| Literature DB >> 26529092 |
Susana David1, A R A Mateus2, Elsa L Duarte3, José Albuquerque1, Clara Portugal4, Luísa Sancho4, João Lavinha1, Guilherme Gonçalves5.
Abstract
Major contributions from pathogen genome analysis and host genetics have equated the possibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis co-evolution with its human host leading to more stable sympatric host-pathogen relationships. However, the attribution to either sympatric or allopatric categories depends on the resolution or grain of genotypic characterization. We explored the influence on the sympatric host-pathogen relationship of clinical (HIV infection and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis [MDRTB]) and demographic (gender and age) factors in regards to the genotypic grain by using spacer oligonucleotide typing (spoligotyping) for classification of M. tuberculosis strains within the Euro-American lineage. We analyzed a total of 547 tuberculosis (TB) cases, from six year consecutive sampling in a setting with high TB-HIV coinfection (32.0%). Of these, 62.0% were caused by major circulating pathogen genotypes. The sympatric relationship was defined according to spoligotype in comparison to the international spoligotype database SpolDB4. While no significant association with Euro-American lineage was observed with any of the factors analyzed, increasing the resolution with spoligotyping evidenced a significant association of MDRTB with sympatric strains, regardless of the HIV status. Furthermore, distribution curves of the prevalence of sympatric and allopatric TB in relation to patients' age showed an accentuation of the relevance of the age of onset in the allopatric relationship, as reflected in the trimodal distribution. On the contrary, sympatric TB was characterized by the tendency towards a typical (standard) distribution curve. Our results suggest that within the Euro-American lineage a greater degree of genotyping fine-tuning is necessary in modeling the biological processes behind the host-pathogen interplay. Furthermore, prevalence distribution of sympatric TB to age was suggestive of host genetic determinisms driven by more common variants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26529092 PMCID: PMC4631367 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140625
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Tuberculosis patient characteristics according to genotype for the more frequently observed Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain genotypes.
| Strain genotype | Patient characteristics | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spoligotype neighbor joining tree | Male sex (%) | MDR | HIV | Age | ||||||||
| CC | Node | SLV (1) | SLV (2) | Lineage (Spoligotype) | Freqency (%) | All | HIV+ | HIV- | ||||
| All (n = 339) | - | - | - | - | - | 100.0% (339/339) | 72.0% (244/339) | 9.9% (29/294) | 33.3% (113/339) | 40.42 ± 16.84 | 37.03 ± 10.21 | 42.12 ± 19.11 |
| Allopatric (n = 191) | - | - | - | - | - | 56.3% (191/339) | 72.3% (138/191) | 2.4% (4/164) | 27.2% (52/191) | 40.68 ± 17.05 | 37.96 ± 10.23 | 41.70 ± 18.92 |
| Sympatric (n = 148) | - | - | - | - | - | 43.7% (148/339) | 71.6% (106/148) | 19.2% (25/130) | 41.2% (61/148) | 40.09 ± 16.60 | 36.23 ± 10.21 | 42.79 ± 19.51 |
| CC1 | 59.0% (200/339) | 75.0% (150/200) | 11.5% (20/174) | 33.0% (66/200) | 42.00 ± 17.43 | 37.83 ± 10.62 | 44.04 ± 19.66 | |||||
| SIT42 | Euro-American (LAM9) | 18.0% (61/339) | 72.1% (44/61) | 3.8% (2/52) | 32.8% (20/61) | 43.21 ± 16.90 | 38.70 ± 8.34 | 45.41 ± 19.50 | ||||
