Literature DB >> 26529325

Characteristics of Patients Who Report Confusion After Reading Their Primary Care Clinic Notes Online.

Joseph Root1, Natalia V Oster1, Sara L Jackson1, Roanne Mejilla2, Jan Walker3, Joann G Elmore1.   

Abstract

Patient access to online electronic medical records (EMRs) is increasing and may offer benefits to patients. However, the inherent complexity of medicine may cause confusion. We elucidate characteristics and health behaviors of patients who report confusion after reading their doctors' notes online. We analyzed data from 4,528 patients in Boston, MA, central Pennsylvania, and Seattle, WA, who were granted online access to their primary care doctors' clinic notes and who viewed at least one note during the 1-year intervention. Three percent of patients reported confusion after reading their visit notes. These patients were more likely to be at least 70 years of age (p < .0001), have fewer years of education (p < .0017), be unemployed (p < .0001), have lower levels of self-reported health (p < .0043), and worry more after reading visit notes (relative risk [RR] 4.83; confidence interval [CI] 3.17, 7.36) compared to patients who were not confused. In adjusted analyses, they were less likely to report feeling more in control of their health (RR 0.42; CI 0.25, 0.71), remembering their care plan (RR 0.26; CI 0.17, 0.42), and understanding their medical conditions (RR 0.32; CI 0.19, 0.54) as a result of reading their doctors' notes compared to patients who were not confused. Patients who were confused by reading their doctors' notes were less likely to report benefits in health behaviors. Understanding this small subset of patients is a critical step in reducing gaps in provider-patient communication and in efforts to tailor educational approaches for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26529325      PMCID: PMC7043205          DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2014.990078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  17 in total

1.  Open notes: doctors and patients signing on.

Authors:  Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker; Jonathan D Darer; Joann G Elmore; Henry J Feldman; Suzanne G Leveille; James D Ralston; Stephen E Ross; Elisabeth Vodicka; Valerie D Weber
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  The case against showing patients their records.

Authors:  A P Ross
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-01

3.  The urban underserved: attitudes towards gaining full access to electronic medical records.

Authors:  Shireesha Dhanireddy; Jan Walker; Lisa Reisch; Natalia Oster; Thomas Delbanco; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: patients and doctors look ahead: patient and physician surveys.

Authors:  Jan Walker; Suzanne G Leveille; Long Ngo; Elisabeth Vodicka; Jonathan D Darer; Shireesha Dhanireddy; Joann G Elmore; Henry J Feldman; Marc J Lichtenfeld; Natalia Oster; James D Ralston; Stephen E Ross; Tom Delbanco
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Access to electronic health records in primary care-a survey of patients' views.

Authors:  Cecilia Pyper; Justin Amery; Marion Watson; Claire Crook
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2004-10-26

6.  Patients' interest in reading their medical record: relation with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics and patients' approach to health care.

Authors:  Jinnet B Fowles; Allan C Kind; Cheryl Craft; Elizabeth A Kind; Jeffrey L Mandel; Susan Adlis
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-04-12

7.  Patient access to records: expectations of hospital doctors and experiences of cancer patients.

Authors:  B Fisher; N Britten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Medical records: practicalities and principles of patient possession.

Authors:  M L Gilhooly; S M McGhee
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Evaluating the impact of patients' online access to doctors' visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project.

Authors:  Suzanne G Leveille; Janice Walker; James D Ralston; Stephen E Ross; Joann G Elmore; Tom Delbanco
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Patients who share transparent visit notes with others: characteristics, risks, and benefits.

Authors:  Sara L Jackson; Roanne Mejilla; Jonathan D Darer; Natalia V Oster; James D Ralston; Suzanne G Leveille; Jan Walker; Tom Delbanco; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  6 in total

1.  Dermatopathologists' Experience With and Perceptions of Patient Online Access to Pathologic Test Result Reports.

Authors:  Hannah Shucard; Michael W Piepkorn; Lisa M Reisch; Kathleen F Kerr; Andrea C Radick; Pin-Chieh Wang; Stevan R Knezevich; Raymond L Barnhill; David E Elder; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 10.282

2.  Parent Perspectives on Pediatric Inpatient OpenNotes.

Authors:  Catherine Arnott Smith; Ryan J Coller; Shannon M Dean; Daniel Sklansky; Peter L T Hoonakker; Windy Smith; Anne S Thurber; Brad D Ehlenfeldt; Michelle M Kelly
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

3.  Your Patient Is Now Reading Your Note: Opportunities, Problems, and Prospects.

Authors:  Jared W Klein; Sara L Jackson; Sigall K Bell; Melissa K Anselmo; Jan Walker; Tom Delbanco; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Sharing Annotated Audio Recordings of Clinic Visits With Patients-Development of the Open Recording Automated Logging System (ORALS): Study Protocol.

Authors:  Paul J Barr; Michelle D Dannenberg; Craig H Ganoe; William Haslett; Rebecca Faill; Saeed Hassanpour; Amar Das; Roger Arend; Meredith C Masel; Sheryl Piper; Haley Reicher; James Ryan; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-07-06

5.  Changes in Clinician Attitudes Toward Sharing Visit Notes: Surveys Pre-and Post-Implementation.

Authors:  James D Ralston; Onchee Yu; Robert B Penfold; Gabrielle Gundersen; Arvind Ramaprasan; Ellen M Schartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Recent perspectives of electronic medical record systems.

Authors:  Xiao-Ying Zhang; Peiying Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.