Literature DB >> 26530659

The influence of catastrophising on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

H J Kim1, J W Park1, B S Chang2, C K Lee2, J S Yeom1.   

Abstract

Pain catastrophising is an adverse coping mechanism, involving an exaggerated response to anticipated or actual pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of pain 'catastrophising', as measured using the pain catastrophising scale (PCS), on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). A total of 138 patients (47 men and 91 women, mean age 65.9; 45 to 78) were assigned to low (PCS score < 25, n = 68) and high (PCS score ≥ 25, n = 70) PCS groups. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included the ODI and visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, which were recorded at each assessment conducted during the 12-month follow-up period The overall changes in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain over a 12-month period were significantly different between the groups (ODI, p < 0.001; VAS for back pain, p < 0.001; VAS for leg pain, p = 0.040). The ODI and VAS for back and leg pain significantly decreased over time after surgery in both groups (p < 0.001 for all three variables). The patterns of change in the ODI and VAS for back pain during the follow-up period significantly differed between the two groups, suggesting that the PCS group is a potential treatment moderator. However, there was no difference in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain between the low and high PCS groups 12 months after surgery. In terms of minimum clinically important differences in ODI scores (12.8), 22 patients (40.7%) had an unsatisfactory surgical outcome in the low PCS group and 16 (32.6%) in the high PCS group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.539). Pre-operative catastrophising did not always result in a poor outcome 12 months after surgery, which indicates that this could moderate the efficacy of surgery for LSS. ©2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  catastrophising; lumbar spinal stenosis; pain catastrophising scale; surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26530659     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.36016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  4 in total

1.  The prevalence and impact of frailty in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Saejong Park; Soo-Hyun Park; Jeong Hyun Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin S Yeom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pain Catastrophizing and Kinesiophobia Affect Return to Sport in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Robert B Browning; Ian M Clapp; Thomas D Alter; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-27

Review 3.  Can pain catastrophizing be changed in surgical patients? A scoping review

Authors:  Eric Gibson; Marlis T. Sabo
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Psychological Predictors of Satisfaction after Lumbar Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Yoshio Yamamoto; Mamoru Kawakami; Masakazu Minetama; Masafumi Nakagawa; Masatoshi Teraguchi; Ryohei Kagotani; Yoshimasa Mera; Tadashi Sumiya; Sachika Matsuo; Tomoko Kitano; Yukihiro Nakagawa
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-05-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.