| SIT150 | Euro-American (LAM9) | 6.0% (20/339) | 85.0% (17/20) | 0.0% (0/18) | 30.0% (6/20) | 40.50 ± 17.22 | 39.83 ± 16.61 | 40.79 ± 18.08 | ||||
| SIT20 | Euro-American (LAM1 66% LAM9 34%) | 24.2% (82/339) | 79.3% (65/82) | 20.8% (15/72) | 36.6% (30/82) | 41.85 ± 18.45 | 38.07 ± 12.03 | 44.04 ± 21.09 | ||||
| SIT17 | Euro-American (LAM2 82% LAM1 11%) | 2.9% (10/339) | 50.0% (5/10) | 0.0% (0/8) | 30.0% (3/10) | 38.80 ± 16.43 | 32.00 ± 3.46 | 41.71 ± 19.18 | ||||
| SIT389 | Euro-American (LAM1 66% LAM9 34%) | 3.8% (13/339) | 69.2% (9/13) | 23.1% (3/13) | 30.8% (4/13) | 39.46 ± 9.20 | 38.50 ± 5.20 | 39.89 ± 10.78 | ||||
| SIT64 | Euro-American (LAM9) | 4.1% (14/339) | 71.4% (10/14) | 0.0% (0/11) | 21.4% (3/14) | 44.29 ± 21.99 | 30.67 ± 4.04 | 48.00 ± 23.55 | ||||
| CC2 | 15.3% (52/339) | 71.2% (37/52) | 4.7% (2/43) | 26.9% (14/52) | 39.48 ± 16.86 | 39.64 ± 11.58 | 39.42 ± 18.57 | |||||
| SIT53 | Euro-American (T1) | 11.5% (39/339) | 71.8% (28/39) | 3.2% (1/31) | 23.1% (9/39) | 39.77 ± 16.80 | 38.22 ± 7.21 | 40.23 ± 18.82 | ||||
| SIT50 | Euro-American (H3 77% T1 23%) | 3.8% (13/339) | 69.2% (9/13) | 8.3% (1/12) | 38.5% (5/13) | 38.62 ± 17.72 | 42.20 ± 17.87 | 36.38 ± 18.47 | ||||
| Singletons | 25.7% (87/339) | 65.5% (57/87) | 9.1% (7/77) | 37.9% (33/87) | 37.37 ± 15.06 | 34.30 ± 8.32 | 39.24 ± 17.80 | |||||
| SIT244 | Euro-American (T2 82% T1 18%) | 8.8% (30/339) | 56.7% (17/30) | 7.1% (2/28) | 63.33% (19/30) | 34.63 ± 9.60 | 33.63 ± 7.95 | 36.36 ± 12.18 | ||||
| SIT1 | East-Asian (Beijing) | 4.4% (15/339) | 53.3% (8/15) | 0.0% (0/12) | 20.0% (3/15) | 35.27 ± 18.51 | 31.33 ± 6.66 | 36.25 ± 20.56 | ||||
| SIT34 | Euro-American (S 78% T1 22%) | 3.5% (12/339) | 75.0% (9/12) | 0.0% (0/11) | 25.0% (3/12) | 44.33 ± 25.45 | 33.00 ± 8.72 | 48.11 ± 28.41 | ||||
| SIT1106 | Euro-American (LAM9 60% T2 40%) | 2.7% (9/339) | 55.6% (5/9) | 83.3% (5/6) | 55.6% (5/9) | 36.56 ± 13.63 | 36.60 ± 10.74 | 36.50 ± 18.48 | ||||
| SIT47 | Euro-American (Haarlem1) | 6.2% (21/339) | 85.7% (18/21) | 0.0% (0/20) | 14.3% (3/21) | 39.14 ± 11.13 | 39.00 ± 11.00 | 39.17 ± 11.47 | ||||
1 The Allopatric and Sympatric classification of M. tuberculosis strains was obtained from comparison of Portuguese spoligotypes with the fourth international spoligotyping database SpolDB4 [23]. This database classifies strains according to their ‘‘Shared international type” (SIT). Allopatric strains include strains with SITs 42, 150, 17, 53, 50, 1, 34, 47 (n = 191) and Sympatric strains include those strains with SITs 20, 64, 389, 244, 1106 (n = 148).
2 The MIRU-VNTR plus web application (http://www.miru-vntrplus.org) was used to analyse spoligotype data of the M. tuberculosis isolates [39–40]. For minimum spanning tree analysis the Kruskal’s algorithm and force-directed graph layout for visualization according to the SIT using one single locus variation from the Node, SLV(1) was used to generate groupings into clonal clusters (CC).
3 M. tuberculosis lineages were classified using spoligotype data. Spoligotype designation was obtained from the SpolDB4 database (http://www.pasteur-guadeloupe.fr:8081/SITVITdemo) [14–15] and using the Spotclust program (http://www.rpi.edu/$bennek/EpiResearch) [38]. Lineage designation, East-Asian and Euro-American, was on Long Sequence Polymorphism (LSP) analysis [7,9].
4 Drug susceptibility data was available for 86.7% (294/339) of the cases and was used to determine the percentage of multidrugresistant tuberculosis (MDRTB) cases to strain genotype.
