand cases.

Authors:  C Lönnerfors; J Persson
Journal:  Ceska Gynekol       Date:  2013-01

8.  A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Patrick Lowe; Donald H Chamberlain; Scott A Kamelle; Peter R Johnson; Todd D Tillmanns
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Robot assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data.

Authors:  Jan Persson; Petur Reynisson; Christer Borgfeldt; Paivi Kannisto; Bengt Lindahl; Thomas Bossmar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches.

Authors:  Vanessa L Jacoby; Amy Autry; Gavin Jacobson; Robert Domush; Sanae Nakagawa; Alison Jacoby
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  1 in total

1.  Uptake and outcomes of robotic gynaecological surgery in England (2006-2018): an account of Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES).

Authors:  D El-Hamamsy; R S Geary; I Gurol-Urganci; J van der Meulen; D Tincello
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-02-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.