Literature DB >> 21741689

Transverse versus vertical camera port incision in robotic radical prostatectomy: effect on incisional hernias and cosmesis.

Shawn Beck1, Douglas Skarecky, Kathy Osann, Reina Juarez, Thomas E Ahlering.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the incidence of incisional hernias (IHs) and propose a simple modification to reduce the incidence of IHs. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) historically uses a vertical midline camera port incision to extract the prostate.
METHODS: Of 900 consecutive RARPs, the initial 735 had a vertical and subsequent 165 transverse incisions. Two methods were used to identify IHs: clinic visits noted in the prospective database and screening using electronic mail. We compared the baseline factors between the vertical IH and IH-free cohorts. The maximal scar width was recorded in 178 consecutive men presenting to our clinic: vertical (n=107) and transverse (n=71).
RESULTS: IHs occurred significantly more often after a vertical incision (5.3% vs 0.6%, P=.005). The IH rates after a vertical incision could be estimated to be as great as 16.7% (18 of 108) using the electronic mail respondents or as low as 3.3% (21 of 627) according to clinic follow-up. On univariate analysis, baseline age, International Index of Erectile Function 5-item questionnaire, prostate weight, bother score (all P≤.05), and body mass index (P=.058) were associated with an increased risk of an IH. After adjusting for baseline factors on multivariate logistic regression analysis, the relative odds of developing an IH with a vertical versus transverse incision was 11 (95% confidence interval 1.5-82). The average maximal scar width was reduced from 5.5 to 2.0 mm (P<.0001).
CONCLUSION: In the present sample population, the vertical IH rate was estimated to be potentially as low as 3.3% or as great as 16.7%. On multivariate analysis, a greater body mass index and larger prostate size significantly increased the risk of hernia development. Transverse incisions dramatically reduced the rate of IHs and the maximal scar width. The IH rates varied significantly by reporting method.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21741689      PMCID: PMC4230820          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  12 in total

1.  Pfannenstiel versus vertical laparotomy in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy with spinal anesthesia: results of a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Andrea Salonia; Nazareno Suardi; Antonella Crescenti; Giuseppe Zanni; Gemma Viola Fantini; Andrea Gallina; Massimo Ghezzi; Renzo Colombo; Francesco Montorsi; Patrizio Rigatti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  N C Hodgson; R A Malthaner; T Ostbye
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Alok Shrivastava; Sanjeev Kaul; Ketan K Badani; Michael Fumo; Mahendra Bhandari; James O Peabody
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Randomized comparison of polyglycolic acid and polyglyconate sutures for abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in patients with suspected impaired wound healing.

Authors:  P J Osther; P Gjøde; B B Mortensen; P B Mortensen; J Bartholin; F Gottrup
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes.

Authors:  M Mudge; L E Hughes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Kenneth J Palmer; Geoff Coughlin; Srinivas Samavedi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  [Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years].

Authors:  J Höer; G Lawong; U Klinge; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Incisional hernia after midline laparotomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  L A Israelsson; T Jonsson
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1996-02

Review 10.  Transverse verses midline incisions for abdominal surgery.

Authors:  S R Brown; P B Goodfellow
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19
View more
  8 in total

1.  Preventing perioperative complications of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Douglas Skarecky; Blanca Morales; Kathryn Osann; Louis Eichel; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Risk of incisional hernia after minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Behfar Ehdaie; Coral L Atoria; Elena B Elkin; James A Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The effect of increased experience on complications in robotic hysterectomy for malignant and benign gynecological disease.

Authors:  Celine Lönnerfors; Petur Reynisson; Barbara Geppert; Jan Persson
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-10-13

4.  Feasibility study of a clinically-integrated randomized trial of modifications to radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Caroline Bennette; Karim Touijer; Jonathan Coleman; Vincent Laudone; Brett Carver; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Predictors of incisional hernia after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Avinash Chennamsetty; Jason Hafron; Luke Edwards; Scott Pew; Behdod Poushanchi; Jay Hollander; Kim A Killinger; Mary P Coffey; Kenneth M Peters
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2015-02-02

6.  Enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal repair in a patient with incisional hernia after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a case report.

Authors:  Shusaku Honma; Keisuke Tanino; Takashi Kumode; Ryosuke Mizuno; Yugo Matsui; Siyuan Yao; Teppei Murakami; Takatsugu Kan; Sanae Nakajima; Takehisa Harada
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-07

7.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after the first decade: surgical evolution or new paradigm.

Authors:  Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2013-04-03

Review 8.  Advances in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy over Time.

Authors:  Emma F P Jacobs; Ronald Boris; Timothy A Masterson
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2013-11-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.