5 HIV = human immunodeficiency virus infection
6 Age in years was expressed as the mean ± sd, sd = standard deviation.
Fig 1Phylogenetic analysis using the MIRU-VNTR-plus software (http://www.MIRU-VNTRplus.org) [39–40] for spoligotype patterns of the “major subgroup” of 339 cases, 62.0% (339/547), attributed to predominant M. tuberculosis genotypes (SITs).
A minimum spanning tree was calculated according to Kruskal’s algorithm (Kruskal 1956) and a force-directed graph layout used for visualization. MIRU-VNTRplus clonal complexes (CC) were obtained through single locus variation (SLV), reflecting a single spoligotype spacer difference.
Characteristics of tuberculosis patients (n = 547) by presence of Euro-American lineage or MIRU-VNTRplus spoligotype clonal complex (CC and Singletons) M. tuberculosis strains.
| overall generalized linear model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDRTB | Gender | HIV infection | Age group | |
| Euro-American | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| CC1 | NS | 0.024 * | NS | NS |
| CC2 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| CC3 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| CC4 | NS | 0.031 * | <0.001 *** | NS |
| CC5 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Other CC | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Singletons | NS | NS | 0.030 * | NS |
1 The MIRU-VNTR plus web application (http://www.miru-vntrplus.org) was used to analyse spoligotype data of the M. tuberculosis isolates [39–40]. For minimum spanning tree analysis the the Kruskal’s algorithm and force-directed graph layout for visualization according to the SIT using one single locus variation from the Node, SLV(1) was used to generate groupings into clonal clusters (CC) and Singletons (non-grouped) (Table 1).
2 Statistical models: generalized linear model, Tuberculosis with a Euro-American lineage strain ~ HIV infection + MDRTB + gender + age group, and Tuberculosis with strains from MIRU-VNTR-plus spoligotype derived clonal complexes ~ HIV infection + MDRTB + gender + age group
Note: Significance codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ‘ 1
MDRTB = multidrug resistant tuberculosis
Logistic regression analysis for the “major subgroup” of patients (n = 339) relative to tuberculosis caused by sympatric M. tuberculosis strains.
| Sympatric strains with SITs 20, 64, 389, 244, 1106 (n = 148). | |||||||
| Estimate | Standard Error | Z value | p-value | Odds Ratio | CI Lower Limit | CI Upper Limit | |
| Constant | -14.566 | 882.743 | -0.017 | 0.987 | |||
| MDRTB | 2.155 | 0.558 | 3.857 | <0.001 *** | 8.629 | 3.191 | 30.183 |
| HIV | 0.659 | 0.278 | 2.365 | 0.018 * | 1.933 | 1.121 | 3.355 |
| Sympatric strains with SITs 20, 64, 389, 1106 (n = 118). | |||||||
| Estimate | Standard Error | Z value | p-value | Odds Ratio | CI Lower Limit | CI Upper Limit | |
| Constant | -14.566 | 882.743 | -0.017 | 0.987 | |||
| MDRTB | 2.250 | 0.488 | 4.607 | <0.001 *** | 9.487 | 3.859 | 26.991 |
1 Statistical model: generalized linear model, Tuberculosis with a sympatric strain ~ HIV infection + MDRTB + gender + age group
Note: The interactions between factors were tested but because they were not significant they were not included in the final model. Age and sex were not significant.
Note: Significance codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
MDRTB = multidrug resistant tuberculosis
Fig 2Distribution of the frequency of TB caused by sympatric and allopatric M. tuberculosis strains, as a function of the age group in HIV negative individuals, 68.0% (372/547).
Groups 1 to 8 represent age categories in years of 0 to 4, 5 to 14, 15 to 24, 25 to 34, 35 to 44, 45 to 54, 55 to 64, over 65, respectively. Significant differences across the age groups (Tukey´s HSD, p<0.01) are indicated by lower case letters, identical when the same relationship is obtained; (A) TB by sympatric 26.3% (98/372) versus allopatric 73.7% (274/372) strains, marking the deviation from the usual trimodal age distribution curves; (B) TB by sympatric 23.4% (87/372) versus allopatric 76.6% (285/372) strains when excluding SIT244 strains as sympatric. Significant differences across Age group factor (Tukey´s HSD, p<0.01) are indicated by different letters being the same for each PTSIT (allopatric and sympatric).